Literature DB >> 28561071

Clinical utility of gene-expression signatures in early stage breast cancer.

Maryann Kwa1, Andreas Makris2, Francisco J Esteva1.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease, with different subtypes having a distinct biological, molecular, and clinical course. Assessments of standard clinical and pathological features have traditionally been used to determine the use of adjuvant systemic therapy in patients with early stage breast cancer; however, the ability to identify those who will benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy remains a challenge, leading to the overtreatment of some patients. Advances in molecular medicine have substantially improved the accuracy of gene-expression profiling of breast tumours, resulting in improvements in the ability to predict a patient's risk of breast cancer recurrence and likely response to endocrine therapy and/or chemotherapy. These genomic assays, several of which are commercially available, have aided physicians in tailoring treatment decisions for patients at the individual level. Herein, we describe the available data on the clinical validity of the most widely available assays in patients with early stage breast cancer, with a focus on the development, validation, and clinical application of these assays, in addition to the anticipated outcomes of ongoing prospective trials. We also review data from comparative studies of these assays and from cost-effectiveness analyses relating to their clinical use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28561071     DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.74

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1759-4774            Impact factor:   66.675


  103 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of the 70-gene signature versus St. Gallen guidelines and Adjuvant Online for early breast cancer.

Authors:  Valesca P Retèl; Manuela A Joore; Michael Knauer; Sabine C Linn; Michael Hauptmann; Wim H van Harten
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  Utility of prognostic genomic tests in breast cancer practice: The IMPAKT 2012 Working Group Consensus Statement.

Authors:  H A Azim; S Michiels; F Zagouri; S Delaloge; M Filipits; M Namer; P Neven; W F Symmans; A Thompson; F André; S Loi; C Swanton
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 3.  Biological subtypes of breast cancer: Prognostic and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Ozlem Yersal; Sabri Barutca
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-10

4.  Robustness, scalability, and integration of a wound-response gene expression signature in predicting breast cancer survival.

Authors:  Howard Y Chang; Dimitry S A Nuyten; Julie B Sneddon; Trevor Hastie; Robert Tibshirani; Therese Sørlie; Hongyue Dai; Yudong D He; Laura J van't Veer; Harry Bartelink; Matt van de Rijn; Patrick O Brown; Marc J van de Vijver
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Analysis of the MammaPrint breast cancer assay in a predominantly postmenopausal cohort.

Authors:  Ben S Wittner; Dennis C Sgroi; Paula D Ryan; Tako J Bruinsma; Annuska M Glas; Anitha Male; Sonika Dahiya; Karleen Habin; Rene Bernards; Daniel A Haber; Laura J Van't Veer; Sridhar Ramaswamy
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Gene expression profiles from formalin fixed paraffin embedded breast cancer tissue are largely comparable to fresh frozen matched tissue.

Authors:  Lorenza Mittempergher; Jorma J de Ronde; Marja Nieuwland; Ron M Kerkhoven; Iris Simon; Emiel J Th Rutgers; Lodewyk F A Wessels; Laura J Van't Veer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100,000 women in 123 randomised trials.

Authors:  R Peto; C Davies; J Godwin; R Gray; H C Pan; M Clarke; D Cutter; S Darby; P McGale; C Taylor; Y C Wang; J Bergh; A Di Leo; K Albain; S Swain; M Piccart; K Pritchard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Comparing Breast Cancer Multiparameter Tests in the OPTIMA Prelim Trial: No Test Is More Equal Than the Others.

Authors:  John M S Bartlett; Jane Bayani; Andrea Marshall; Janet A Dunn; Amy Campbell; Carrie Cunningham; Monika S Sobol; Peter S Hall; Christopher J Poole; David A Cameron; Helena M Earl; Daniel W Rea; Iain R Macpherson; Peter Canney; Adele Francis; Christopher McCabe; Sarah E Pinder; Luke Hughes-Davies; Andreas Makris; Robert C Stein
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Gene expression signature of fibroblast serum response predicts human cancer progression: similarities between tumors and wounds.

Authors:  Howard Y Chang; Julie B Sneddon; Ash A Alizadeh; Ruchira Sood; Rob B West; Kelli Montgomery; Jen-Tsan Chi; Matt van de Rijn; David Botstein; Patrick O Brown
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2004-01-13       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Clinical validation of the EndoPredict test in node-positive, chemotherapy-treated ER+/HER2- breast cancer patients: results from the GEICAM 9906 trial.

Authors:  Miguel Martin; Jan C Brase; Lourdes Calvo; Kristin Krappmann; Manuel Ruiz-Borrego; Karin Fisch; Amparo Ruiz; Karsten E Weber; Blanca Munarriz; Christoph Petry; Cesar A Rodriguez; Ralf Kronenwett; Carmen Crespo; Emilio Alba; Eva Carrasco; Maribel Casas; Rosalia Caballero; Alvaro Rodriguez-Lescure
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  71 in total

1.  Aneuploidy, TP53 mutation, and amplification of MYC correlate with increased intratumor heterogeneity and poor prognosis of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Johanna Oltmann; Kerstin Heselmeyer-Haddad; Leanora S Hernandez; Rüdiger Meyer; Irianna Torres; Yue Hu; Natalie Doberstein; J Keith Killian; David Petersen; Yuelin Jack Zhu; Daniel C Edelman; Paul S Meltzer; Russell Schwartz; E Michael Gertz; Alejandro A Schäffer; Gert Auer; Jens K Habermann; Thomas Ried
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 5.006

2.  Neoadjuvant Management of Early Breast Cancer: A Clinical and Investigational Position Statement.

Authors:  Ramon Colomer; Cristina Saura; Pedro Sánchez-Rovira; Tomás Pascual; Isabel T Rubio; Octavio Burgués; Lourdes Marcos; César A Rodríguez; Miguel Martín; Ana Lluch
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-02-01

3.  Prognostic impact of interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein on patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Tatsuo Shimura; Masahiko Shibata; Kenji Gonda; Yuko Murakami; Masaru Noda; Kazunoshin Tachibana; Noriko Abe; Tohru Ohtake
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 4.  Current Status of Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Early Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Tomás Reinert; Rodrigo Gonçalves; Matthew J Ellis
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2018-04-16

5.  GSIAR: gene-subcategory interaction-based improved deep representation learning for breast cancer subcategorical analysis using gene expression, applicable for precision medicine.

Authors:  Chiranjib Sur
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Racial and ethnic disparities in 21-gene recurrence scores, chemotherapy, and survival among women with hormone receptor-positive, node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Yunan Han; Zhi-Feng Miao; Min Lian; Lindsay L Peterson; Graham A Colditz; Ying Liu
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Adjuvant Chemotherapy Guided by a 21-Gene Expression Assay in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Joseph A Sparano; Robert J Gray; Della F Makower; Kathleen I Pritchard; Kathy S Albain; Daniel F Hayes; Charles E Geyer; Elizabeth C Dees; Matthew P Goetz; John A Olson; Tracy Lively; Sunil S Badve; Thomas J Saphner; Lynne I Wagner; Timothy J Whelan; Matthew J Ellis; Soonmyung Paik; William C Wood; Peter M Ravdin; Maccon M Keane; Henry L Gomez Moreno; Pavan S Reddy; Timothy F Goggins; Ingrid A Mayer; Adam M Brufsky; Deborah L Toppmeyer; Virginia G Kaklamani; Jeffrey L Berenberg; Jeffrey Abrams; George W Sledge
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-06-03       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Breast Cancer: A Molecularly Heterogenous Disease Needing Subtype-Specific Treatments.

Authors:  Ugo Testa; Germana Castelli; Elvira Pelosi
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-23

9.  Metastatic Conditioning of Myeloid Cells at a Subcutaneous Synthetic Niche Reflects Disease Progression and Predicts Therapeutic Outcomes.

Authors:  Robert S Oakes; Grace G Bushnell; Sophia M Orbach; Pridvi Kandagatla; Yining Zhang; Aaron H Morris; Matthew S Hall; Petrina LaFaire; Joseph T Decker; Rachel M Hartfield; Michael D Brooks; Max S Wicha; Jacqueline S Jeruss; Lonnie D Shea
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Exerts Selection Pressure Towards Luminal Phenotype Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Giulia Galli; Giacomo Bregni; Stefano Cavalieri; Luca Porcu; Paolo Baili; Amash Hade; Francesca Di Salvo; Milena Sant; Roberto Agresti; Massimiliano Gennaro; Secondo Folli; Maria C De Santis; Biagio Paolini; Maria L Carcangiu; Filippo de Braud; Serena Di Cosimo
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.