Literature DB >> 2011460

Simple adaptive testing with the weighted up-down method.

C Kaernbach1.   

Abstract

This paper proposes a method for adaptive testing that is less complicated than the commonly used transformed up-down methods (1 up 2 down, 1 up 3 down, etc.). In addition, the weighted up-down method can converge to any desired point of the psychometric function. The rule is very simple: Each correct response leads to a decrease in signal level, each incorrect response to an increase. The only difference from the simple up-down method (1 up 1 down) is that the steps upward and the steps downward are of a different size. The straightforward construction of the novel procedure pays off in efficiency and stability: A Monte Carlo simulation reveals a definite advantage, though small, of the weighted up-down method over the 1-up-2-down rule.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2011460     DOI: 10.3758/bf03214307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  127 in total

1.  Dynamic sensory sensitivity and children's word decoding skills.

Authors:  J B Talcott; C Witton; M F McLean; P C Hansen; A Rees; G G Green; J F Stein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Links between conscious awareness and response inhibition: evidence from masked priming.

Authors:  Martin Eimer; Friederike Schlaghecken
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-09

3.  Aspects of temporal information processing: a dimensional analysis.

Authors:  Thomas H Rammsayer; Susanne Brandler
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-01-31

4.  Adaptive bandwidth measurements of importance functions for speech intelligibility prediction.

Authors:  Nathaniel A Whitmal; Kristina DeRoy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  When response inhibition is followed by response reengagement: an event-related fMRI study.

Authors:  Maren Boecker; Barbara Drueke; Verena Vorhold; Andre Knops; Bernd Philippen; Siegfried Gauggel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Stimulus uncertainty and insensitivity to pitch-change direction.

Authors:  Samuel R Mathias; Christophe Micheyl; Peter J Bailey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Correlations Between Pitch and Phoneme Perception in Cochlear Implant Users and Their Normal Hearing Peers.

Authors:  Raymond L Goldsworthy
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-15

8.  Stimulus competition mediates the joint effects of spatial and feature-based attention.

Authors:  Alex L White; Martin Rolfs; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  An evaluation of psychophysical models of auditory change perception.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Christian Kaernbach; Laurent Demany
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Examination of force discrimination in human upper limb amputees with reinnervated limb sensation following peripheral nerve transfer.

Authors:  Jonathon W Sensinger; Aimee E Schultz; Todd A Kuiken
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 3.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.