| Literature DB >> 33182371 |
Anthi Vlassi1, Andrea Nesler2, Alexandra Parich1, Gerardo Puopolo3,4, Rainer Schuhmacher1.
Abstract
Plant beneficial rhizobacteria may antagonize soilborne plant pathogens by producing a vast array of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The production of these compounds depends on the medium composition used for bacterial cell growth. Accordingly, Lysobacter capsici AZ78 (AZ78) grown on a protein-rich medium was previously found to emit volatile pyrazines with toxic activity against soilborne phypathogenic fungi and oomycetes. However, the discrepancy between the quantity of pyrazines in the gaseous phase and the minimum quantity needed to achieve inhibition of plant pathogens observed, lead us to further investigate the volatile-mediated inhibitory activity of AZ78. Here, we show that, besides VOCs, AZ78 cells produce ammonia in increased amounts when a protein-rich medium is used for bacterial growth. The production of this volatile compound caused the alkalinization of the physically separated culture medium where Rhizoctonia solani was inoculated subsequently. Results achieved in this work clearly demonstrate that VOC, ammonia and the growth medium alkalinization contribute to the overall inhibitory activity of AZ78 against R. solani. Thus, our findings suggest that the volatile-mediated inhibitory activity of rhizobacteria in protein-rich substrates can be regarded as a result of multiple factors interaction, rather than exclusively VOCs production.Entities:
Keywords: Lysobacter capsici AZ78; Rhizoctonia solani; VOC; ammonia; protein-rich medium; rhizobacteria; substrate pH
Year: 2020 PMID: 33182371 PMCID: PMC7695267 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8111761
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Conditions chosen for testing the involvement of multiple factors interaction for Rhizoctonia solani growth inhibition.
| Factor | Condition | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
| NH3 a | + | + | - | - | + | + | - | - |
| VOC b | + | - | + | - | + | - | + | - |
| pH | 5.6 c | 5.6 | 5.6 | 5.6 | 8.2 d | 8.2 | 8.2 | 8.2 |
a aq. solution of NH3 was used at 50 μmol; b 5 mg of 2-ethyl-3-methoxypyrazine per Petri dish were used as a representative volatile organic compound (VOC); c PDA pH as set by manufacturer; d PDA pH was raised to 8.2 by NaOH solution.
Figure 1Inhibition of Rhizoctonia solani growth by Lysobacter capsici AZ78 volatiles emitted on different growth media. The side where R. solani had been grown is illustrated: (A) Control, not inoculated with AZ78; (B) AZ78 on Nutrient Agar and (C) AZ78 on Nutrient Agar amended with d-Glucose (20 g/L).
Involvement of gaseous ammonia produced by Lysobacter capsici AZ78 in Rhizoctonia solani growth inhibition.
| Treatment | Mycelial Growth Inhibition (%) |
|---|---|
| AZ78 on NA medium | (99.0 ± 0.8) |
| AZ78 on NAG medium | (20.4 ± 3.2) b |
| 50 μmol NH3 | (33.0 ± 2.7) a |
| 5 μmol NH3 | (3.0 ± 0.6) c |
Inhibition of R. solani growth was monitored at 72 hpi; data presented as mean ± standard error of ten replicates pooled from two independent experiments; different letters indicate significant differences among treatments according to the Tukey’s HSD test (p ≤ 0.05).
Involvement of elevated PDA pH in Rhizoctonia solani growth inhibition by Lysobacter capsici AZ78.
| Treatment | Mycelial Growth Inhibition (%) |
|---|---|
| AZ78 on NA medium | (99.0 ± 0.8) * |
| PDA pH 8.2 by NaOH | (55.4 ± 1.4) |
| PDA pH 8.2 by NH3 | 100 * |
| AZ78 on NAG medium | (20.4 ± 3.2) b |
| PDA pH 7.6 by NaOH | (21.3 ± 1.4) b |
| PDA pH 7.6 by NH3 | (35.8 ± 2.3) a |
Inhibition of R. solani growth was monitored at 72 hpi. Data presented as mean ± standard error of ten replicates pooled from two independent experiments; different letters indicate significant differences according to the Tukey’s HSD test (p ≤ 0.05). * As no growth of R. solani mycelium was observed in most of split Petri dishes after AZ78 had been grown on NA as well as in all Petri dishes in which the pH value of PDA had been adjusted to 8.2 by NH3, these two treatments were excluded from the statistical analysis.
Figure 2Inhibitory effect caused by multiple factors. Data presented as mean ± standard error of five replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences among treatments according to the Games-Howell test (p ≤ 0.05) in the case of PDA with pH 5.6 and to the Tukey’s HSD test (p ≤ 0.05) in the case of PDA with pH 8.2.