Literature DB >> 29553534

Online Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocol for Measuring Cortical Physiology Associated with Response Inhibition.

Michael D Guthrie1, Donald L Gilbert2, David A Huddleston2, Ernest V Pedapati3, Paul S Horn2, Stewart H Mostofsky4, Steve W Wu5.   

Abstract

We describe the development of a reproducible, child-friendly motor response inhibition task suitable for online Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) characterization of primary motor cortex (M1) excitability and inhibition. Motor response inhibition prevents unwanted actions and is abnormal in several neuropsychiatric conditions. TMS is a non-invasive technology that can quantify M1 excitability and inhibition using single- and paired-pulse protocols and can be precisely timed to study cortical physiology with high temporal resolution. We modified the original Slater-Hammel (S-H) stop signal task to create a "racecar" version with TMS pulses time-locked to intra-trial events. This task is self-paced, with each trial initiating after a button push to move the racecar towards the 800 ms target. GO trials require a finger-lift to stop the racecar just before this target. Interspersed randomly are STOP trials (25%) during which the dynamically adjusted stop signal prompts subjects to prevent finger-lift. For GO trials, TMS pulses were delivered at 650 ms after trial onset; whereas, for STOP trials, the TMS pulses occurred 150 ms after the stop signal. The timings of the TMS pulses were decided based on electroencephalography (EEG) studies showing event-related changes in these time ranges during stop signal tasks. This task was studied in 3 blocks at two study sites (n=38) and we recorded behavioral performance and event-related motor-evoked potentials (MEP). Regression modelling was used to analyze MEP amplitudes using age as a covariate with multiple independent variables (sex, study site, block, TMS pulse condition [single- vs. paired-pulse], trial condition [GO, successful STOP, failed STOP]). The analysis showed that TMS pulse condition (p<0.0001) and its interaction with trial condition (p=0.009) were significant. Future applications for this online S-H/TMS paradigm include the addition of simultaneous EEG acquisition to measure TMS-evoked EEG potentials. A potential limitation is that in children, the TMS pulse sound could affect behavioral task performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29553534      PMCID: PMC5912388          DOI: 10.3791/56789

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  42 in total

1.  Human corticospinal excitability evaluated with transcranial magnetic stimulation during different reaction time paradigms.

Authors:  L Leocani; L G Cohen; E M Wassermann; K Ikoma; M Hallett
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Interactions between two different inhibitory systems in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  T D Sanger; R R Garg; R Chen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Human cortical activities during Go/NoGo tasks with opposite motor control paradigms.

Authors:  Kentaro Yamanaka; Toshitaka Kimura; Makoto Miyazaki; Noritaka Kawashima; Daichi Nozaki; Kimitaka Nakazawa; Hideo Yano; Yoshiharu Yamamoto
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11-29       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The relationship between corticospinal excitability during motor imagery and motor imagery ability.

Authors:  Jacqueline Williams; Alan J Pearce; Michela Loporto; Tony Morris; Paul S Holmes
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 5.  TMS and drugs.

Authors:  Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  The effect of test TMS intensity on short-interval intracortical inhibition in different excitability states.

Authors:  M I Garry; R H S Thomson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Corticomotor threshold to magnetic stimulation: normal values and repeatability.

Authors:  K R Mills; K A Nithi
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.217

8.  Prepotent motor activity and inhibitory control demands in different variants of the go/no-go paradigm.

Authors:  Jan R Wessel
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Response suppression by automatic retrieval of stimulus-stop association: evidence from transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Yu-Chin Chiu; Adam R Aron; Frederick Verbruggen
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Altered modulation of intracortical excitability during movement preparation in Gilles de la Tourette syndrome.

Authors:  K-F Heise; B Steven; G Liuzzi; G Thomalla; M Jonas; K Müller-Vahl; P Sauseng; A Münchau; C Gerloff; F C Hummel
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  7 in total

1.  Motor cortex inhibition and modulation in children with ADHD.

Authors:  Donald L Gilbert; David A Huddleston; Steve W Wu; Ernest V Pedapati; Paul S Horn; Kathryn Hirabayashi; Deanna Crocetti; Eric M Wassermann; Stewart H Mostofsky
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Relationship between GABA levels and task-dependent cortical excitability in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Ashley D Harris; Donald L Gilbert; Paul S Horn; Deana Crocetti; Kim M Cecil; Richard A E Edden; David A Huddleston; Stewart H Mostofsky; Nicolaas A J Puts
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  OSARI, an Open-Source Anticipated Response Inhibition Task.

Authors:  Jason L He; Rebecca J Hirst; Rohan Puri; James Coxon; Winston Byblow; Mark Hinder; Patrick Skippen; Dora Matzke; Andrew Heathcote; Corey G Wadsley; Tim Silk; Christian Hyde; Dinisha Parmar; Ernest Pedapati; Donald L Gilbert; David A Huddleston; Stewart Mostofsky; Inge Leunissen; Hayley J MacDonald; Nahian S Chowdhury; Matthew Gretton; Tess Nikitenko; Bram Zandbelt; Luke Strickland; Nicolaas A J Puts
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-11-09

4.  Motor cortex facilitation: a marker of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder co-occurrence in autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Ernest V Pedapati; Lindsey N Mooney; Steve W Wu; Craig A Erickson; John A Sweeney; Rebecca C Shaffer; Paul S Horn; Logan K Wink; Donald L Gilbert
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 6.222

5.  EEG Correlates of Active Stopping and Preparation for Stopping in Chronic Tic Disorder.

Authors:  Alonso Zea Vera; Ernest V Pedapati; Travis R Larsh; Kevin Kohmescher; Makoto Miyakoshi; David A Huddleston; Hannah S Jackson; Donald L Gilbert; Paul S Horn; Steve W Wu
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-01-24

6.  Cortical Inhibition and Plasticity in Major Depressive Disorder.

Authors:  Jesminne Castricum; Tom K Birkenhager; Steven A Kushner; Ype Elgersma; Joke H M Tulen
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 4.157

7.  Associations between Task-Related Modulation of Motor-Evoked Potentials and EEG Event-Related Desynchronization in Children with ADHD.

Authors:  Joshua B Ewen; Nicolaas A Puts; Stewart H Mostofsky; Paul S Horn; Donald L Gilbert
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 4.861

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.