Helga Castagnoli1, Cecilia Ferrantini2, Raffaele Coppini2, Alessandro Passeri1, Katia Baldini2, Valentina Berti1, Franco Cecchi2, Iacopo Olivotto2, Roberto Sciagrà3. 1. Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences - Nuclear Medicine Unit, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Firenze, Italy. 2. Referral Center for Myocardial Diseases and Genetic Diagnostics Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy. 3. Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences - Nuclear Medicine Unit, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Firenze, Italy. roberto.sciagra@unifi.it.
Abstract
AIMS: Myocardial blood flow <1.1 mL/min/g following dipyridamole (Dip-MBF) assessed by positron emission tomography (PET) was identified in 2003 as an important outcome predictor in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), based on scans performed in the 90s. However, such extreme Dip-MBF impairment is rarely observed in contemporary cohorts. We, therefore, reassessed the Dip-MBF threshold defining high-risk HCM patients. METHODS: Dip-MBF was measured using 13N-ammonia in 100 HCM consecutive patients, prospectively enrolled and followed for 4.0 ± 2.2 years. Outcome was assessed based on tertiles of Dip-MBF. The study end-point was a combination of cardiovascular death, progression to severe functional limitation, cardioembolic stroke, life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. RESULTS: Global Dip-MBF was 1.95 ± 0.85, ranging from 0.7 to 5.9 mL/min/g. Dip-MBF tertile cut-off values were: 0.73 to 1.53 mL/min/g (lowest), 1.54 to 2.13 mL/min/g (middle), and 2.14 to 5.89 mL/min/g (highest). During follow-up, lowest tertile Dip-MBF was associated with sevenfold independent risk of unfavorable outcome compared to the other two tertiles. Dip-MBF 1.35 mL/min/g was identified as the best threshold for outcome prediction. Regional perfusion analysis showed that all cardiac deaths (n = 4) occurred in patients in the lowest tertile of lateral wall Dip-MBF (≤1.72 mL/min/g); septal Dip-MBF was not predictive. CONCLUSIONS: Dip-MBF confirms its role as potent predictor of outcome in HCM. However, the threshold for prediction in a contemporary cohort is higher than that reported in earlier studies. Dip-MBF impairment in the lateral wall, possibly reflecting diffuse disease extending to non-hypertrophic regions, is a sensitive predictor of mortality in HCM.
AIMS: Myocardial blood flow <1.1 mL/min/g following dipyridamole (Dip-MBF) assessed by positron emission tomography (PET) was identified in 2003 as an important outcome predictor in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), based on scans performed in the 90s. However, such extreme Dip-MBF impairment is rarely observed in contemporary cohorts. We, therefore, reassessed the Dip-MBF threshold defining high-risk HCM patients. METHODS: Dip-MBF was measured using 13N-ammonia in 100 HCM consecutive patients, prospectively enrolled and followed for 4.0 ± 2.2 years. Outcome was assessed based on tertiles of Dip-MBF. The study end-point was a combination of cardiovascular death, progression to severe functional limitation, cardioembolic stroke, life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. RESULTS: Global Dip-MBF was 1.95 ± 0.85, ranging from 0.7 to 5.9 mL/min/g. Dip-MBF tertile cut-off values were: 0.73 to 1.53 mL/min/g (lowest), 1.54 to 2.13 mL/min/g (middle), and 2.14 to 5.89 mL/min/g (highest). During follow-up, lowest tertile Dip-MBF was associated with sevenfold independent risk of unfavorable outcome compared to the other two tertiles. Dip-MBF 1.35 mL/min/g was identified as the best threshold for outcome prediction. Regional perfusion analysis showed that all cardiac deaths (n = 4) occurred in patients in the lowest tertile of lateral wall Dip-MBF (≤1.72 mL/min/g); septal Dip-MBF was not predictive. CONCLUSIONS: Dip-MBF confirms its role as potent predictor of outcome in HCM. However, the threshold for prediction in a contemporary cohort is higher than that reported in earlier studies. Dip-MBF impairment in the lateral wall, possibly reflecting diffuse disease extending to non-hypertrophic regions, is a sensitive predictor of mortality in HCM.
Authors: Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-01-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Bernard J Gersh; Barry J Maron; Robert O Bonow; Joseph A Dearani; Michael A Fifer; Mark S Link; Srihari S Naidu; Rick A Nishimura; Steve R Ommen; Harry Rakowski; Christine E Seidman; Jeffrey A Towbin; James E Udelson; Clyde W Yancy Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-11-08 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: T R DeGrado; M W Hanson; T G Turkington; D M Delong; D A Brezinski; J P Vallée; L W Hedlund; J Zhang; F Cobb; M J Sullivan; R E Coleman Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 1996 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Piotr J Slomka; Erick Alexanderson; Rodrigo Jácome; Moises Jiménez; Edgar Romero; Aloha Meave; Ludovic Le Meunier; Magnus Dalhbom; Daniel S Berman; Guido Germano; Heinrich Schelbert Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2012-01-06 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Dai-Yin Lu; Hulya Yalçin; Fatih Yalçin; Min Zhao; Sanjay Sivalokanathan; Ines Valenta; Abdel Tahari; Martin G Pomper; Theodore P Abraham; Thomas H Schindler; M Roselle Abraham Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2018-02-06 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Claudia Camaioni; Kristopher D Knott; Joao B Augusto; Andreas Seraphim; Stefania Rosmini; Fabrizio Ricci; Redha Boubertakh; Hui Xue; Rebecca Hughes; Gaby Captur; Luis Rocha Lopes; Louise Anne Elizabeth Brown; Charlotte Manisty; Steffen Erhard Petersen; Sven Plein; Peter Kellman; Saidi A Mohiddin; James C Moon Journal: Heart Date: 2019-12-10 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Peter Magnusson; Jonny Nordström; Hendrik J Harms; Mark Lubberink; Fredrik Gadler; Jens Sörensen; Stellan Mörner Journal: Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Date: 2019-12-20