OBJECTIVE: This study compares single breath-hold 3D cine steady-state free precession (SSFP) MRI using sensitivity encoding (SENSE) with standard 2D cine SSFP imaging in the quantitative evaluation of global left ventricular (LV) function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The LV function of 22 healthy volunteers and 15 patients was evaluated using a standard 2D SSFP sequence and a 3D SSFP sequence with SENSE at 1.5 T. Ventricular volume, ejection fraction, and LV mass were calculated with each method, and signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) and myocardium-to-blood contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were measured. Agreement between the two methods was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis, and results were compared using a paired Student's t test (p < 0.05). The local institutional review board approved the study protocol, and all participants gave signed informed consent. The study complied with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. RESULTS: Both techniques produced similar estimates of ejection fraction (mean bias +/- SD, -1.2% +/- 3.6%) and LV mass (mean bias, +/- SD-1.2 +/- 10.9 g). No significant differences were found in calculated volumes, ejection fraction, or LV mass between the two methods. Acquisition time was reduced by 82%, to a single breath-hold (18 +/- 3 seconds), with the 3D SSFP technique. SNR and CNR were significantly lower with the 3D method than with the standard method. CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional SSFP imaging with SENSE can reduce acquisition time to a single breath-hold and can provide LV function quantification comparable to that obtained with conventional 2D SSFP imaging.
OBJECTIVE: This study compares single breath-hold 3D cine steady-state free precession (SSFP) MRI using sensitivity encoding (SENSE) with standard 2D cine SSFP imaging in the quantitative evaluation of global left ventricular (LV) function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The LV function of 22 healthy volunteers and 15 patients was evaluated using a standard 2D SSFP sequence and a 3D SSFP sequence with SENSE at 1.5 T. Ventricular volume, ejection fraction, and LV mass were calculated with each method, and signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) and myocardium-to-blood contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were measured. Agreement between the two methods was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis, and results were compared using a paired Student's t test (p < 0.05). The local institutional review board approved the study protocol, and all participants gave signed informed consent. The study complied with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. RESULTS: Both techniques produced similar estimates of ejection fraction (mean bias +/- SD, -1.2% +/- 3.6%) and LV mass (mean bias, +/- SD-1.2 +/- 10.9 g). No significant differences were found in calculated volumes, ejection fraction, or LV mass between the two methods. Acquisition time was reduced by 82%, to a single breath-hold (18 +/- 3 seconds), with the 3D SSFP technique. SNR and CNR were significantly lower with the 3D method than with the standard method. CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional SSFP imaging with SENSE can reduce acquisition time to a single breath-hold and can provide LV function quantification comparable to that obtained with conventional 2D SSFP imaging.
Authors: L Manganaro; S Savelli; M Di Maurizio; A Francioso; F Fierro; A Tomei; F Coratella; L Ballesio; F Ventriglia Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2009-07-01 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Michael L Chuang; Philimon Gona; Carol J Salton; Susan B Yeon; Kraig V Kissinger; Susan J Blease; Daniel Levy; Christopher J O'Donnell; Warren J Manning Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2012-02-28 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Jing Liu; Li Feng; Hsin-Wei Shen; Chengcheng Zhu; Yan Wang; Kanae Mukai; Gabriel C Brooks; Karen Ordovas; David Saloner Journal: MAGMA Date: 2017-01-24 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Antonio de Marvao; Timothy J W Dawes; Wenzhe Shi; Christopher Minas; Niall G Keenan; Tamara Diamond; Giuliana Durighel; Giovanni Montana; Daniel Rueckert; Stuart A Cook; Declan P O'Regan Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2014-02-03 Impact factor: 5.364