Literature DB >> 26870744

Improved pulmonary nodule classification utilizing quantitative lung parenchyma features.

Samantha K N Dilger1, Johanna Uthoff1, Alexandra Judisch2, Emily Hammond1, Sarah L Mott3, Brian J Smith4, John D Newell2, Eric A Hoffman2, Jessica C Sieren1.   

Abstract

Current computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) models for determining pulmonary nodule malignancy characterize nodule shape, density, and border in computed tomography (CT) data. Analyzing the lung parenchyma surrounding the nodule has been minimally explored. We hypothesize that improved nodule classification is achievable by including features quantified from the surrounding lung tissue. To explore this hypothesis, we have developed expanded quantitative CT feature extraction techniques, including volumetric Laws texture energy measures for the parenchyma and nodule, border descriptors using ray-casting and rubber-band straightening, histogram features characterizing densities, and global lung measurements. Using stepwise forward selection and leave-one-case-out cross-validation, a neural network was used for classification. When applied to 50 nodules (22 malignant and 28 benign) from high-resolution CT scans, 52 features (8 nodule, 39 parenchymal, and 5 global) were statistically significant. Nodule-only features yielded an area under the ROC curve of 0.918 (including nodule size) and 0.872 (excluding nodule size). Performance was improved through inclusion of parenchymal (0.938) and global features (0.932). These results show a trend toward increased performance when the parenchyma is included, coupled with the large number of significant parenchymal features that support our hypothesis: the pulmonary parenchyma is influenced differentially by malignant versus benign nodules, assisting CAD-based nodule characterizations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer screening; computed tomography; computer-aided diagnosis; lung cancer; lung nodules; lung parenchyma; texture analysis

Year:  2015        PMID: 26870744      PMCID: PMC4748146          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.2.4.041004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  23 in total

1.  A pattern classification approach to characterizing solitary pulmonary nodules imaged on high resolution CT: preliminary results.

Authors:  M F McNitt-Gray; E M Hart; N Wyckoff; J W Sayre; J G Goldin; D R Aberle
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  The effects of co-occurrence matrix based texture parameters on the classification of solitary pulmonary nodules imaged on computed tomography.

Authors:  M F McNitt-Gray; N Wyckoff; J W Sayre; J G Goldin; D R Aberle
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.790

3.  Usefulness of an artificial neural network for differentiating benign from malignant pulmonary nodules on high-resolution CT: evaluation with receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Authors:  Yuichi Matsuki; Katsumi Nakamura; Hideyuki Watanabe; Takatoshi Aoki; Hajime Nakata; Shigehiko Katsuragawa; Kunio Doi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Computer-aided diagnosis of pulmonary nodules on CT scans: improvement of classification performance with nodule surface features.

Authors:  Ted W Way; Berkman Sahiner; Heang-Ping Chan; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Philip N Cascade; Aamer Chughtai; Naama Bogot; Ella Kazerooni
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  Pulmonary nodule detection, characterization, and management with multidetector computed tomography.

Authors:  Scott Brandman; Jane P Ko
Journal:  J Thorac Imaging       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.000

6.  Computerized characterization of masses on mammograms: the rubber band straightening transform and texture analysis.

Authors:  B Sahiner; H P Chan; N Petrick; M A Helvie; M M Goodsitt
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Determining the likelihood of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules with Bayesian analysis. Part I. Theory.

Authors:  J W Gurney
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  The probability of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules. Application to small radiologically indeterminate nodules.

Authors:  S J Swensen; M D Silverstein; D M Ilstrup; C D Schleck; E S Edell
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1997-04-28

9.  Reproducibility and Prognosis of Quantitative Features Extracted from CT Images.

Authors:  Yoganand Balagurunathan; Yuhua Gu; Hua Wang; Virendra Kumar; Olya Grove; Sam Hawkins; Jongphil Kim; Dmitry B Goldgof; Lawrence O Hall; Robert A Gatenby; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

Review 10.  Development of quantitative computed tomography lung protocols.

Authors:  John D Newell; Jered Sieren; Eric A Hoffman
Journal:  J Thorac Imaging       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.000

View more
  23 in total

1.  Post-imaging pulmonary nodule mathematical prediction models: are they clinically relevant?

Authors:  Johanna Uthoff; Nicholas Koehn; Jared Larson; Samantha K N Dilger; Emily Hammond; Ann Schwartz; Brian Mullan; Rolando Sanchez; Richard M Hoffman; Jessica C Sieren
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Radiomic biomarkers informative of cancerous transformation in neurofibromatosis-1 plexiform tumors.

Authors:  J Uthoff; F A De Stefano; K Panzer; B W Darbro; T S Sato; R Khanna; D E Quelle; D K Meyerholz; J Weimer; J C Sieren
Journal:  J Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.447

3.  Radiomics: a new application from established techniques.

Authors:  Vishwa Parekh; Michael A Jacobs
Journal:  Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev       Date:  2016-03-31

4.  LUNGx Challenge for computerized lung nodule classification.

Authors:  Samuel G Armato; Karen Drukker; Feng Li; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Georgia D Tourassi; Roger M Engelmann; Maryellen L Giger; George Redmond; Keyvan Farahani; Justin S Kirby; Laurence P Clarke
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-12-19

5.  Feature fusion for lung nodule classification.

Authors:  Amal A Farag; Asem Ali; Salwa Elshazly; Aly A Farag
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Lung nodule malignancy classification using only radiologist-quantified image features as inputs to statistical learning algorithms: probing the Lung Image Database Consortium dataset with two statistical learning methods.

Authors:  Matthew C Hancock; Jerry F Magnan
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-12-08

7.  Machine learning approach for distinguishing malignant and benign lung nodules utilizing standardized perinodular parenchymal features from CT.

Authors:  Johanna Uthoff; Matthew J Stephens; John D Newell; Eric A Hoffman; Jared Larson; Nicholas Koehn; Frank A De Stefano; Chrissy M Lusk; Angela S Wenzlaff; Donovan Watza; Christine Neslund-Dudas; Laurie L Carr; David A Lynch; Ann G Schwartz; Jessica C Sieren
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 8.  Low-Dose CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Evidence from 2 Decades of Study.

Authors:  David S Gierada; William C Black; Caroline Chiles; Paul F Pinsky; David F Yankelevitz
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2020-03-27

Review 9.  Clinical applications of textural analysis in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Iain Phillips; Mazhar Ajaz; Veni Ezhil; Vineet Prakash; Sheaka Alobaidli; Sarah J McQuaid; Christopher South; James Scuffham; Andrew Nisbet; Philip Evans
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  A Comparative Texture Analysis Based on NECT and CECT Images to Differentiate Lung Adenocarcinoma from Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Han Liu; Bin Jing; Wenjuan Han; Zhuqing Long; Xiao Mo; Haiyun Li
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 4.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.