Literature DB >> 26848284

Metrics for Success: Strategies for Enabling Core Facility Performance and Assessing Outcomes.

Paula B Turpen1, Philip E Hockberger1, Susan M Meyn1, Connie Nicklin1, Diane Tabarini1, Julie A Auger1.   

Abstract

Core Facilities are key elements in the research portfolio of academic and private research institutions. Administrators overseeing core facilities (core administrators) require assessment tools for evaluating the need and effectiveness of these facilities at their institutions. This article discusses ways to promote best practices in core facilities as well as ways to evaluate their performance across 8 of the following categories: general management, research and technical staff, financial management, customer base and satisfaction, resource management, communications, institutional impact, and strategic planning. For each category, we provide lessons learned that we believe contribute to the effective and efficient overall management of core facilities. If done well, we believe that encouraging best practices and evaluating performance in core facilities will demonstrate and reinforce the importance of core facilities in the research and educational mission of institutions. It will also increase job satisfaction of those working in core facilities and improve the likelihood of sustainability of both facilities and personnel.

Keywords:  ABRF; evaluation; standards

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26848284      PMCID: PMC4736753          DOI: 10.7171/jbt.16-2701-001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol Tech        ISSN: 1524-0215


  6 in total

1.  Core facilities: maximizing the return on investment.

Authors:  Gregory K Farber; Linda Weiss
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 17.956

2.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance.

Authors:  R S Kaplan; D P Norton
Journal:  Harv Bus Rev       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb

3.  Best practices for core facilities: handling external customers.

Authors:  Philip Hockberger; Susan Meyn; Connie Nicklin; Diane Tabarini; Paula Turpen; Julie Auger
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2013-07

4.  A generation at risk: young investigators and the future of the biomedical workforce.

Authors:  Ronald J Daniels
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  U.S. National Institutes of Health core consolidation-investing in greater efficiency.

Authors:  Michael C Chang; Steven Birken; Franziska Grieder; James Anderson
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2015-04

6.  Rescuing US biomedical research from its systemic flaws.

Authors:  Bruce Alberts; Marc W Kirschner; Shirley Tilghman; Harold Varmus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 11.205

  6 in total
  11 in total

1.  Building a Sustainable Portfolio of Core Facilities: a Case Study.

Authors:  Philip Hockberger; Jeffrey Weiss; Aaron Rosen; Andrew Ott
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2018-08-06

2.  Building a Quality Management System in a Core Facility: A Genomics Core Case Study.

Authors:  Christopher W Gregory
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2020-07

3.  Evaluating IACUCs: Previous Research and Future Directions.

Authors:  Madeline L Budda; Stacy L Pritt
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 1.232

4.  Best practices for managing large CryoEM facilities.

Authors:  Bart Alewijnse; Alun W Ashton; Melissa G Chambers; Songye Chen; Anchi Cheng; Mark Ebrahim; Edward T Eng; Wim J H Hagen; Abraham J Koster; Claudia S López; Natalya Lukoyanova; Joaquin Ortega; Ludovic Renault; Steve Reyntjens; William J Rice; Giovanna Scapin; Raymond Schrijver; Alistair Siebert; Scott M Stagg; Valerie Grum-Tokars; Elizabeth R Wright; Shenping Wu; Zhiheng Yu; Z Hong Zhou; Bridget Carragher; Clinton S Potter
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 2.867

5.  The Shared Core Resource as a Partner in Innovative Scientific Research: Illustration from an Academic Microscopy Imaging Center.

Authors:  Douglas J Taatjes; Prachi N Ghule; Nicole A Bouffard; Kyra Lee; Nicole M DeLance; Mark F Evans; Donald L Weaver; Nicholas Deakin; Frances E Carr; Brian L Sprague; Gary S Stein; Janet L Stein
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2022-03-24

6.  Providing Experiential Business and Management Training for Biomedical Research Trainees.

Authors:  Kimberly A Petrie; Robert H Carnahan; Abigail M Brown; Kathleen L Gould
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Collaborating by courier, imaging by mail.

Authors:  Rüdiger Schweigreiter; Christopher Cawthorne; Saskia Lippens; Geert Van Minnebruggen; Sebastian Munck
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 8.807

8.  The Access Technology Program of the Indiana Clinical Translational Sciences Institute (CTSI): A model to facilitate access to cutting-edge technologies across a state.

Authors:  Christie M Orschell; Todd C Skaar; Melanie E DeFord; Joel Ybe; Julie Driscol; Christine Drury; Lilith Reeves; Monte S Willis; Jill L Reiter; Jenna York; Rob Orr; Jeanette N McClintick; Thomas G Sors; Joe Hunt; Kenneth Cornetta; Anantha Shekhar
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2020-08-19

9.  Standard Flow Multiplexed Proteomics (SFloMPro)-An Accessible Alternative to NanoFlow Based Shotgun Proteomics.

Authors:  Benjamin C Orsburn; Sierra D Miller; Conor J Jenkins
Journal:  Proteomes       Date:  2022-01-13

Review 10.  Solutions for Shared Resource Lab Remote Quality Control and Instrument Troubleshooting during a Pandemic.

Authors:  David M Gravano; Uttara Chakraborty; Isabella Pesce; Michael Thomson
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 4.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.