Literature DB >> 21693599

Spatial resolution and perception of patterns mediated by a subretinal 16-electrode array in patients blinded by hereditary retinal dystrophies.

Robert Wilke1, Veit-Peter Gabel, Helmut Sachs, Karl-Ulrich Bartz Schmidt, Florian Gekeler, Dorothea Besch, Peter Szurman, Alfred Stett, Barbara Wilhelm, Tobias Peters, Alex Harscher, Udo Greppmaier, Steffen Kibbel, Heval Benav, Anna Bruckmann, Katarina Stingl, Akos Kusnyerik, Eberhart Zrenner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The perception of 11 persons blinded by hereditary retinal degeneration elicited by a subretinally implanted 16-electrode array used for light-independent direct stimulation of the retina is described. This device is part of the Tübingen retina implant, which also employs a light-sensitive, multiphotodiode array (MPDA). The ability to reliably recognize complex spatial percepts was investigated.
METHODS: Eleven blind volunteers received implants and participated in standardized psychophysical tests investigating the size and shape of perceptions elicited by single-electrode activation, multiple-electrode activation, and activation of compound patterns such as simplified letters.
RESULTS: Visual percepts were elicited reliably in 8 of 11 patients. On single-electrode activation, percepts were generally described as round spots of light of distinguishable localization in the visual field. On activation of a pattern of electrodes, percepts matched that pattern when electrodes were activated sequentially. Patterns such as horizontal or vertical bars were identified reliably; the most recent participant was able to recognize simplified letters presented on the 16-electrode array. The smallest distance between sites of concurrent retinal stimulation still yielding discernible spots of light was assessed to be 280 μm, corresponding to a logMAR of 1.78.
CONCLUSIONS: Subretinal electric stimulation can yield reliable, predictable percepts. Patterned perception is feasible, enabling blind persons to recognize shapes and discriminate different letters. Stimulation paradigms must be optimized, to further increase spatial resolution, demanding a better understanding of physical and biological effects of single versus repetitive stimulation (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00515814).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21693599     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-6946

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  43 in total

1.  Neuroscience: how brains learn to control machines.

Authors:  David T Blake
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Pulse trains to percepts: the challenge of creating a perceptually intelligible world with sight recovery technologies.

Authors:  Ione Fine; Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Properties of electrically evoked potentials activated by optic nerve stimulation with penetrating electrodes of different modes in rabbits.

Authors:  Pengjia Cao; Jingjing Sun; Yan Yan; Yao Chen; Xinyu Chai; Xiaodong Sun; Qiushi Ren; Liming Li
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Proceedings of the First International Optogenetic Therapies for Vision Symposium.

Authors:  Peter J Francis; Brian Mansfield; Stephen Rose
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.283

5.  Temporal properties of network-mediated responses to repetitive stimuli are dependent upon retinal ganglion cell type.

Authors:  Maesoon Im; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Performance of photovoltaic arrays in-vivo and characteristics of prosthetic vision in animals with retinal degeneration.

Authors:  Henri Lorach; Georges Goetz; Yossi Mandel; Xin Lei; Ludwig Galambos; Theodore I Kamins; Keith Mathieson; Philip Huie; Roopa Dalal; James S Harris; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Spatially patterned electrical stimulation to enhance resolution of retinal prostheses.

Authors:  Lauren H Jepson; Paweł Hottowy; Keith Mathieson; Deborah E Gunning; Władysław Dąbrowski; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Macular function in macular degenerations: repeatability of microperimetry as a potential outcome measure for ABCA4-associated retinopathy trials.

Authors:  Artur V Cideciyan; Malgorzata Swider; Tomas S Aleman; Willam J Feuer; Sharon B Schwartz; Robert C Russell; Janet D Steinberg; Edwin M Stone; Samuel G Jacobson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Undersized dendritic arborizations in retinal ganglion cells of the rd1 mutant mouse: a paradigm of early onset photoreceptor degeneration.

Authors:  Devid Damiani; Elena Novelli; Francesca Mazzoni; Enrica Strettoi
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.215

10.  Harmonization of Outcomes and Vision Endpoints in Vision Restoration Trials: Recommendations from the International HOVER Taskforce.

Authors:  Lauren N Ayton; Joseph F Rizzo; Ian L Bailey; August Colenbrander; Gislin Dagnelie; Duane R Geruschat; Philip C Hessburg; Chris D McCarthy; Matthew A Petoe; Gary S Rubin; Philip R Troyk
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 3.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.