Literature DB >> 21920337

Physiological basis for angina and ST-segment change PET-verified thresholds of quantitative stress myocardial perfusion and coronary flow reserve.

Nils P Johnson1, K Lance Gould.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the quantitative low-flow threshold for stress-induced perfusion defects with severe angina and/or significant ST-segment depression during dipyridamole hyperemia.
BACKGROUND: Vasodilator stress reveals differences in regional perfusion without ischemia in most patients. However, in patients with a perfusion defect, angina, and/or significant ST-segment depression during dipyridamole stress, quantitative absolute myocardial perfusion and coronary flow reserve (CFR) at the exact moment of definite ischemia have not been established. Defining these low-flow thresholds of angina or ST-segment changes may offer insight into physiological disease severity in patients with atherosclerosis.
METHODS: Patients underwent rest-dipyridamole stress positron emission tomography (PET) with absolute flow quantification in ml/min/g. Definite ischemia was defined as a new or worse perfusion defect during dipyridamole stress with significant ST-segment depression and/or severe angina requiring pharmacological treatment. Indeterminate clinical features required only 1 of these 3 abnormalities. The comparison group included patients without prior myocardial infarction, or angina or electrocardiographic changes after dipyridamole.
RESULTS: In 1,674 sequential PET studies, we identified 194 (12%) with definite ischemia, 840 (50%) studies with no ischemia, and 301 (18%) that were clinically indeterminate. A vasodilator stress perfusion cutoff of 0.91 ml/min/g optimally separated definite from no ischemia with an area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.98 and a CFR cutoff of 1.74 with an AUC = 0.91, reflecting excellent discrimination at the exact moment of definite ischemia.
CONCLUSIONS: Thresholds of low myocardial vasodilator stress perfusion in ml/min/g and CFR sharply separate patients with angina or ST-segment change from those without these manifestations of ischemia during dipyridamole stress with excellent discrimination. Stress flow below 0.91 ml/min/g in dipyridamole-induced PET perfusion defects causes significant ST-segment depression and/or severe angina. However, when the worst vasodilator stress flow exceeds 1.12 ml/min/g, these manifestations of ischemia occur rarely.
Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21920337     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.06.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1876-7591


  41 in total

Review 1.  PET: Is myocardial flow quantification a clinical reality?

Authors:  Antti Saraste; Sami Kajander; Chunlei Han; Sergey V Nesterov; Juhani Knuuti
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Quantitative Coronary Physiology for Clinical Management: the Imaging Standard.

Authors:  K Lance Gould; Nils P Johnson
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Clinical use of quantitative cardiac perfusion PET: rationale, modalities and possible indications. Position paper of the Cardiovascular Committee of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM).

Authors:  Roberto Sciagrà; Alessandro Passeri; Jan Bucerius; Hein J Verberne; Riemer H J A Slart; Oliver Lindner; Alessia Gimelli; Fabien Hyafil; Denis Agostini; Christopher Übleis; Marcus Hacker
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Simplified quantification of PET myocardial blood flow: The need for technical standardization.

Authors:  Jonathan B Moody; Edward P Ficaro; Venkatesh L Murthy
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Abnormal glucose and lipid control in non-ischemic left ventricular dysfunction.

Authors:  Danilo Neglia; Tiziana Sampietro; Cecilia Vecoli; Riccardo Liga; Giuseppe Rossi; Elena Filidei; Federico Bigazzi; Patricia Iozzo; Daniela Giannessi; Antonio L'Abbate; Daniele Rovai
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  Serious and potentially life threatening complications of cardiac stress testing: Physiological mechanisms and management strategies.

Authors:  Vasken Dilsizian; Henry Gewirtz; Nicholas Paivanas; Anastasia N Kitsiou; Fadi G Hage; Nathan E Crone; Ronald G Schwartz
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 7.  Precision and accuracy of clinical quantification of myocardial blood flow by dynamic PET: A technical perspective.

Authors:  Jonathan B Moody; Benjamin C Lee; James R Corbett; Edward P Ficaro; Venkatesh L Murthy
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 8.  Proceedings of the Cardiac PET Summit, 12 May 2014, Baltimore, MD : 3: Quantitation of myocardial blood flow.

Authors:  Timothy M Bateman; K Lance Gould; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 9.  Value of FFR in clinical practice.

Authors:  Anil Mehra; Bishav Mohan
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2015-03-14

Review 10.  Quantification of PET Myocardial Blood Flow.

Authors:  Matthieu Pelletier-Galarneau; Patrick Martineau; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.