Literature DB >> 26866657

Prediction in the processing of repair disfluencies: Evidence from the visual-world paradigm.

Matthew W Lowder1, Fernanda Ferreira1.   

Abstract

Two visual-world eye-tracking experiments investigated the role of prediction in the processing of repair disfluencies (e.g., "The chef reached for some salt uh I mean some ketchup . . ."). Experiment 1 showed that listeners were more likely to fixate a critical distractor item (e.g., pepper) during the processing of repair disfluencies compared with the processing of coordination structures (e.g., ". . . some salt and also some ketchup . . ."). Experiment 2 replicated the findings of Experiment 1 for disfluency versus coordination constructions and also showed that the pattern of fixations to the critical distractor for disfluency constructions was similar to the fixation patterns for sentences employing contrastive focus (e.g., ". . . not some salt but rather some ketchup . . ."). The results suggest that similar mechanisms underlie the processing of repair disfluencies and contrastive focus, with listeners generating sets of entities that stand in semantic contrast to the reparandum in the case of disfluencies or the negated entity in the case of contrastive focus. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26866657      PMCID: PMC4981572          DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  43 in total

Review 1.  Prediction during language comprehension: benefits, costs, and ERP components.

Authors:  Cyma Van Petten; Barbara J Luka
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.997

2.  Early occipital sensitivity to syntactic category is based on form typicality.

Authors:  Suzanne Dikker; Hugh Rabagliati; Thomas A Farmer; Liina Pylkkänen
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-04-13

3.  Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity.

Authors:  Katherine A DeLong; Thomas P Urbach; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-07-10       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  If you say thee uh you are describing something hard: the on-line attribution of disfluency during reference comprehension.

Authors:  Jennifer E Arnold; Carla L Hudson Kam; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Semantic focus and sentence comprehension.

Authors:  A Cutler; J A Fodor
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1979-03

6.  The coordinated interplay of scene, utterance, and world knowledge: evidence from eye tracking.

Authors:  Pia Knoeferle; Matthew W Crocker
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-05-06

7.  Effects of prediction and contextual support on lexical processing: prediction takes precedence.

Authors:  Trevor Brothers; Tamara Y Swaab; Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-12-08

8.  A basis for generating expectancies for verbs from nouns.

Authors:  Ken McRae; Mary Hare; Jeffrey L Elman; Todd Ferretti
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-10

9.  What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension?

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 2.331

10.  Newness, Givenness and Discourse Updating: Evidence from Eye Movements.

Authors:  Ashley Benatar; Charles Clifton
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 3.059

View more
  2 in total

1.  Temporary ambiguity and memory for the context of spoken language.

Authors:  Kaitlin Lord; Sarah Brown-Schmidt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-03-30

2.  Processing of Self-Repairs in Stuttered and Non-Stuttered Speech.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Nathan D Maxfield; Fernanda Ferreira
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 2.331

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.