Literature DB >> 29340584

Long-interval intracortical inhibition as biomarker for epilepsy: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Prisca R Bauer1,2, Annika A de Goede3, William M Stern1,4, Adam D Pawley5, Fahmida A Chowdhury1,5, Robert M Helling2,6, Romain Bouet7, Stiliyan N Kalitzin2,6, Gerhard H Visser2, Sanjay M Sisodiya1,4, John C Rothwell1, Mark P Richardson5, Michel J A M van Putten3,8, Josemir W Sander1,2,4.   

Abstract

Cortical excitability, as measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with electromyography, is a potential biomarker for the diagnosis and follow-up of epilepsy. We report on long-interval intracortical inhibition data measured in four different centres in healthy controls (n = 95), subjects with refractory genetic generalized epilepsy (n = 40) and with refractory focal epilepsy (n = 69). Long-interval intracortical inhibition was measured by applying two supra-threshold stimuli with an interstimulus interval of 50, 100, 150, 200 and 250 ms and calculating the ratio between the response to the second (test stimulus) and to the first (conditioning stimulus). In all subjects, the median response ratio showed inhibition at all interstimulus intervals. Using a mixed linear-effects model, we compared the long-interval intracortical inhibition response ratios between the different subject types. We conducted two analyses; one including data from the four centres and one excluding data from Centre 2, as the methods in this centre differed from the others. In the first analysis, we found no differences in long-interval intracortical inhibition between the different subject types. In all subjects, the response ratios at interstimulus intervals 100 and 150 ms showed significantly more inhibition than the response ratios at 50, 200 and 250 ms. Our second analysis showed a significant interaction between interstimulus interval and subject type (P = 0.0003). Post hoc testing showed significant differences between controls and refractory focal epilepsy at interstimulus intervals of 100 ms (P = 0.02) and 200 ms (P = 0.04). There were no significant differences between controls and refractory generalized epilepsy groups or between the refractory generalized and focal epilepsy groups. Our results do not support the body of previous work that suggests that long-interval intracortical inhibition is significantly reduced in refractory focal and genetic generalized epilepsy. Results from the second analysis are even in sharper contrast with previous work, showing inhibition in refractory focal epilepsy at 200 ms instead of facilitation previously reported. Methodological differences, especially shorter intervals between the pulse pairs, may have contributed to our inability to reproduce previous findings. Based on our results, we suggest that long-interval intracortical inhibition as measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation and electromyography is unlikely to have clinical use as a biomarker of epilepsy.
© The Author(s) (2018). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LICI; TMS; cortical excitability; paired pulse; refractory

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29340584      PMCID: PMC5837684          DOI: 10.1093/brain/awx343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  70 in total

1.  Modulation of intracortical excitability for different muscles in the upper extremity: paired magnetic stimulation study with focal versus non-focal coils.

Authors:  T Shimizu; M M Filippi; M G Palmieri; M Oliveri; F Vernieri; P Pasqualetti; P M Rossini
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Interactions between two different inhibitory systems in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  T D Sanger; R R Garg; R Chen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 3.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurology.

Authors:  Masahito Kobayashi; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 44.182

4.  A comparison of two methods in acquiring stimulus-response curves with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Alan J Pearce; Ross A Clark; Dawson J Kidgell
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 8.955

5.  Late cortical disinhibition in relaxed versus active hand muscles.

Authors:  A Caux-Dedeystère; P Derambure; H Devanne
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 6.  Single and paired pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation in drug naïve epilepsy.

Authors:  Annika A de Goede; Esther M Ter Braack; Michel J A M van Putten
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Cortical excitability and refractory epilepsy: a three-year longitudinal transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Radwa A B Badawy; Graeme D Jackson; Samuel F Berkovic; Richard A L Macdonell
Journal:  Int J Neural Syst       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 5.866

8.  Cortical excitability and recovery curve analysis in generalized epilepsy.

Authors:  A Brodtmann; R A Macdonell; A K Gilligan; J Curatolo; S F Berkovic
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1999-10-12       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Capturing the epileptic trait: cortical excitability measures in patients and their unaffected siblings.

Authors:  Radwa A B Badawy; Simon J Vogrin; Alan Lai; Mark J Cook
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Impaired intracortical inhibition demonstrated in vivo in people with Dravet syndrome.

Authors:  William M Stern; Josemir W Sander; John C Rothwell; Sanjay M Sisodiya
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  7 in total

1.  The impact of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) on seizure course in people with and without epilepsy.

Authors:  Serena Pang; Sasha D'Ambrosio; Giulia Battaglia; Diego Jiménez-Jiménez; Marco Perulli; Katri Silvennoinen; Sara Zagaglia; Sanjay M Sisodiya; Simona Balestrini
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2022-06-13

2.  Investigating the molecular mechanism of Compound Danshen Dropping Pills for the treatment of epilepsy by utilizing network pharmacology and molecular docking technology.

Authors:  Dan Huang; Xiaolong Wen; Chuansen Lu; Bo Zhang; Zongjun Fu; Yingliu Huang; Kun Niu; Fan Yang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-02

3.  Tracking cortical excitability dynamics with transcranial magnetic stimulation in focal epilepsy.

Authors:  Robert M Helling; Sharon Shmuely; Prisca R Bauer; Else A Tolner; Gerhard H Visser; Roland D Thijs
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 4.511

4.  Lacosamide-Induced Dyskinesia in Children With Intractable Epilepsy.

Authors:  Nadine Madani; Jennifer A O'Malley; Brenda E Porter; Fiona M Baumer
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 1.987

5.  A Systematic Review of Long-Interval Intracortical Inhibition as a Biomarker in Neuropsychiatric Disorders.

Authors:  Parmis Fatih; M Utku Kucuker; Jennifer L Vande Voort; Deniz Doruk Camsari; Faranak Farzan; Paul E Croarkin
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.157

6.  Influence of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Genotype on Short-Latency Afferent Inhibition and Motor Cortex Metabolites.

Authors:  Ryoki Sasaki; Naofumi Otsuru; Shota Miyaguchi; Sho Kojima; Hiraku Watanabe; Ken Ohno; Noriko Sakurai; Naoki Kodama; Daisuke Sato; Hideaki Onishi
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-03-20

Review 7.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation as a tool to understand genetic conditions associated with epilepsy.

Authors:  Katri Silvennoinen; Simona Balestrini; John C Rothwell; Sanjay M Sisodiya
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 6.740

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.