Literature DB >> 31741000

Neural mechanism of selective finger movement independent of synergistic movement.

Toshiyuki Aoyama1, Fuminari Kaneko2, Yukari Ohashi3, Yutaka Kohno4.   

Abstract

Muscle synergy is important for simplifying functional movement, which constitutes spatiotemporal patterns of activity across muscles. To execute selective finger movements that are independent of synergistic movement patterns, we hypothesized that inhibitory neural activity is necessary to suppress enslaved finger movement caused by synergist muscles. To test this hypothesis, we focused on a pair of synergist muscles used in the hand opening movement, namely the index finger abductor and little finger abductor (abductor digiti minimi; ADM), and examined whether inhibitory neural activity in ADM occurs during selective index finger abduction/adduction movements and/or its imagery using transcranial magnetic stimulation and F-wave analysis. During the index finger adduction movement, background EMG activity, F-wave persistence, and motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude in ADM were elevated. However, during the index finger abduction movement, ADM MEP amplitude remained unchanged despite increased background EMG activity and F-wave persistence. These results suggest that increased spinal excitability in ADM is counterbalanced by cortical-mediated inhibition only during selective index finger abduction movement. This assumption was further supported by the results of motor imagery experiments. Although F-wave persistence in ADM increased only during motor imagery of index finger abduction, ADM MEP amplitude during motor imagery of index finger abduction was significantly lower than that during adduction. Overall, our findings indicate that cortical-mediated inhibition contributes to the execution of selective finger movements that are independent of synergistic hand movement patterns.

Entities:  

Keywords:  F-wave; Hand synergy; Inhibitory neural activity; Selective finger movement; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31741000     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-019-05693-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  47 in total

1.  The effect on corticospinal volleys of reversing the direction of current induced in the motor cortex by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  V Di Lazzaro; A Oliviero; E Saturno; F Pilato; A Insola; P Mazzone; P Profice; P Tonali; J C Rothwell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Role of intracortical inhibition in selective hand muscle activation.

Authors:  Cathy M Stinear; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-01-02       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Surround inhibition in human motor system.

Authors:  Young H Sohn; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-05-14       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Minimum number of trials required for within- and between-session reliability of TMS measures of corticospinal excitability.

Authors:  M R Goldsworthy; B Hordacre; M C Ridding
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  An increase in cortical excitability with no change in spinal excitability during motor imagery.

Authors:  S Yahagi; K Shimura; T Kasai
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1996-08

6.  The effect of current direction induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation on the corticospinal excitability in human brain.

Authors:  K Kaneko; S Kawai; Y Fuchigami; H Morita; A Ofuji
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-12

7.  Difference in phase modulation of corticospinal excitability during the observation of the action of walking, with and without motor imagery.

Authors:  Naotsugu Kaneko; Yohei Masugi; Hikaru Yokoyama; Kimitaka Nakazawa
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 1.837

8.  Modulation of a motor evoked response to transcranial magnetic stimulation by the activity level of the first dorsal interosseous muscle in humans when grasping a stationary object with different grip widths.

Authors:  Y Hasegaw; T Kasai; H Kinoshita; S Yahagi
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2001-02-16       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Brain regions controlling nonsynergistic versus synergistic movement of the digits: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  H Henrik Ehrsson; Johann P Kuhtz-Buschbeck; Hans Forssberg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Incomplete functional subdivision of the human multitendoned finger muscle flexor digitorum profundus: an electromyographic study.

Authors:  Karen T Reilly; Marc H Schieber
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-06-18       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  2 in total

1.  Thenar Muscle Motor Imagery Increases Spinal Motor Neuron Excitability of the Abductor Digiti Minimi Muscle.

Authors:  Yoshibumi Bunno; Toshiaki Suzuki
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  A novel tablet-based application for assessment of manual dexterity and its components: a reliability and validity study in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Ayah Rabah; Quentin Le Boterff; Loïc Carment; Narjes Bendjemaa; Maxime Térémetz; Lucile Dupin; Macarena Cuenca; Jean-Louis Mas; Marie-Odile Krebs; Marc A Maier; Påvel G Lindberg
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 4.262

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.