Literature DB >> 17450704

Women's responses to information on mammographic breast density.

Joan L Bottorff1, Pamela A Ratner, Joy L Johnson, T Gregory Hislop, Jane A Buxton, Cornelia Zeisser, Weihong Chen, Birgit Reime.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the negative and positive outcomes of providing mammographic breast density (MBD) information to participants of a screening program. A randomized experiment was conducted with a sample of 618 women 50 years or older with MBD greater than 50% of breast volume. The intervention consisted of reporting the presence of MBD in the screening mammography results letter that was sent along with an information pamphlet. Compared to the controls, more women in the intervention group described the term breast density correctly and recognized it as a risk factor for breast cancer. Although at the 4-week follow-up the intervention group indicated that they were "very likely" to have an annual clinical breast examination more frequently than controls, no differences were detected at 6 months. There were no significant differences on other behavioural or psychological measures, although at the 4-week follow-up the control group perceived their risk for breast cancer, relative to other women their age, as "a lot lower" than did women in the intervention group. The results demonstrate a feasible and non-threatening way to provide women with important personalized information about breast cancer risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17450704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Nurs Res        ISSN: 0844-5621


  5 in total

Review 1.  Breast Density Knowledge and Awareness: A Review of Literature.

Authors:  Marimer Santiago-Rivas; Shayna Benjamin; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2016-02-23

Review 2.  Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Joy Melnikow; Joshua J Fenton; Evelyn P Whitlock; Diana L Miglioretti; Meghan S Weyrich; Jamie H Thompson; Kunal Shah
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 3.  Prevention of breast cancer in postmenopausal women: approaches to estimating and reducing risk.

Authors:  Steven R Cummings; Jeffrey A Tice; Scott Bauer; Warren S Browner; Jack Cuzick; Elad Ziv; Victor Vogel; John Shepherd; Celine Vachon; Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  The Impact of Breast Density Information or Notification on Women's Cognitive, Psychological, and Behavioral Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Brooke Nickel; Tessa Copp; Meagan Brennan; Rachel Farber; Kirsten McCaffery; Nehmat Houssami
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Breast Density of Mammography is Correlated with Reproductive Risk Factors Regardless of Menopausal Status: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Korean National Screening Program.

Authors:  Jung Sun Lee; Minkyung Oh
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2020-04-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.