Literature DB >> 31407782

Hemispheric Asymmetries in Deaf and Hearing During Sustained Peripheral Selective Attention.

O Scott Gwinn1,2, Fang Jiang1.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that compared to hearing individuals, early deaf individuals allocate relatively more attention to the periphery than central visual field. However, it is not clear whether these two groups also differ in their ability to selectively attend to specific peripheral locations. We examined deaf and hearing participants' selective attention using electroencephalography (EEG) and a frequency tagging paradigm, in which participants attended to one of two peripheral displays of moving dots that changed directions at different rates. Both participant groups showed similar amplifications and reductions in the EEG signal at the attended and unattended frequencies, indicating similar control over their peripheral attention for motion stimuli. However, for deaf participants these effects were larger in a right hemispheric region of interest (ROI), while for hearing participants these effects were larger in a left ROI. These results contribute to a growing body of evidence for a right hemispheric processing advantage in deaf populations when attending to motion.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31407782      PMCID: PMC6951033          DOI: 10.1093/deafed/enz030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ        ISSN: 1081-4159


  72 in total

Review 1.  Cortical mechanisms of space-based and object-based attentional control.

Authors:  Steven Yantis; John T Serences
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Visual adaptation provides objective electrophysiological evidence of facial identity discrimination.

Authors:  Talia L Retter; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Using frequency tagging to quantify attentional deployment in a visual divided attention task.

Authors:  Paolo Toffanin; Ritske de Jong; Addie Johnson; Sander Martens
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.997

Review 4.  The steady-state visual evoked potential in vision research: A review.

Authors:  Anthony M Norcia; L Gregory Appelbaum; Justin M Ales; Benoit R Cottereau; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 5.  Understanding face perception by means of human electrophysiology.

Authors:  Bruno Rossion
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Some characteristics of average steady-state and transient responses evoked by modulated light.

Authors:  D Regan
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1966-03

7.  Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task: an event-related potential and behavioral study. II. Congenitally deaf adults.

Authors:  H J Neville; D Lawson
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1987-03-10       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Does deafness lead to enhancement of visual spatial cognition in children? Negative evidence from deaf nonsigners.

Authors:  I Parasnis; V Samar; J Bettger; K Sathe
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  1996

9.  The Organization of Working Memory Networks is Shaped by Early Sensory Experience.

Authors:  Velia Cardin; Mary Rudner; Rita F De Oliveira; Josefine Andin; Merina T Su; Lilli Beese; Bencie Woll; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Is visual selective attention in deaf individuals enhanced or deficient? The case of the useful field of view.

Authors:  Matthew W G Dye; Peter C Hauser; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.