BACKGROUND:Adjuvant tamoxifen therapy is effective for postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer. Cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) enzyme metabolizes tamoxifen to clinically active metabolites, and CYP2D6 polymorphisms may adversely affect tamoxifen efficacy. In this study, we investigated the clinical relevance of CYP2D6 polymorphisms. METHODS: We obtained tumor tissues and isolated DNA from 4861 of 8010 postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer who enrolled in the randomized, phase III double-blind Breast International Group (BIG) 1-98 trial between March 1998 and May 2003 and receivedtamoxifen and/or letrozole treatment. Extracted DNA was used for genotyping nine CYP2D6 single-nucleotide polymorphisms using polymerase chain reaction-based methods. Genotype combinations were used to categorize CYP2D6 metabolism phenotypes as poor, intermediate, and extensive metabolizers (PM, IM, and EM, respectively; n = 4393 patients). Associations of CYP2D6 metabolism phenotypes with breast cancer-free interval (referred to as recurrence) and treatment-induced hot flushes according to randomized endocrine treatment and previous chemotherapy were assessed. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: No association between CYP2D6 metabolism phenotypes and breast cancer-free interval was observed among patients who received tamoxifen monotherapy without previous chemotherapy (P = .35). PM or IM phenotype had a non-statistically significantly reduced risk of breast cancer recurrence compared with EM phenotype (PM or IM vs EM, HR of recurrence = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.60 to 1.24). CYP2D6 metabolism phenotype was associated with tamoxifen-induced hot flushes (P = .020). Both PM and IM phenotypes had an increased risk of tamoxifen-induced hot flushes compared with EM phenotype (PM vs EM, HR of hot flushes = 1.24, 95% CI = 0.96 to 1.59; IM vs EM, HR of hot flushes = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.43). CONCLUSIONS: CYP2D6 phenotypes of reduced enzyme activity were not associated with worse disease control but were associated with increased hot flushes, contrary to the hypothesis. The results of this study do not support using the presence or absence of hot flushes or the pharmacogenetic testing of CYP2D6 to determine whether to treat postmenopausal breast cancer patients withtamoxifen.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Adjuvant tamoxifen therapy is effective for postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer. Cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) enzyme metabolizes tamoxifen to clinically active metabolites, and CYP2D6 polymorphisms may adversely affect tamoxifen efficacy. In this study, we investigated the clinical relevance of CYP2D6 polymorphisms. METHODS: We obtained tumor tissues and isolated DNA from 4861 of 8010 postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer who enrolled in the randomized, phase III double-blind Breast International Group (BIG) 1-98 trial between March 1998 and May 2003 and received tamoxifen and/or letrozole treatment. Extracted DNA was used for genotyping nine CYP2D6 single-nucleotide polymorphisms using polymerase chain reaction-based methods. Genotype combinations were used to categorize CYP2D6 metabolism phenotypes as poor, intermediate, and extensive metabolizers (PM, IM, and EM, respectively; n = 4393 patients). Associations of CYP2D6 metabolism phenotypes with breast cancer-free interval (referred to as recurrence) and treatment-induced hot flushes according to randomized endocrine treatment and previous chemotherapy were assessed. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: No association between CYP2D6 metabolism phenotypes and breast cancer-free interval was observed among patients who received tamoxifen monotherapy without previous chemotherapy (P = .35). PM or IM phenotype had a non-statistically significantly reduced risk of breast cancer recurrence compared with EM phenotype (PM or IM vs EM, HR of recurrence = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.60 to 1.24). CYP2D6 metabolism phenotype was associated with tamoxifen-induced hot flushes (P = .020). Both PM and IM phenotypes had an increased risk of tamoxifen-induced hot flushes compared with EM phenotype (PM vs EM, HR of hot flushes = 1.24, 95% CI = 0.96 to 1.59; IM vs EM, HR of hot flushes = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.43). CONCLUSIONS:CYP2D6 phenotypes of reduced enzyme activity were not associated with worse disease control but were associated with increased hot flushes, contrary to the hypothesis. The results of this study do not support using the presence or absence of hot flushes or the pharmacogenetic testing of CYP2D6 to determine whether to treat postmenopausal breast cancerpatients with tamoxifen.
Authors: Lisa M McShane; Douglas G Altman; Willi Sauerbrei; Sheila E Taube; Massimo Gion; Gary M Clark Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-09-19 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ian E Smith; Mitch Dowsett; Stephen R Ebbs; J Michael Dixon; Anthony Skene; J-U Blohmer; Susan E Ashley; Stephen Francis; Irene Boeddinghaus; Geraldine Walsh Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-07-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Yan Jin; Zeruesenay Desta; Vered Stearns; Bryan Ward; Herbert Ho; Kyung-Hoon Lee; Todd Skaar; Anna Maria Storniolo; Lang Li; Adjei Araba; Rebecca Blanchard; Anne Nguyen; Lynda Ullmer; Jill Hayden; Suzanne Lemler; Richard M Weinshilboum; James M Rae; Daniel F Hayes; David A Flockhart Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2005-01-05 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Vered Stearns; Michael D Johnson; James M Rae; Alan Morocho; Antonella Novielli; Pankaj Bhargava; Daniel F Hayes; Zeruesenay Desta; David A Flockhart Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2003-12-03 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Michael D Johnson; Hong Zuo; Kyung-Hoon Lee; Joseph P Trebley; James Michael Rae; Ross V Weatherman; Zeruesanay Desta; David A Flockhart; Todd C Skaar Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Sarah J Nyante; Mark E Sherman; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Louise A Brinton; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Robert N Hoover; Andrew Glass; Gretchen L Gierach Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2015-02-06 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Daniel L Hertz; Anna C Snavely; Howard L McLeod; Christine M Walko; Joseph G Ibrahim; Steven Anderson; Karen E Weck; Gustav Magrinat; Oludamilola Olajide; Susan Moore; Rachel Raab; Daniel R Carrizosa; Steven Corso; Garry Schwartz; Jeffrey M Peppercorn; James P Evans; David R Jones; Zeruesenay Desta; David A Flockhart; Lisa A Carey; William J Irvin Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2015-08-02 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Brian Leyland-Jones; Kathryn P Gray; Mark Abramovitz; Mark Bouzyk; Brandon Young; Bradley Long; Roswitha Kammler; Patrizia Dell'Orto; Maria Olivia Biasi; Beat Thürlimann; Maria B Lyng; Henrik J Ditzel; Vernon J Harvey; Patrick Neven; Isabelle Treilleux; Birgitte Bruun Rasmussen; Rudolf Maibach; Karen N Price; Alan S Coates; Aron Goldhirsch; Olivia Pagani; Giuseppe Viale; James M Rae; Meredith M Regan Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2015-05-03 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: D L Hertz; K M Kidwell; S G Hilsenbeck; S Oesterreich; C K Osborne; S Philips; C Chenault; R J Hartmaier; T C Skaar; M J Sikora; J M Rae Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2017-07-20 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Matthew P Goetz; James X Sun; Vera J Suman; Grace O Silva; Charles M Perou; Yusuke Nakamura; Nancy J Cox; Philip J Stephens; Vincent A Miller; Jeffrey S Ross; David Chen; Stephanie L Safgren; Mary J Kuffel; Matthew M Ames; Krishna R Kalari; Henry L Gomez; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Octavio Burgues; Hiltrud B Brauch; James N Ingle; Mark J Ratain; Roman Yelensky Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2014-12-08 Impact factor: 13.506