Literature DB >> 31977078

Prior breast density awareness, knowledge, and communication in a health system-embedded behavioral intervention trial.

Siobhan S Mahorter1, Sarah Knerr1, Erin J Aiello Bowles2, Karen J Wernli2, Hongyuan Gao2, Marc D Schwartz3, Suzanne C O'Neill3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast density is an important breast cancer risk factor and a focus of recent national and state health policy efforts. This article describes breast density awareness, knowledge, and communication among participants in a health system-embedded trial with clinically elevated breast cancer risk 1 year before state-mandated density disclosure.
METHODS: Trial participants' demographics and prior health history were ascertained from electronic health records. The proportions of women reporting prior breast density awareness, knowledge of density's masking effect, and communication with a provider about their own breast density were calculated using baseline interview data collected from 2017 to 2018. Multiple logistic regression was used to estimate associations between women's characteristics and density awareness, knowledge, and communication.
RESULTS: Although the overwhelming majority of participants had heard of breast density (91%) and were aware of breast density's masking effect (87%), only 60% had ever discussed their breast density with a provider. Annual mammography screening was associated with prior breast density awareness (odds ratio [OR], 2.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-6.81), knowledge (OR, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.20-6.66), and communication (OR, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.34-6.16) compared with an infrequent or unknown screening interval. Receipt of breast biopsy was also associated with prior knowledge (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.04-2.45) and communication (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.00-1.85).
CONCLUSIONS: Breast density awareness and knowledge are high among insured women participating in clinical research, even in the absence of mandated density disclosure. Patient-provider communication about personal density status is less common, particularly among women with fewer interactions with breast health specialists.
© 2020 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  awareness; breast density; communication; knowledge

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31977078      PMCID: PMC7103492          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  29 in total

Review 1.  Breast Density Knowledge and Awareness: A Review of Literature.

Authors:  Marimer Santiago-Rivas; Shayna Benjamin; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2016-02-23

2.  Awareness of breast density and its impact on breast cancer detection and risk.

Authors:  Deborah J Rhodes; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Jeanette Y Ziegenfuss; Sarah M Jenkins; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  "You probably can't feel as safe as normal women": Hispanic women's reactions to breast density notification.

Authors:  Alsacia L Pacsi-Sepulveda; Rachel C Shelton; Carmen B Rodriguez; Arielle T Coq; Parisa Tehranifar
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Genetic analysis of mammographic breast density in adult women: evidence of a gene effect.

Authors:  J S Pankow; C M Vachon; C C Kuni; R A King; D K Arnett; D M Grabrick; S S Rich; V E Anderson; T A Sellers
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-04-16       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Tolerance for uncertainty and perceived risk among women receiving uninformative BRCA1/2 test results.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Tiffani DeMarco; Beth N Peshkin; Sarah Rogers; Jessica Rispoli; Karen Brown; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 3.908

6.  A web-based personalized risk communication and decision-making tool for women with dense breasts: Design and methods of a randomized controlled trial within an integrated health care system.

Authors:  Sarah Knerr; Karen J Wernli; Kathleen Leppig; Kelly Ehrlich; Amanda L Graham; David Farrell; Chalanda Evans; George Luta; Marc D Schwartz; Suzanne C O'Neill
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 2.226

7.  Impact of Breast Density Legislation on Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Supplemental Screening: A Survey of 110 Radiology Facilities.

Authors:  Lina Nayak; Kanae K Miyake; Jessica W T Leung; Elissa R Price; Yueyi I Liu; Bonnie N Joe; Edward A Sickles; William R Thomas; Jafi A Lipson; Bruce L Daniel; Jonathan Hargreaves; R James Brenner; Lawrence W Bassett; Haydee Ojeda-Fournier; Karen K Lindfors; Stephen A Feig; Debra M Ikeda
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 2.431

8.  Explaining between-race differences in African-American and European-American women's responses to breast density notification.

Authors:  Mark Manning; Terrance L Albrecht; Zeynep Yilmaz-Saab; Louis Penner; Andria Norman; Kristen Purrington
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  The Effect of California's Breast Density Notification Legislation on Breast Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Stephanie Lynn Chau; Amy Alabaster; Karin Luikart; Leslie Manace Brenman; Laurel A Habel
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2016-10-31

Review 10.  Mammographic density, breast cancer risk and risk prediction.

Authors:  Celine M Vachon; Carla H van Gils; Thomas A Sellers; Karthik Ghosh; Sandhya Pruthi; Kathleen R Brandt; V Shane Pankratz
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  5 in total

1.  The Impact of Breast Density Information or Notification on Women's Cognitive, Psychological, and Behavioral Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Brooke Nickel; Tessa Copp; Meagan Brennan; Rachel Farber; Kirsten McCaffery; Nehmat Houssami
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Characteristics Associated with Participation in ENGAGED 2 - A Web-based Breast Cancer Risk Communication and Decision Support Trial.

Authors:  Karen J Wernli; Erin A Bowles; Sarah Knerr; Kathleen A Leppig; Kelly Ehrlich; Hongyuan Gao; Marc D Schwartz; Suzanne C O'Neill
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2020-12

3.  Effect of a Randomized Trial of a Web-Based Intervention on Patient-Provider Communication About Breast Density.

Authors:  Erin J Aiello Bowles; Suzanne C O'Neill; Tengfei Li; Sarah Knerr; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Marc D Schwartz; Jinani Jayasekera; Kathleen Leppig; Kelly Ehrlich; David Farrell; Hongyuan Gao; Amanda L Graham; George Luta; Karen J Wernli
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Effect of Personalized Breast Cancer Risk Tool on Chemoprevention and Breast Imaging: ENGAGED-2 Trial.

Authors:  Karen J Wernli; Sarah Knerr; Tengfei Li; Kathleen Leppig; Kelly Ehrlich; David Farrell; Hongyuan Gao; Erin J A Bowles; Amanda L Graham; George Luta; Jinani Jayasekera; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Marc D Schwartz; Suzanne C O'Neill
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2021-01-14

5.  Breast Density Awareness and Knowledge in a Mammography Screening Cohort of Predominantly Hispanic Women: Does Breast Density Notification Matter?

Authors:  Jessica D Austin; Mariangela Agovino; Carmen B Rodriguez; Mary Beth Terry; Rachel C Shelton; Ying Wei; Elise Desperito; Karen M Schmitt; Rita Kukafka; Parisa Tehranifar
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 4.254

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.