Literature DB >> 29435605

Corticospinal excitability is modulated by distinct movement patterns during action observation.

M K Huntley1, S Muller1, Ann-Maree Vallence2.   

Abstract

It is well established that excitability of the primary motor cortex increases during action observation. However, the modulation of motor cortex excitability during observation of different actions, with distinct movement patterns, is not fully understood. The aim of the current study was to examine time-dependent changes in corticospinal excitability during observation of two actions with different levels of complexity. We developed videos of two distinct actions (a point and a reach-and-grasp), that were matched in video length, action onset, and onset of kinematics. Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to investigate time-dependent changes in primary motor cortex excitability during observation of the two actions. Motor evoked potentials (MEP) were recorded from two intrinsic hand muscles, namely first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and abductor digiti minimi. Results showed no difference in MEP amplitude during observation of a static hand compared to observation of the actions. When comparing the point to the grasp action, there were two key findings showing time-dependent changes in motor cortex excitability: first, greater MEP amplitude in FDI during observation of the point than the grasp action at an early time-point (index finger extension) and second, greater MEP amplitude in FDI during observation of the grasp than the point action at a later time-point (hand opening to form a grasp). These results show that excitability of the primary motor cortex is differentially modulated during observation of a point and grasp action, suggesting that the action observation network is engaged in a time-dependent manner during action observation.

Keywords:  Action complexity; Action observation; Kinematics; Motor evoked potential; Primary motor cortex; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29435605     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-018-5199-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  36 in total

1.  Phase-specific modulation of cortical motor output during movement observation.

Authors:  M Gangitano; F M Mottaghy; A Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-05-25       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Noninvasive mapping of muscle representations in human motor cortex.

Authors:  E M Wassermann; L M McShane; M Hallett; L G Cohen
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-02

3.  Topographically divergent and convergent connectivity between premotor and primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Numa Dancause; Scott Barbay; Shawn B Frost; Erik J Plautz; Mihai Popescu; Philip M Dixon; Ann M Stowe; Kathleen M Friel; Randolph J Nudo
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  How are observed actions mapped to the observer's motor system? Influence of posture and perspective.

Authors:  Kaat Alaerts; Elke Heremans; Stephan P Swinnen; Nicole Wenderoth
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Timing and specificity of early changes in motor excitability during movement observation.

Authors:  Katherine R Naish; Sukhvinder S Obhi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals modulation of corticospinal excitability when observing actions with the intention to imitate.

Authors:  Robert M Hardwick; Craig J McAllister; Paul S Holmes; Martin G Edwards
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-22       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 7.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research.

Authors:  Simone Rossi; Mark Hallett; Paolo M Rossini; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 8.  Effects of action observation on corticospinal excitability: Muscle specificity, direction, and timing of the mirror response.

Authors:  Katherine R Naish; Carmel Houston-Price; Andrew J Bremner; Nicholas P Holmes
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  BDNF Val66Met Polymorphism Influences Visuomotor Associative Learning and the Sensitivity to Action Observation.

Authors:  Vincent Taschereau-Dumouchel; Sébastien Hétu; Pierre-Emmanuel Michon; Etienne Vachon-Presseau; Elsa Massicotte; Louis De Beaumont; Shirley Fecteau; Judes Poirier; Catherine Mercier; Yvon C Chagnon; Philip L Jackson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Optimization of the transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol by defining a reliable estimate for corticospinal excitability.

Authors:  Koen Cuypers; Herbert Thijs; Raf L J Meesen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Action observation for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke.

Authors:  Lorenna Rdm Borges; Aline Bgs Fernandes; Jacilda Oliveira Dos Passos; Isabelle Ananda Oliveira Rego; Tania F Campos
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-08-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.