Literature DB >> 26899899

Development and testing of an automated computer tablet-based method for self-testing of high and low contrast near visual acuity in ophthalmic patients.

Tariq M Aslam1,2,3, Neil R A Parry2,4, Ian J Murray2,5, Mahani Salleh4, Caterina Dal Col1, Naznin Mirza1, Gabriela Czanner6, Humza J Tahir7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Many eye diseases require on-going assessment for optimal management, creating an ever-increasing burden on patients and hospitals that could potentially be reduced through home vision monitoring. However, there is limited evidence for the utility of current applications and devices for this. To address this, we present a new automated, computer tablet-based method for self-testing near visual acuity (VA) for both high and low contrast targets. We report on its reliability and agreement with gold standard measures.
METHODS: The Mobile Assessment of Vision by intERactIve Computer (MAVERIC) system consists of a calibrated computer tablet housed in a bespoke viewing chamber. Purpose-built software automatically elicits touch-screen responses from subjects to measure their near VA for either low or high contrast acuity. Near high contrast acuity was measured using both the MAVERIC system and a near Landolt C chart in one eye for 81 patients and low contrast acuity using the MAVERIC system and a 25 % contrast near EDTRS chart in one eye of a separate 95 patients. The MAVERIC near acuity was also retested after 20 min to evaluate repeatability.
RESULTS: Repeatability of both high and low contrast MAVERIC acuity measures, and their agreement with the chart tests, was assessed using the Bland-Altman comparison method. One hundred and seventy-three patients (96 %) completed the self- testing MAVERIC system without formal assistance. The resulting MAVERIC vision demonstrated good repeatability and good agreement with the gold-standard near chart measures.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the potential utility of the MAVERIC system for patients with ophthalmic disease to self-test their high and low contrast VA. The technique has a high degree of reliability and agreement with gold standard chart based measurements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low contrast acuity; Psychophysics; Self-testing; Tablet computer; Visual acuity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26899899     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-016-3293-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  22 in total

1.  Computerized method of visual acuity testing: adaptation of the amblyopia treatment study visual acuity testing protocol.

Authors:  P S Moke; A H Turpin; R W Beck; J M Holmes; M X Repka; E E Birch; R W Hertle; R T Kraker; J M Miller; C A Johnson
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 2.  Statistical strategies to assess reliability in ophthalmology.

Authors:  N Patton; T Aslam; G Murray
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2005-12-02       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  A pilot trial of the iPad tablet computer as a portable device for visual acuity testing.

Authors:  Zhao-tian Zhang; Shao-chong Zhang; Xiong-gao Huang; Ling-yi Liang
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 6.184

4.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Reliability of visual acuity measurements taken with a notebook and a tablet computer in participants who were illiterate to Roman characters.

Authors:  Paisan Ruamviboonsuk; Napitchareeya Sudsakorn; Thanapong Somkijrungroj; Chayanee Engkagul; Montip Tiensuwan
Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai       Date:  2012-03

6.  Assessment of visual impairment in stroke survivors.

Authors:  C M Tarbert; I A T Livingstone; A J Weir
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2014

7.  Self-administered automatic sight-testing. A feasibility study.

Authors:  V M Reading; R A Weale
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  An assessment of the iPad as a testing platform for distance visual acuity in adults.

Authors:  J M Black; R J Jacobs; G Phillips; L Chen; E Tan; A Tran; B Thompson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Optimisation and assessment of three modern touch screen tablet computers for clinical vision testing.

Authors:  Humza J Tahir; Ian J Murray; Neil R A Parry; Tariq M Aslam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Guidelines for the management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration by the European Society of Retina Specialists (EURETINA).

Authors:  Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth; Victor Chong; Anat Loewenstein; Michael Larsen; Eric Souied; Reinier Schlingemann; Bora Eldem; Jordi Monés; Gisbert Richard; Francesco Bandello
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.638

View more
  10 in total

1.  A world of change in the editorial office.

Authors:  Diana Epstein
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Severity of Visual Field Loss at First Presentation to Glaucoma Clinics in England and Tanzania.

Authors:  Pete R Jones; Heiko Philippin; William U Makupa; Matthew J Burton; David P Crabb
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 1.648

3.  Portable Perimetry Using Eye-Tracking on a Tablet Computer-A Feasibility Assessment.

Authors:  Pete R Jones; Nicholas D Smith; Wei Bi; David P Crabb
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 3.283

4.  Evaluation of Tablet-Based Tests of Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity in Older Adults.

Authors:  Varshini Varadaraj; Lama Assi; Prateek Gajwani; Madison Wahl; Jenina David; Bonnielin K Swenor; Joshua R Ehrlich
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2020-11-13

Review 5.  Android mobile applications in eye care.

Authors:  Siddharth Karuppasamy Karthikeyan; Rajesh Thangarajan; Nagarajan Theruvedhi; Krithica Srinivasan
Journal:  Oman J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019 May-Aug

6.  Undermining a common language: smartphone applications for eye emergencies.

Authors:  Jennifer M Charlesworth; Myriam A Davidson
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2019-01-15

7.  Refinement and preliminary evaluation of two tablet-based tests of real-world visual function.

Authors:  Pete R Jones; Iris Tigchelaar; Giorgia Demaria; Iain Wilson; Wei Bi; Deanna J Taylor; David P Crabb
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 8.  Portable hardware & software technologies for addressing ophthalmic health disparities: A systematic review.

Authors:  Margarita Labkovich; Megan Paul; Eliott Kim; Randal A Serafini; Shreyas Lakhtakia; Aly A Valliani; Andrew J Warburton; Aashay Patel; Davis Zhou; Bonnie Sklar; James Chelnis; Ebrahim Elahi
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2022-05-06

9.  Development and validation of a new method for visual acuity assesment on tablet in pediatric population: eMOVA test.

Authors:  Noémie Stoll; Elsa Di Foggia; Claude Speeg-Schatz; Hélène Meunier; Adam Rimele; Pascal Ancé; Pierre-Henri Moreau; Arnaud Sauer
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 10.  A critical review: Psychophysical assessments of diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  Xing D Chen; Thomas W Gardner
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 6.048

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.