Literature DB >> 28707056

Comparison of Oncotype DX® Recurrence Score® with other risk assessment tools including the Nottingham Prognostic Index in the identification of patients with low-risk invasive breast cancer.

Maura Bríd Cotter1,2, Alex Dakin1,3, Aoife Maguire1,2, Janice M Walshe4, M John Kennedy5, Barbara Dunne2, Ciarán Ó Riain2, Cecily M Quinn6,7.   

Abstract

Oncotype DX® is a gene expression assay that quantifies the risk of distant recurrence in patients with hormone receptor positive early breast cancer, publicly funded in Ireland since 2011. The aim of this study was to correlate Oncotype DX® risk groupings with traditional histopathological parameters and the results of other risk assessment tools including Recurrence Score-Pathology-Clinical (RSPC), Adjuvant Risk Index (Adj RI), Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) and the Adjuvant! Online 10-year score (AO). Patients were retrospectively identified from the histopathology databases of two Irish hospitals and patient and tumour characteristics collated. Associations between categorical variables were evaluated with Pearson's chi-square test. Correlations were calculated using Spearman's correlation coefficient and concordance using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software, version 22.0.In our 300 patient cohort, Oncotype DX® classified 59.7% (n = 179) as low, 30% (n = 90) as intermediate, and 10.3% (n = 31) as high risk. Overall concordance between the RS and RSPC, Adj RI, NPI, and AO was 67.3% (n = 202), 56.3% (n = 169), 59% (n = 177), and 36.3% (n = 109), respectively. All risk assessment tools classified the majority of patients as low risk apart from the AO 10-year score, with RSPC classifying the highest number of patients as low risk. This study demonstrates that there is good correlation between the RS and scores obtained using alternative risk tools. Concordance with NPI is strong, particularly in the low-risk group. NPI, calculated from traditional clinicopathological characteristics, is a reliable alternative to Oncotype DX® in the identification of low-risk patients who may avoid adjuvant chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adjuvant chemotherapy; Hormone receptor positive invasive breast carcinoma; Nottingham Prognostic Index; Oncotype DX® Recurrence Score®; Risk assessment tools

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28707056     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-017-2184-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  38 in total

1.  The Nottingham Prognostic Index in primary breast cancer.

Authors:  M H Galea; R W Blamey; C E Elston; I O Ellis
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Comparison of the prognostic and predictive utilities of the 21-gene Recurrence Score assay and Adjuvant! for women with node-negative, ER-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-14 and NSABP B-20.

Authors:  Gong Tang; Steven Shak; Soonmyung Paik; Stewart J Anderson; Joseph P Costantino; Charles E Geyer; Eleftherios P Mamounas; D Lawrence Wickerham; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Impact of Oncotype DX testing on adjuvant treatment decisions in patients with early breast cancer: a single-center study in the United Arab Emirates.

Authors:  Hassan Jaafar; Mohamed Al Bashir; Ali Taher; Khaled Qawasmeh; Mohammed Jaloudi
Journal:  Asia Pac J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 2.601

4.  Comment on the Nottingham Prognostic Index.

Authors:  J Brown; M Jones; E A Benson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours.

Authors:  C M Perou; T Sørlie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; C A Rees; J R Pollack; D T Ross; H Johnsen; L A Akslen; O Fluge; A Pergamenschikov; C Williams; S X Zhu; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale; P O Brown; D Botstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-17       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Histopathologic variables predict Oncotype DX recurrence score.

Authors:  Melina B Flanagan; David J Dabbs; Adam M Brufsky; Sushil Beriwal; Rohit Bhargava
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 7.842

7.  Prospective multicenter study of the impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay on medical oncologist and patient adjuvant breast cancer treatment selection.

Authors:  Shelly S Lo; Patricia B Mumby; John Norton; Karen Rychlik; Jeffrey Smerage; Joseph Kash; Helen K Chew; Ellen R Gaynor; Daniel F Hayes; Andrew Epstein; Kathy S Albain
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  The Nottingham Prognostic Index applied to 9,149 patients from the studies of the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG).

Authors:  I Balslev; C K Axelsson; K Zedeler; B B Rasmussen; B Carstensen; H T Mouridsen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Prediction of risk of distant recurrence using the 21-gene recurrence score in node-negative and node-positive postmenopausal patients with breast cancer treated with anastrozole or tamoxifen: a TransATAC study.

Authors:  Mitch Dowsett; Jack Cuzick; Christopher Wale; John Forbes; Elizabeth A Mallon; Janine Salter; Emma Quinn; Anita Dunbier; Michael Baum; Aman Buzdar; Anthony Howell; Roberto Bugarini; Frederick L Baehner; Steven Shak
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Oncotype DX breast cancer recurrence score can be predicted with a novel nomogram using clinicopathologic data.

Authors:  Amila Orucevic; John L Bell; Alison P McNabb; Robert E Heidel
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.