| Literature DB >> 36141538 |
Na Li1,2, Hongna Li3, Changxiong Zhu3, Chong Liu3, Guofeng Su1,2, Jianguo Chen1,2.
Abstract
Heavy metals have the potential to influence the transmission of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). However, the effect on AMR caused by heavy metals has not been clearly revealed. In this study, we used a microcosm experiment and metagenomics to examine whether common levels of Cu and Zn in pig manure influence AMR transmission in manured soil. We found that the abundance of 204 ARGs significantly increased after manure application, even though the manure did not contain antibiotic residuals. However, the combined addition of low Cu and Zn (500 and 1000 mg/kg, respectively) only caused 14 ARGs to significantly increase, and high Cu and Zn (1000 and 3000 mg/kg, respectively) caused 27 ARGs to significantly increase. The disparity of these numbers suggested that factors within the manure were the primary driving reasons for AMR transmission, rather than metal amendments. A similar trend was found for biocide and metal resistance genes (BMRGs) and mobile genetic elements (MGEs). This study offers deeper insights into AMR transmission in relation to the effects of manure application and heavy metals at commonly reported levels. Our findings recommend that more comprehensive measures in controlling AMR in the pig industry are needed apart from restricting heavy metal additions.Entities:
Keywords: heavy metal; metagenomic sequencing; pig manure; soil
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36141538 PMCID: PMC9517514 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191811265
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Background heavy metal content in original soil and pig manure (mg/kg dry weight).
| Metal | Cu | Zn | Cd | As | Pb | Ni |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soil * | 22.16 ± 0.29 | 49.60 ± 0.44 | 0.16 ± 0.02 | ND | ND | ND |
| Pig manure | 27.48 ± 1.29 | 93.14 ± 6.04 | 0.92 ± 0.04 | 0.87 ± 0.07 | 7.07 ± 0.35 | 7.44 ± 0.54 |
* Mean ± SD. ND, not determined.
Figure 1Heavy metal content in the experimental soils used in this study. (A) Total and (B) available Cu and Zn. Lowercase letters indicate statistical significance for treatment comparisons (ANOVA, p < 0.05).
Bacterial community richness and diversity indices in soil treatments.
| Index | ACE | ACE Significance | Shannon | Shannon Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 202.33 ± 6.03 1 | C 2 | 5.54 ± 0.13 | C 2 |
| NCuZn | 620.67 ± 7.02 | b | 6.04 ± 0.064 | B |
| LCuZn | 656.67 ± 44.46 | b | 6.21 ± 0.064 | B |
| HCuZn | 757.67 ± 35.53 | a | 6.47 ± 0.036 | A |
1 Mean ± SD. 2 Lower and upper letters indicate significance between groups (ANOVA, p < 0.05).
Figure 2Bacterial community composition in different treatments. (A) Phylum level, (B) genus level.
Figure 3Number of differential genes between the experimental groups used in this study. (A) Total numbers of differential ARGs and BMRGs, (B) numbers of differential ARGs and BMRGs that increased in abundance due to manure application or heavy metal amendment, (C) total numbers of differential MGEs, and (D) numbers of differential MGEs that increased in abundance due to manure application or heavy metal amendment.
Figure 4Differential ARG profiles between the experimental groups used in this study. (A) Frequency of total differential ARGs between treatments (%), (B) frequency of differential ARGs (%) that increased in abundance because of manure application or heavy metal amendment. AMR, antimicrobial resistance.