Literature DB >> 10119714

The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance.

R S Kaplan1, D P Norton.   

Abstract

Frustrated by the inadequacies of traditional performance measurement systems, some managers have abandoned financial measures like return on equity and earnings per share. "Make operational improvements and the numbers will follow," the argument goes. But managers do not want to choose between financial and operational measures. Executives want a balanced presentation of measures that allow them to view the company from several perspectives simultaneously. During a year-long research project with 12 companies at the leading edge of performance measurement, the authors developed a "balanced scorecard," a new performance measurement system that gives top managers a fast but comprehensive view of the business. The balanced scorecard includes financial measures that tell the results of actions already taken. And it complements those financial measures with three sets of operational measures having to do with customer satisfaction, internal processes, and the organization's ability to learn and improve--the activities that drive future financial performance. Managers can create a balanced scorecard by translating their company's strategy and mission statements into specific goals and measures. To create the part of the scorecard that focuses on the customer perspective, for example, executives at Electronic Circuits Inc. established general goals for customer performance: get standard products to market sooner, improve customers' time-to-market, become customers' supplier of choice through partnerships, and develop innovative products tailored to customer needs. Managers translated these elements of strategy into four specific goals and identified a measure for each.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 10119714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Harv Bus Rev        ISSN: 0017-8012


  93 in total

1.  Accountability in public health units: using a modified nominal group technique to develop a balanced scorecard for performance measurement.

Authors:  Victoria A Robinson; Duncan Hunter; Samuel E D Shortt
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct

2.  The contributions of library and information services to hospitals and academic health sciences centers: a preliminary taxonomy.

Authors:  Eileen G Abels; Keith W Cogdill; Lisl Zach
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2002-07

3.  Identifying and communicating the contributions of library and information services in hospitals and academic health sciences centers.

Authors:  Eileen G Abels; Keith W Cogdill; Lisl Zach
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2004-01

4.  Understanding coordination of care from the consumer's perspective in a regional health system.

Authors:  Alexandra Harrison; Marja Verhoef
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Balanced scorecards: a new tool for family medicine.

Authors:  Richard C Wender; Jeff Susman
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 6.  [The balanced scorecard. "Tool or toy" in hospitals].

Authors:  A Brinkmann; F Gebhard; R Isenmann; U Bothner; U Mohl; B Schwilk
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  Use of Self-Organizing Maps for Balanced Scorecard analysis to monitor the performance of dialysis clinic chains.

Authors:  Isabella Cattinelli; Elena Bolzoni; Carlo Barbieri; Flavio Mari; José David Martin-Guerrero; Emilio Soria-Olivas; José Maria Martinez-Martinez; Juan Gomez-Sanchis; Claudia Amato; Andrea Stopper; Emanuele Gatti
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2011-11-15

8.  A balanced scorecard approach in assessing IT value in healthcare sector: an empirical examination.

Authors:  Ing-Long Wu; Yi-Zu Kuo
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 4.460

9.  Performance evaluation of medical records departments by analytical hierarchy process (AHP) approach in the selected hospitals in Isfahan : medical records dep. & AHP.

Authors:  Sima Ajami; Saeedeh Ketabi
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 4.460

10.  Using hybrid method to evaluate the green performance in uncertainty.

Authors:  Ming-Lang Tseng; Lawrence W Lan; Ray Wang; Anthony Chiu; Hui-Ping Cheng
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 2.513

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.