Kathleen A Khong1, Jonathan Hargreaves2, Shadi Aminololama-Shakeri2, Karen K Lindfors2. 1. Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis, School of Medicine, Sacramento, California. Electronic address: kathleen.khong@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu. 2. Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis, School of Medicine, Sacramento, California.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate primary physician awareness of the California Breast Density Notification Law and its impact on primary care practice. METHODS: An online survey was distributed to 174 physicians within a single primary care network system 10 months after California's breast density notification law took effect. The survey assessed physicians' awareness of the law, perceived changes in patient levels of concern about breast density, and physician comfort levels in handling breast density management issues. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 77 physicians (45%). Roughly half of those surveyed (49%) reported no knowledge of the breast density notification legislation. Only 32% of respondents noted an increase in patient levels of concern about breast density compared to prior years. The majority were only "somewhat comfortable" (55%) or "not comfortable" (12%) with breast density questions, and almost one-third (32%) had referred patients to a breast health clinic for these discussions. A total of 75% of those surveyed would be interested in more specific education on the subject. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness among primary care clinicians of the California Breast Density Notification Law is low, and many do not feel comfortable answering breast density-related patient questions. Breast imagers and institutions may need to devote additional time and resources to primary physician education in order for density notification laws to have significant impact on patient care.
PURPOSE: To investigate primary physician awareness of the California Breast Density Notification Law and its impact on primary care practice. METHODS: An online survey was distributed to 174 physicians within a single primary care network system 10 months after California's breast density notification law took effect. The survey assessed physicians' awareness of the law, perceived changes in patient levels of concern about breast density, and physician comfort levels in handling breast density management issues. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 77 physicians (45%). Roughly half of those surveyed (49%) reported no knowledge of the breast density notification legislation. Only 32% of respondents noted an increase in patient levels of concern about breast density compared to prior years. The majority were only "somewhat comfortable" (55%) or "not comfortable" (12%) with breast density questions, and almost one-third (32%) had referred patients to a breast health clinic for these discussions. A total of 75% of those surveyed would be interested in more specific education on the subject. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness among primary care clinicians of the California Breast Density Notification Law is low, and many do not feel comfortable answering breast density-related patient questions. Breast imagers and institutions may need to devote additional time and resources to primary physician education in order for density notification laws to have significant impact on patient care.
Authors: Elissa R Price; Jonathan Hargreaves; Jafi A Lipson; Edward A Sickles; R James Brenner; Karen K Lindfors; Bonnie N Joe; Jessica W T Leung; Stephen A Feig; Lawrence W Bassett; Haydee Ojeda-Fournier; Bruce L Daniel; Allison W Kurian; Elyse Love; Lauren Ryan; Donna D Walgenbach; Debra M Ikeda Journal: Radiology Date: 2013-10-28 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Wendie A Berg; Zheng Zhang; Daniel Lehrer; Roberta A Jong; Etta D Pisano; Richard G Barr; Marcela Böhm-Vélez; Mary C Mahoney; W Phil Evans; Linda H Larsen; Marilyn J Morton; Ellen B Mendelson; Dione M Farria; Jean B Cormack; Helga S Marques; Amanda Adams; Nolin M Yeh; Glenna Gabrielli Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-04-04 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Martha B Mainiero; Ana Lourenco; Mary C Mahoney; Mary S Newell; Lisa Bailey; Lora D Barke; Carl D'Orsi; Jennifer A Harvey; Mary K Hayes; Phan Tuong Huynh; Peter M Jokich; Su-Ju Lee; Constance D Lehman; David A Mankoff; Joshua A Nepute; Samir B Patel; Handel E Reynolds; M Linda Sutherland; Bruce G Haffty Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: J Whitehead; T Carlile; K J Kopecky; D J Thompson; F I Gilbert; A J Present; B A Threatt; P Krook; E Hadaway Journal: Cancer Date: 1985-09-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Susan H Busch; Jessica R Hoag; Jenerius A Aminawung; Xiao Xu; Ilana B Richman; Pamela R Soulos; Kelly A Kyanko; Cary P Gross Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2019-03-21 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Christine M Gunn; Nancy R Kressin; Kristina Cooper; Cinthya Marturano; Karen M Freund; Tracy A Battaglia Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2018-01-17 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Karen E Schifferdecker; Anna N A Tosteson; Celia Kaplan; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana S M Buist; Louise M Henderson; Dianne Johnson; Jill Jaworski; Gloria Jackson-Nefertiti; Kelly Ehrlich; Mary W Marsh; Lisa Vu; Tracy Onega; Karen J Wernli Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-12-02 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Stephanie Lynn Chau; Amy Alabaster; Karin Luikart; Leslie Manace Brenman; Laurel A Habel Journal: J Prim Care Community Health Date: 2016-10-31
Authors: Jenerius A Aminawung; Jessica R Hoag; Kelly A Kyanko; Xiao Xu; Ilana B Richman; Susan H Busch; Cary P Gross Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2020-06-14 Impact factor: 4.452