| Literature DB >> 26885405 |
Martha M Shiell1, François Champoux2, Robert J Zatorre1.
Abstract
After sensory loss, the deprived cortex can reorganize to process information from the remaining modalities, a phenomenon known as cross-modal reorganization. In blind people this cross-modal processing supports compensatory behavioural enhancements in the nondeprived modalities. Deaf people also show some compensatory visual enhancements, but a direct relationship between these abilities and cross-modally reorganized auditory cortex has only been established in an animal model, the congenitally deaf cat, and not in humans. Using T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, we measured cortical thickness in the planum temporale, Heschl's gyrus and sulcus, the middle temporal area MT+, and the calcarine sulcus, in early-deaf persons. We tested for a correlation between this measure and visual motion detection thresholds, a visual function where deaf people show enhancements as compared to hearing. We found that the cortical thickness of a region in the right hemisphere planum temporale, typically an auditory region, was greater in deaf individuals with better visual motion detection thresholds. This same region has previously been implicated in functional imaging studies as important for functional reorganization. The structure-behaviour correlation observed here demonstrates this area's involvement in compensatory vision and indicates an anatomical correlate, increased cortical thickness, of cross-modal plasticity.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26885405 PMCID: PMC4738967 DOI: 10.1155/2016/7217630
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neural Plast ISSN: 1687-5443 Impact factor: 3.599
Figure 1Partial correlation between mean cortical thickness in the left (a) and right (b) PTR and visual motion detection thresholds in deaf people after controlling for age. In the right PTR but not in the left, cortical thickness correlated with visual motion detection thresholds.
Dataset for testing the correlation between cortical thickness and visual motion detection thresholds, controlling for participant age.
| Participant | Age (years) | Motion detection threshold (deg./s) | Mean cortical thickness (mm) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Left hemisphere | Right hemisphere | |||||||||
| CS | MT+ | HGS | PTR | CS | MT+ | HGS | PTR | |||
| 1 | 30 | 0.23 | 2.23 | 2.33 | 2.83 | 2.5 | 2.19 | 2.45 | 2.84 | 2.72 |
| 2 | 26 | 0.17 | 1.98 | 2.34 | 2.5 | 2.47 | 2.06 | 2.49 | 2.57 | 2.72 |
| 3 | 24 | 0.20 | 1.85 | 2.39 | 2.53 | 2.28 | 1.88 | 2.52 | 2.37 | 2.55 |
| 4 | 23 | 0.25 | 2.04 | 2.32 | 2.79 | 2.39 | 2.03 | 2.46 | 2.24 | 2.44 |
| 5 | 34 | 0.15 | 2.04 | 2.28 | 2.53 | 2.26 | 2.21 | 2.26 | 2.54 | 2.56 |
| 6 | 21 | 0.18 | 2.03 | 2.30 | 2.62 | 2.41 | 1.98 | 2.36 | 2.54 | 2.84 |
| 7 | 32 | 0.15 | 1.97 | 2.31 | 2.55 | 2.44 | 2.08 | 2.43 | 2.75 | 2.96 |
| 8 | 25 | 0.13 | 1.97 | 2.45 | 2.68 | 2.4 | 2.15 | 2.40 | 3.17 | 2.99 |
| 9 | 25 | 0.17 | 2.04 | 2.50 | 2.85 | 2.58 | 2.33 | 2.53 | 2.78 | 2.95 |
| 10 | 37 | 0.14 | 1.76 | 2.36 | 2.55 | 2.48 | 2.03 | 2.35 | 2.61 | 2.62 |
| 11 | 33 | 0.16 | 1.96 | 2.21 | 2.49 | 2.35 | 2.14 | 2.35 | 2.44 | 2.62 |
CS, calcarine sulcus; MT+, middle temporal area; HGS, Heschl's gyrus and sulcus; PTR, planum temporale region.
Figure 2Visual motion detection thresholds in the right PTR predict cortical thickness (blue region). The region of the effect was first identified in the right PTR ROI (white outline) according to our a priori hypothesis and then expanded to include all vertices at p < 0.01, in order to explore its location when unbounded by the ROI.
Figure 3Overlap (red) between the region in the right PTR where cortical thickness predicts visual motion detection thresholds (blue + red) and a region of visual motion-related cross-modal activity in deaf people from Shiell et al. (2015) [25] (green + red).
Figure 4Mean cortical thickness of the right hemisphere planum temporale region. Horizontal bars indicate group means. Cortical thickness in the deaf group was not different from a hearing group matched for age and gender, taken from Shiell et al. (2014) [12].