Lamya A Atweh1, Nicholas A Dodd1, Ramkumar Krishnamurthy1, Amol Pednekar2, Zili D Chu1, Rajesh Krishnamurthy3,4,5. 1. EB Singleton Department of Pediatric Radiology, Cardiovascular Imaging, Texas Children's Hospital, 6701 Fannin St., Suite 1280, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. 2. Philips Healthcare, Houston, TX, USA. 3. EB Singleton Department of Pediatric Radiology, Cardiovascular Imaging, Texas Children's Hospital, 6701 Fannin St., Suite 1280, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. rxkrishn@texaschildrens.org. 4. Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. rxkrishn@texaschildrens.org. 5. Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. rxkrishn@texaschildrens.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Breath-held two-dimensional balanced steady--state free precession cine acquisition (2-D breath-held SSFP), accelerated with parallel imaging, is the method of choice for evaluating ventricular function due to its superior blood-to-myocardial contrast, edge definition and high intrinsic signal-to-noise ratio throughout the cardiac cycle. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to qualitatively and quantitatively compare the two different single-breath-hold 3-D cine SSFP acquisitions using 1) multidirectional sensitivity encoding (SENSE) acceleration factors (3-D multiple SENSE SSFP), and 2) k-t broad-use linear acceleration speed-up technique (3-D k-t SSFP) with the conventional 2-D breath-held SSFP in non-sedated asymptomatic volunteers and children with single ventricle congenital heart disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our prospective study was performed on 30 non-sedated subjects (9 healthy volunteers and 21 functional single ventricle patients), ages 12.5 +/- 2.8 years. Two-dimensional breath-held SSFP with SENSE acceleration factor of 2, eight-fold accelerated 3-D k-t SSFP, and 3-D multiple SENSE SSFP with total parallel imaging factor of 4 were performed to evaluate ventricular volumes and mass in the short-axis orientation. Image quality scores (blood myocardial contrast, edge definition and interslice alignment) and volumetric analysis (end systolic volume, end diastolic volume and ejection fraction) were performed on the data sets by experienced users. Paired t-test was performed to compare each of the 3-D k-t SSFP and 3-D multiple SENSE SSFP clinical scores against 2-D breath-held SSFP. Bland-Altman analysis was performed on left ventricle (LV) and single ventricle volumetry. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in volumetric measurements were determined using intraclass coefficients. RESULTS: The clinical scores were highest for the 2-D breath-held SSFP images. Between the two 3-D sequences, 3-D multiple SENSE SSFP performed better than 3-D k-t SSFP. Bland-Altman analysis for volumes indicated that variability was more between 3-D k-t SSFP and 2-D breath-held SSFP acquisitions than between 3-D multiple SENSE SSFP and 2-D breath-held SSFP acquisitions. In the non-sedated population, interslice alignment scores were better for 3-D k-t SSFP and 3-D multiple SENSE SSFP than 2-D breath-held SSFP. The blood-myocardial contrast and edge definition scores were better for 2-D breath-held SSFP than 3-D k-t SSFP and 3-D multiple SENSE SSFP. Scan duration was shorter for 3-D acquisition sequences compared to the 2-D breath-held stack. CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional k-t SSFP and 3-D multiple SENSE for ventricular volumetry release the constraints of multiple breath-holds in children and overcome problems related to interslice misalignment caused by inconsistent amplitude of breathing. Three-dimensional multiple SENSE SSFP performed better in our pediatric population than 3-D k-t SSFP. However, these 3-D sequences produce lower-quality diagnostic images than the gold standard 2-D breath-held SSFP sequence.
BACKGROUND: Breath-held two-dimensional balanced steady--state free precession cine acquisition (2-D breath-held SSFP), accelerated with parallel imaging, is the method of choice for evaluating ventricular function due to its superior blood-to-myocardial contrast, edge definition and high intrinsic signal-to-noise ratio throughout the cardiac cycle. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to qualitatively and quantitatively compare the two different single-breath-hold 3-D cine SSFP acquisitions using 1) multidirectional sensitivity encoding (SENSE) acceleration factors (3-D multiple SENSE SSFP), and 2) k-t broad-use linear acceleration speed-up technique (3-D k-t SSFP) with the conventional 2-D breath-held SSFP in non-sedated asymptomatic volunteers and children with single ventricle congenital heart disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our prospective study was performed on 30 non-sedated subjects (9 healthy volunteers and 21 functional single ventricle patients), ages 12.5 +/- 2.8 years. Two-dimensional breath-held SSFP with SENSE acceleration factor of 2, eight-fold accelerated 3-D k-t SSFP, and 3-D multiple SENSE SSFP with total parallel imaging factor of 4 were performed to evaluate ventricular volumes and mass in the short-axis orientation. Image quality scores (blood myocardial contrast, edge definition and interslice alignment) and volumetric analysis (end systolic volume, end diastolic volume and ejection fraction) were performed on the data sets by experienced users. Paired t-test was performed to compare each of the 3-D k-t SSFP and 3-D multiple SENSE SSFP clinical scores against 2-D breath-held SSFP. Bland-Altman analysis was performed on left ventricle (LV) and single ventricle volumetry. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in volumetric measurements were determined using intraclass coefficients. RESULTS: The clinical scores were highest for the 2-D breath-held SSFP images. Between the two 3-D sequences, 3-D multiple SENSE SSFP performed better than 3-D k-t SSFP. Bland-Altman analysis for volumes indicated that variability was more between 3-D k-t SSFP and 2-D breath-held SSFP acquisitions than between 3-D multiple SENSE SSFP and 2-D breath-held SSFP acquisitions. In the non-sedated population, interslice alignment scores were better for 3-D k-t SSFP and 3-D multiple SENSE SSFP than 2-D breath-held SSFP. The blood-myocardial contrast and edge definition scores were better for 2-D breath-held SSFP than 3-D k-t SSFP and 3-D multiple SENSE SSFP. Scan duration was shorter for 3-D acquisition sequences compared to the 2-D breath-held stack. CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional k-t SSFP and 3-D multiple SENSE for ventricular volumetry release the constraints of multiple breath-holds in children and overcome problems related to interslice misalignment caused by inconsistent amplitude of breathing. Three-dimensional multiple SENSE SSFP performed better in our pediatric population than 3-D k-t SSFP. However, these 3-D sequences produce lower-quality diagnostic images than the gold standard 2-D breath-held SSFP sequence.
Authors: Bernd J Wintersperger; Scott B Reeder; Konstantin Nikolaou; Olaf Dietrich; Armin Huber; Andreas Greiser; Titus Lanz; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Scott B Reeder; Bernd J Wintersperger; Olaf Dietrich; Titus Lanz; Andreas Greiser; Maximilian F Reiser; Gary M Glazer; Stefan O Schoenberg Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Neil B Mascarenhas; Raja Muthupillai; Benjamin Cheong; Mercedes Pereyra; Scott D Flamm Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 3.959