Literature DB >> 26872998

Minimum number of trials required for within- and between-session reliability of TMS measures of corticospinal excitability.

M R Goldsworthy1, B Hordacre2, M C Ridding2.   

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-elicited motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) exhibit considerable trial-to-trial variability, potentially reducing the sensitivity and reproducibility of this measure. While increasing the number of trials will improve accuracy, prolonged recording blocks are not always feasible. In this study, we investigated the minimum number of trials required to provide a measure of human corticospinal excitability that is stable both within and between sessions. Single-pulse TMS was applied to the left primary motor cortex, and MEPs were recorded from the right first dorsal interosseous muscle. Approximately 20-30 trials were required to provide a stable measure of MEP amplitude with high within- and between-session reliability. Extending the number of trials beyond 30 provided no additional benefit. Collecting 30 trials may be optimal for reliably estimating corticospinal excitability using TMS. These findings may have significant implications for using TMS to measure corticospinal excitability in both basic and clinical research settings.
Copyright © 2016 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  between-session reliability; motor-evoked potential; primary motor cortex; transcranial magnetic stimulation; within-session reliability

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26872998     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  50 in total

1.  Remote muscle priming anodal transcranial direct current stimulation attenuates short interval intracortical inhibition and increases time to task failure of a constant workload cycling exercise.

Authors:  Simranjit K Sidhu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Pre-stimulus theta power is correlated with variation of motor evoked potential latency: a single-pulse TMS study.

Authors:  Zafer İşcan; Aaron Schurger; Marine Vernet; Jacobo D Sitt; Antoni Valero-Cabré
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Reliability of diaphragmatic motor-evoked potentials induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Joseph F Welch; Patrick J Argento; Gordon S Mitchell; Emily J Fox
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2020-10-08

4.  Corticospinal excitability is modulated by distinct movement patterns during action observation.

Authors:  M K Huntley; S Muller; Ann-Maree Vallence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Neuroplasticity and network connectivity of the motor cortex following stroke: A transcranial direct current stimulation study.

Authors:  Brenton Hordacre; Bahar Moezzi; Michael C Ridding
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Long-interval intracortical inhibition as biomarker for epilepsy: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Prisca R Bauer; Annika A de Goede; William M Stern; Adam D Pawley; Fahmida A Chowdhury; Robert M Helling; Romain Bouet; Stiliyan N Kalitzin; Gerhard H Visser; Sanjay M Sisodiya; John C Rothwell; Mark P Richardson; Michel J A M van Putten; Josemir W Sander
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Neural mechanism of selective finger movement independent of synergistic movement.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Aoyama; Fuminari Kaneko; Yukari Ohashi; Yutaka Kohno
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Test-retest reliability of short-interval intracortical inhibition and intracortical facilitation in patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Xiaoming Du; L Elliot Hong
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 3.222

9.  Online Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocol for Measuring Cortical Physiology Associated with Response Inhibition.

Authors:  Michael D Guthrie; Donald L Gilbert; David A Huddleston; Ernest V Pedapati; Paul S Horn; Stewart H Mostofsky; Steve W Wu
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 1.355

10.  Large-scale analysis of interindividual variability in theta-burst stimulation data: Results from the 'Big TMS Data Collaboration'.

Authors:  Daniel T Corp; Hannah G K Bereznicki; Gillian M Clark; George J Youssef; Peter J Fried; Ali Jannati; Charlotte B Davies; Joyce Gomes-Osman; Julie Stamm; Sung Wook Chung; Steven J Bowe; Nigel C Rogasch; Paul B Fitzgerald; Giacomo Koch; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Peter G Enticott
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 8.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.