Literature DB >> 19710168

Suppression of Erk signalling promotes ground state pluripotency in the mouse embryo.

Jennifer Nichols1, Jose Silva, Mila Roode, Austin Smith.   

Abstract

Embryonic stem (ES) cells can be derived and propagated from multiple strains of mouse and rat through application of small-molecule inhibitors of the fibroblast growth factor (FGF)/Erk pathway and of glycogen synthase kinase 3. These conditions shield pluripotent cells from differentiation-inducing stimuli. We investigate the effect of these inhibitors on the development of pluripotent epiblast in intact pre-implantation embryos. We find that blockade of Erk signalling from the 8-cell stage does not impede blastocyst formation but suppresses development of the hypoblast. The size of the inner cell mass (ICM) compartment is not reduced, however. Throughout the ICM, the epiblast-specific marker Nanog is expressed, and in XX embryos epigenetic silencing of the paternal X chromosome is erased. Epiblast identity and pluripotency were confirmed by contribution to chimaeras with germline transmission. These observations indicate that segregation of hypoblast from the bipotent ICM is dependent on FGF/Erk signalling and that in the absence of this signal, the entire ICM can acquire pluripotency. Furthermore, the epiblast does not require paracrine support from the hypoblast. Thus, naïve epiblast and ES cells are in a similar ground state, with an autonomous capacity for survival and replication, and high vulnerability to Erk signalling. We probed directly the relationship between naïve epiblast and ES cells. Dissociated ICM cells from freshly harvested late blastocysts gave rise to up to 12 ES cell clones per embryo when plated in the presence of inhibitors. We propose that ES cells are not a tissue culture creation, but are essentially identical to pre-implantation epiblast cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19710168      PMCID: PMC2739140          DOI: 10.1242/dev.038893

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  57 in total

1.  Epigenetic dynamics of imprinted X inactivation during early mouse development.

Authors:  Ikuhiro Okamoto; Arie P Otte; C David Allis; Danny Reinberg; Edith Heard
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-12-11       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Reactivation of the paternal X chromosome in early mouse embryos.

Authors:  Winifred Mak; Tatyana B Nesterova; Mariana de Napoles; Ruth Appanah; Shinya Yamanaka; Arie P Otte; Neil Brockdorff
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-01-30       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Determining the stage of the estrous cycle in the mouse by the appearance of the vagina.

Authors:  A K Champlin; D L Dorr; A H Gates
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 4.285

4.  Immunosurgery of mouse blastocyst.

Authors:  D Solter; B B Knowles
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Formation of germ-line chimaeras from embryo-derived teratocarcinoma cell lines.

Authors:  A Bradley; M Evans; M H Kaufman; E Robertson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1984 May 17-23       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos.

Authors:  M J Evans; M H Kaufman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1981-07-09       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Preservation of hamster oocytes to assay the fertilizing capacity of human spermatozoa.

Authors:  P Quinn; C Barros; D G Whittingham
Journal:  J Reprod Fertil       Date:  1982-09

8.  Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells.

Authors:  G R Martin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Myeloid leukaemia inhibitory factor maintains the developmental potential of embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  R L Williams; D J Hilton; S Pease; T A Willson; C L Stewart; D P Gearing; E F Wagner; D Metcalf; N A Nicola; N M Gough
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-12-15       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Regeneration of endoderm from primitive ectoderm in the mouse embryo: fact or artifact?

Authors:  R L Gardner
Journal:  J Embryol Exp Morphol       Date:  1985-08
View more
  246 in total

1.  Ectopic expression of GATA6 bypasses requirement for Grb2 in primitive endoderm formation.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Jennifer L Smedberg; Kathy Qi Cai; D Callinice Capo-Chichi; Xiang-Xi Xu
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 3.780

Review 2.  Extrinsic regulation of pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Martin F Pera; Patrick P L Tam
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Transcriptional analysis of pluripotency reveals the Hippo pathway as a barrier to reprogramming.

Authors:  Han Qin; Kathryn Blaschke; Grace Wei; Yuki Ohi; Laure Blouin; Zhongxia Qi; Jingwei Yu; Ru-Fang Yeh; Matthias Hebrok; Miguel Ramalho-Santos
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 6.150

4.  Stemness as a cell default state.

Authors:  Jordi Casanova
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 5.  Delineating nuclear reprogramming.

Authors:  Jolene Ooi; Pentao Liu
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 14.870

6.  Engineering artificial signaling centers to polarize embryoid body differentiation.

Authors:  Dorthe R Petersen; Carsten Gustavsen; Søren R Lindskog; Mark A Magnuson; Kenneth S Zaret; Palle Serup
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.272

7.  Effect of small molecule supplements during in vitro culture of mouse zygotes and parthenogenetic embryos on hypoblast formation and stem cell derivation.

Authors:  K Versieren; M Van der Jeught; T O'Leary; G Duggal; J Gerris; S Chuva de Sousa Lopes; B Heindryckx; P De Sutter
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 8.  Learning the molecular mechanisms of the reprogramming factors: let's start from microRNAs.

Authors:  Chao-Shun Yang; Tariq M Rana
Journal:  Mol Biosyst       Date:  2012-10-05

Review 9.  Concise Review: Lessons from Naïve Human Pluripotent Cells.

Authors:  Carol B Ware
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 6.277

Review 10.  Signaling networks in human pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Stephen Dalton
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 8.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.