Literature DB >> 12960757

Visual stimuli activate auditory cortex in deaf subjects: evidence from MEG.

Eva M Finney1, Brett A Clementz, Gregory Hickok, Karen R Dobkins.   

Abstract

Studies using fMRI have demonstrated that visual stimuli activate auditory cortex in deaf subjects. Given the low temporal resolution of fMRI, it is uncertain whether this activation is associated with initial stimulus processing. Here, we used MEG in deaf and hearing subjects to evaluate whether auditory cortex, devoid of its normal input, comes to serve the visual modality early in the course of stimulus processing. In line with previous findings, visual activity was observed in the auditory cortex of deaf, but not hearing, subjects. This activity occurred within 100-400 ms of stimulus presentation and was primarily over the right hemisphere. These results add to the mounting evidence that removal of one sensory modality in humans leads to neural reorganization of the remaining modalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12960757     DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200308060-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  59 in total

Review 1.  Plasticity in the developing auditory cortex: evidence from children with sensorineural hearing loss and auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Garrett Cardon; Julia Campbell; Anu Sharma
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Altered intra- and inter-regional synchronization of superior temporal cortex in deaf people.

Authors:  Yanyan Li; James R Booth; Danling Peng; Yufeng Zang; Junhong Li; Chaogan Yan; Guosheng Ding
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 3.  Do deaf individuals see better?

Authors:  Daphne Bavelier; Matthew W G Dye; Peter C Hauser
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-10-02       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Vibrotactile activation of the auditory cortices in deaf versus hearing adults.

Authors:  Edward T Auer; Lynne E Bernstein; Witaya Sungkarat; Manbir Singh
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  Cross-Modal Plasticity in Higher-Order Auditory Cortex of Congenitally Deaf Cats Does Not Limit Auditory Responsiveness to Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Rüdiger Land; Peter Baumhoff; Jochen Tillein; Stephen G Lomber; Peter Hubka; Andrej Kral
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Sensitive period for white-matter connectivity of superior temporal cortex in deaf people.

Authors:  Yanyan Li; Guosheng Ding; James R Booth; Ruiwang Huang; Yating Lv; Yufeng Zang; Yong He; Danling Peng
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  3D mapping of brain differences in native signing congenitally and prelingually deaf subjects.

Authors:  Natasha Leporé; Patrick Vachon; Franco Lepore; Yi-Yu Chou; Patrice Voss; Caroline C Brun; Agatha D Lee; Arthur W Toga; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Study of functional connectivity in patients with sensorineural hearing loss by using resting-state fMRI.

Authors:  Zhengliang Li; Qingfeng Zhu; Zuojun Geng; Zhenhu Song; Lixin Wang; Ya Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-01-15

Review 9.  Visual skills and cross-modal plasticity in deaf readers: possible implications for acquiring meaning from print.

Authors:  Matthew W G Dye; Peter C Hauser; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Neural organization of linguistic short-term memory is sensory modality-dependent: evidence from signed and spoken language.

Authors:  Judy Pa; Stephen M Wilson; Herbert Pickell; Ursula Bellugi; Gregory Hickok
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.