Literature DB >> 24376304

Newness, Givenness and Discourse Updating: Evidence from Eye Movements.

Ashley Benatar1, Charles Clifton1.   

Abstract

Three experiments examined the effect of contextual givenness on eye movements in reading, following Schwarzschild's (1999) analysis of givenness and focus-marking in which relations among entities as well as the entities themselves can be given. In each study, a context question was followed by an answer in which a critical word was either given, new, or contrastively (correctively) focused. Target words were read faster when the critical word provided given information than when it provided new information, and faster when it provided new information than when it corrected prior information. Repetition of target words was controlled in two ways: by mentioning a non-given target word in the context in a relation other than that in which it occurred as a target, and by using a synonym or subordinate of a given target to refer to it in the context question. Verbatim repetition was not responsible for the observed effects of givenness and contrastiveness. Besides clarifying previous inconsistent results of the effects of focus and givenness on reading speed, these results indicate that reading speed can be influenced essentially immediately by a reader's discourse representation, and that the extent of the influence is graded, with corrections to a representation having a larger effect than simple additions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  discourse representation; discourse updating; focus; givenness; information status; reading

Year:  2014        PMID: 24376304      PMCID: PMC3873159          DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mem Lang        ISSN: 0749-596X            Impact factor:   3.059


  14 in total

1.  Priming in sentence processing: intralexical spreading activation, schemas, and situation models.

Authors:  M J Traxler; D J Foss; R E Seely; B Kaup; R K Morris
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2000-11

2.  Effects of syntactic prominence on eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Stacy Birch; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-09

3.  The effect of plausibility on eye movements in reading.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Tessa Warren; Barbara J Juhasz; Simon P Liversedge
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Linguistic focus and memory: an eye movement study.

Authors:  Peter Ward; Patrick Sturt
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-01

5.  Repeated text in unrelated passages: Repetition versus meaning selection effects.

Authors:  Celia M Klin; April M Drumm; Angela S Ralano
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-07

6.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.

Authors:  Dale J Barr; Roger Levy; Christoph Scheepers; Harry J Tily
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  Word frequency effects and eye movements during two readings of a text.

Authors:  G E Raney; K Rayner
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  1995-06

8.  Semantic focus and sentence comprehension.

Authors:  A Cutler; J A Fodor
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1979-03

9.  The English Lexicon Project.

Authors:  David A Balota; Melvin J Yap; Michael J Cortese; Keith A Hutchison; Brett Kessler; Bjorn Loftis; James H Neely; Douglas L Nelson; Greg B Simpson; Rebecca Treiman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-08

10.  Focus, newness and their combination: processing of information structure in discourse.

Authors:  Lijing Chen; Xingshan Li; Yufang Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Prediction in the Processing of Repair Disfluencies.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Fernanda Ferreira
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 2.331

2.  Focus takes time: structural effects on reading.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

3.  Prediction in the processing of repair disfluencies: Evidence from the visual-world paradigm.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Fernanda Ferreira
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  The manuscript that we finished: structural separation reduces the cost of complement coercion.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  The "exaptation" of linguistic implicit strategies.

Authors:  Edoardo Lombardi Vallauri
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-07-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.