| Literature DB >> 26903975 |
Gerardo Puopolo1, Selena Tomada2, Paolo Sonego3, Marco Moretto3, Kristof Engelen3, Michele Perazzolli1, Ilaria Pertot1.
Abstract
Lysobacter capsici AZ78 has considerable potential for biocontrol of phytopathogenic microorganisms. However, lack of information about genetic cues regarding its biological characteristics may slow down its exploitation as a biofungicide. In order to obtain a comprehensive overview of genetic features, the L. capsici AZ78 genome was sequenced, annotated and compared with the phylogenetically related pathogens Stenotrophomonas malthophilia K729a and Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris ATCC 33913. Whole genome comparison, supported by functional analysis, indicated that L. capsici AZ78 has a larger number of genes responsible for interaction with phytopathogens and environmental stress than S. malthophilia K729a and X. c. pv. campestris ATCC 33913. Genes involved in the production of antibiotics, lytic enzymes and siderophores were specific for L. capsici AZ78, as well as genes involved in resistance to antibiotics, environmental stressors, fungicides and heavy metals. The L. capsici AZ78 genome did not encompass genes involved in infection of humans and plants included in the S. malthophilia K729a and X. c. pv. campestris ATCC 33913 genomes, respectively. The L. capsici AZ78 genome provides a genetic framework for detailed analysis of other L. capsici members and the development of novel biofungicides based on this bacterial strain.Entities:
Keywords: Lysobacter; biological control; environmental stress; lytic enzymes; siderophores
Year: 2016 PMID: 26903975 PMCID: PMC4742617 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00096
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1Graphic representation of the . Circles show (from the inside): (1) Lc AZ78 genome; (2) GC percent; (3) GC skew (4,5); Blast comparison of the Lc AZ78 genome with Sm K729a and Xcc ATCC 33913.
Summary of the genomic characteristics of .
| Contigs | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| Number of bases (bp) | 6,272,844 | 4,851,126 | 5,076,187 |
| G+C content (%) | 66.43 | 66.70 | 65.00 |
| Number of predicted coding sequences | 5292 | 4386 | 4182 |
| Coding percentage | 82.8 | 88.8 | 84.34 |
| rRNA | 7 | 4 | 2 |
| tRNA | 85 | 74 | 53 |
Figure 2Comparison between the genomes of . The Venn Diagram shows the number of shared and genome-specific genes in Lc AZ78, Sm K729a and Xcc ATCC 33913.
List of genes specific to .
| Interaction with microorganisms | Production of extracellular protease | Proteolytic Region (AZ78_4508, 4509, 4511, 4512) | Production of zinc extracellular proteases | |
| Degradation of glucans | Proteolytic Region (AZ78_4514, 4516) | Production of bacterial leucyl aminopeptidase | ||
| Degradation of chitin | Metalloendopeptidase Region (AZ78_269, 271, 272) | Production of metalloendopeptidases | ||
| Uptake of ferrous iron | Degradation of cellulose | |||
| Degradation of glucans | ||||
| Degradation of chitin | ||||
| NPR-PKS (AZ78_1098) | Production of antifungal compounds | |||
| Production of lantibiotics | ||||
| Synthesis of cathecol siderophores | ||||
| Interaction with environment | Biosynthesis of xanthomonadin | Catalase/Peroxidase (AZ78_681, 1116, 1469) | Resistance to reactive oxygen species | |
| Resistance to copper ions | Cyanophycin metabolism | |||
| Resistance to heavy metals | Copper efflux region (AZ78_560-562) | Resistance to copper ions | ||
| Resistance-Nodulation-Division (AZ78_451, 452, 826) | Resistance to toxic compounds | SMR protein (AZ78_906, 1192, 2446) | Resistance to toxic compounds | |
| ABC transporters (AZ78_929, 967, 3014) | Resistance to β-lactams | MFS protein (AZ78_266, 1103, 3068, 3698, 3949, 4767) | Resistance to toxic compounds | |
| Resistance to β-lactams | Kanamycin nucleotidyltransferase (AZ78_3393) | Resistance to aminoglycosides | ||
| B-lactamases (AZ78_238, 2665, 3448, 3627, 4028) | Resistance to β-lactams | |||
Figure 3Proteolytic activity in the . Proteolytic activity was monitored 6, 24, and 48 h after the following treatments: Lc AZ78 (●), P. infestans (■) and Lc AZ78 + P. infestans (▲). Mean and standard error values for six replicates (2 ml-tubes) pooled from two experiments are reported for each condition. Different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukey's test (α = 0.05).
Figure 4Characterization of . Lc AZ78 produces (A) cellulases; (B) β-glucanases; (C) chitinases, and (D) siderophores.
Antifungal activity of .
| 4.50 ± 0.05 | 1.50 ± 0.16 | |
| 6.10 ± 0.12 | 1.36 ± 0.06 | |
| 2.32 ± 0.07 | 0.65 ± 0.03 | |
| 2.50 ± 0.02 | 0.58 ± 0.02 | |
| 2.68 ± 0.09 | 0.48 ± 0.04 | |
| 7.45 ± 0.10 | 2.54 ± 0.12 | |
| 7.86 ± 0.21 | 1.84 ± 0.14 | |
| 7.92 ± 0.12 | 3.72 ± 0.16 | |
| 3.56 ± 0.13 | 1.77 ± 0.24 | |
| 7.56 ± 0.34 | 4.34 ± 0.18 | |
| 7.34 ± 0.25 | 3.10 ± 0.15 | |
| 7.12 ± 0.21 | 3.08 ± 0.04 | |
| 7.11 ± 0.12 | 2.24 ± 0.08 | |
| 7.83 ± 0.08 | 4.42 ± 0.12 | |
| 7.95 ± 0.09 | 2.66 ± 0.11 | |
| 3.52 ± 0.20 | 1.76 ± 0.06 | |
| 3.92 ± 0.21 | 2.23 ± 0.06 | |
| 7.84 ± 0.08 | 7.73 ± 0.13 | |
| 7.89 ± 0.11 | 1.73 ± 0.16 | |
| 7.86 ± 0.14 | 1.84 ± 0.08 | |
| 7.92 ± 0.15 | 1.86 ± 0.20 | |
| 7.94 ± 0.13 | 1.46 ± 0.27 | |
| 7.89 ± 0.17 | 3.50 ± 0.16 |
The antifungal activity of Lc AZ78 was assessed through dual-culture assay. Mean and standard errors values of mycelial growth diameters (cm) with six replicates (Petri dishes) pooled from two experiments are reported for each fungus.
Values followed by asterisks differ significantly according to Student's t-test (α = 005).
Antibacterial activity of .
| 0 ± 0 | |
| 0 ± 0 | |
| 0 ± 0 | |
| 0 ± 0 | |
| 12.44 ± 0.55 | |
| 12.77 ± 0.16 | |
| 10.38 ± 1.06 | |
| 11.05 ± 0.65 |
The production of secondary metabolites with antibacterial activity by Lc AZ78 was assessed against Gram-negative and Gram-positive phytopathogenic bacteria. Antibacterial activity is expressed as the mean value of the halo inhibition zone ± standard errors. Six replicates (Petri dishes) pooled from two experiments are reported for each bacterium. No significant differences were present in inhibition zones according to Tukey's test (α = 005).
Figure 5Assessment of . Lc AZ78 (white columns) was evaluated to assess its ability to resist zinc (A) and cobalt (B) at two concentrations (0.5 and 1 mM). B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42 (gray columns) was used as control. Mean and standard error values (columns) for six replicates (Petri dishes) pooled from two experiments are reported for each heavy metal concentration. Different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukey's test (α = 0.05).
Figure 6Resistance of . The survival of Lc AZ78 cells in the presence of fungicides and insecticides was assessed by growing the bacterium on LBA amended with plant protection products at concentrations commonly applied in the field. The reduction in cell viability was calculated as the ratio between the CFU difference for Lc AZ78 grown on LBA and Lc AZ78 grown on LBA amended with plant protection products, over Lc AZ78 CFU grown on LBA. Mean and standard error values (columns) for six replicates (Petri dishes) pooled from two experiments are reported for each plant protection product.
Assessment of .
| Ampicillin | 10 | 0.00±0.00 | <14 |
| Chloramphenicol | 30 | 52.10±1.01 | <19 |
| Erythromycin | 30 | 45.83±0.81 | |
| Gentamicin | 30 | 23.33±0.21 | <17 |
| Kanamycin | 30 | 0.00±0.00 | |
| Streptomycin | 25 | 0.00±0.00 | <12 |
| Tetracycline | 30 | 43.90±0.55 | <17 |
| Tobramycin | 10 | 0.00±0.00 | <16 |
| Trimethoprim | 5 | 23.23±0.67 | <13 |
| Vancomycin | 30 | 23.70±0.21 |
Lc AZ78 was evaluated for its resistance to different antibiotics. The results are the mean diameters ± standard errors of pooled data for a repeated experiment with three replicates of each antibiotic for each experiment. The diameters of inhibition zone were determined to assign resistance or sensitivity to each antibiotic.
Cut-off diameters to define resistance to the tested antibiotic (Andrews et al., .