Literature DB >> 26840735

Cell Fate Specification Based on Tristability in the Inner Cell Mass of Mouse Blastocysts.

Laurane De Mot1, Didier Gonze1, Sylvain Bessonnard2, Claire Chazaud2, Albert Goldbeter3, Geneviève Dupont4.   

Abstract

During development, interactions between transcription factors control the specification of different cell fates. The regulatory networks of genetic interactions often exhibit multiple stable steady states; such multistability provides a common dynamical basis for differentiation. During early murine embryogenesis, cells from the inner cell mass (ICM) can be specified in epiblast (Epi) or primitive endoderm (PrE). Besides the intracellular gene regulatory network, specification is also controlled by intercellular interactions involving Erk signaling through extracellular Fgf4. We previously proposed a model that describes the gene regulatory network and its interaction with Erk signaling in ICM cells. The model displays tristability in a range of Fgf4 concentrations and accounts for the self-organized specification process observed in vivo. Here, we further investigate the origin of tristability in the model and analyze in more detail the specification process by resorting to a simplified two-cell model. We also carry out simulations of a population of 25 cells under various experimental conditions to compare their outcome with that of mutant embryos or of embryos submitted to exogenous treatments that interfere with Fgf signaling. The results are analyzed by means of bifurcation diagrams. Finally, the model predicts that heterogeneities in extracellular Fgf4 concentration play a primary role in the spatial arrangement of the Epi/PrE cells in a salt-and-pepper pattern. If, instead of heterogeneities in extracellular Fgf4 concentration, internal fluctuations in the levels of expression of the transcription factors are considered as a source of randomness, simulations predict the occurrence of unrealistic switches between the Epi and the PrE cell fates, as well as the evolution of some cells toward one of these states without passing through the previous ICM state, in contrast to what is observed in vivo.
Copyright © 2016 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26840735      PMCID: PMC4744165          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.12.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  53 in total

1.  Primitive endoderm differentiates via a three-step mechanism involving Nanog and RTK signaling.

Authors:  Stephen Frankenberg; François Gerbe; Sylvain Bessonnard; Corinne Belville; Pierre Pouchin; Olivier Bardot; Claire Chazaud
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 12.270

2.  Different cell fates from cell-cell interactions: core architectures of two-cell bistable networks.

Authors:  Hervé Rouault; Vincent Hakim
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Sequence-specific regulator Prdm14 safeguards mouse ESCs from entering extraembryonic endoderm fates.

Authors:  Ziyang Ma; Tomek Swigut; Anton Valouev; Alvaro Rada-Iglesias; Joanna Wysocka
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 15.369

4.  Core transcriptional regulatory circuitry in human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Laurie A Boyer; Tong Ihn Lee; Megan F Cole; Sarah E Johnstone; Stuart S Levine; Jacob P Zucker; Matthew G Guenther; Roshan M Kumar; Heather L Murray; Richard G Jenner; David K Gifford; Douglas A Melton; Rudolf Jaenisch; Richard A Young
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-09-23       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Tristability in cancer-associated microRNA-TF chimera toggle switch.

Authors:  Mingyang Lu; Mohit Kumar Jolly; Ryan Gomoto; Bin Huang; José Onuchic; Eshel Ben-Jacob
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  The Grb2/Mek pathway represses Nanog in murine embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Takashi Hamazaki; Sarah M Kehoe; Toru Nakano; Naohiro Terada
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Suppression of Erk signalling promotes ground state pluripotency in the mouse embryo.

Authors:  Jennifer Nichols; Jose Silva; Mila Roode; Austin Smith
Journal:  Development       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 6.868

8.  Stochastic NANOG fluctuations allow mouse embryonic stem cells to explore pluripotency.

Authors:  Elsa Abranches; Ana M V Guedes; Martin Moravec; Hedia Maamar; Petr Svoboda; Arjun Raj; Domingos Henrique
Journal:  Development       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 6.868

9.  FGF4 is required for lineage restriction and salt-and-pepper distribution of primitive endoderm factors but not their initial expression in the mouse.

Authors:  Minjung Kang; Anna Piliszek; Jérôme Artus; Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis
Journal:  Development       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  An improved single-cell cDNA amplification method for efficient high-density oligonucleotide microarray analysis.

Authors:  Kazuki Kurimoto; Yukihiro Yabuta; Yasuhide Ohinata; Yukiko Ono; Kenichiro D Uno; Rikuhiro G Yamada; Hiroki R Ueda; Mitinori Saitou
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Dissipative structures in biological systems: bistability, oscillations, spatial patterns and waves.

Authors:  Albert Goldbeter
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Transition states and cell fate decisions in epigenetic landscapes.

Authors:  Naomi Moris; Cristina Pina; Alfonso Martinez Arias
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Coordination between patterning and morphogenesis ensures robustness during mouse development.

Authors:  Néstor Saiz; Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Network Features and Dynamical Landscape of Naive and Primed Pluripotency.

Authors:  Benjamin Pfeuty; Clémence Kress; Bertrand Pain
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 5.  Making lineage decisions with biological noise: Lessons from the early mouse embryo.

Authors:  Claire S Simon; Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis; Christian Schröter
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 5.814

6.  Initial source of heterogeneity in a model for cell fate decision in the early mammalian embryo.

Authors:  Corentin Robert; Francisco Prista von Bonhorst; Yannick De Decker; Geneviève Dupont; Didier Gonze
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.661

7.  Geometry of gene regulatory dynamics.

Authors:  David A Rand; Archishman Raju; Meritxell Sáez; Francis Corson; Eric D Siggia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 12.779

8.  NANOG initiates epiblast fate through the coordination of pluripotency genes expression.

Authors:  Nicolas Allègre; Sabine Chauveau; Cynthia Dennis; Yoan Renaud; Dimitri Meistermann; Lorena Valverde Estrella; Pierre Pouchin; Michel Cohen-Tannoudji; Laurent David; Claire Chazaud
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 17.694

9.  Live Visualization of ERK Activity in the Mouse Blastocyst Reveals Lineage-Specific Signaling Dynamics.

Authors:  Claire S Simon; Shahadat Rahman; Dhruv Raina; Christian Schröter; Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 12.270

10.  A Multistate Toggle Switch Defines Fungal Cell Fates and Is Regulated by Synergistic Genetic Cues.

Authors:  Matthew Z Anderson; Allison M Porman; Na Wang; Eugenio Mancera; Denis Huang; Christina A Cuomo; Richard J Bennett
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.