Literature DB >> 26839906

Characterization of simulated incident scatter and the impact on quantification in dedicated breast single-photon emission computed tomography.

Steve D Mann1, Martin P Tornai2.   

Abstract

The objective was to characterize the changes seen from incident Monte Carlo-based scatter distributions in dedicated three-dimensional (3-D) breast single-photon emission computed tomography, with emphasis on the impact of scatter correction using the dual-energy window (DEW) method. Changes in scatter distributions with 3-D detector position were investigated for prone breast imaging with an ideal detector. Energy spectra within a high-energy scatter window measured from simulations were linearly fit, and the slope was used to characterize scatter distributions. The impact of detector position on the measured scatter fraction within various photopeak windows and the [Formula: see text] value (ratio of scatter within the photopeak and scatter energy windows) useful for scatter correction was determined. Results indicate that application of a single [Formula: see text] value with the DEW method in the presence of anisotropic object scatter distribution is not appropriate for trajectories including the heart and liver. The scatter spectra's slope demonstrates a strong correlation to measured [Formula: see text] values. Reconstructions of fixed-tilt 3-D acquisition trajectories with a single [Formula: see text] value show quantification errors up to 5% compared to primary-only reconstructions. However, a variable-tilt trajectory provides improved sampling and minimizes quantification errors, and thus allows for a single [Formula: see text] value to be used with the DEW method leading to more accurate quantification.

Keywords:  Monte Carlo; dual-energy window; molecular breast imaging; scatter; single-photon emission computed tomography

Year:  2015        PMID: 26839906      PMCID: PMC4729114          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.2.3.033504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  16 in total

1.  18F-FDG PET and 99mTc-sestamibi scintimammography for monitoring breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a comparative study.

Authors:  R Tiling; R Linke; M Untch; A Richter; S Fieber; K Brinkbäumer; K Tatsch; K Hahn
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  2001-06

2.  A dual-photopeak window method for scatter correction.

Authors:  M A King; G J Hademenos; S J Glick
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 3.  Review and current status of SPECT scatter correction.

Authors:  Brian F Hutton; Irène Buvat; Freek J Beekman
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Characterizing the contribution of cardiac and hepatic uptake in dedicated breast SPECT using tilted trajectories.

Authors:  K L Perez; S J Cutler; P Madhav; M P Tornai
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Evaluation of a small cadmium zinc telluride detector for scintimammography.

Authors:  Bryon Mueller; Michael K O'Connor; Ira Blevis; Deborah J Rhodes; Robin Smith; Douglas A Collins; Stephen W Phillips
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Comparative assessment of nine scatter correction methods based on spectral analysis using Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  I Buvat; M Rodriguez-Villafuerte; A Todd-Pokropek; H Benali; R Di Paola
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Improved SPECT quantification using compensation for scattered photons.

Authors:  R J Jaszczak; K L Greer; C E Floyd; C C Harris; R E Coleman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Tc-99m attenuation coefficients in water-filled phantoms determined with gamma cameras.

Authors:  C C Harris; K L Greer; R J Jaszczak; C E Floyd; E C Fearnow; R E Coleman
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1984 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Molecular breast imaging: a new technique using technetium Tc 99m scintimammography to detect small tumors of the breast.

Authors:  Deborah J Rhodes; Michael K O'Connor; Stephen W Phillips; Robin L Smith; Douglas A Collins
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 10.  Molecular breast imaging.

Authors:  Michael O'Connor; Deborah Rhodes; Carrie Hruska
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.512

View more
  1 in total

1.  Crosstalk Reduction Using a Dual Energy Window Scatter Correction in Compton Imaging.

Authors:  Makoto Sakai; Raj Kumar Parajuli; Yoshiki Kubota; Nobuteru Kubo; Mitsutaka Yamaguchi; Yuto Nagao; Naoki Kawachi; Mikiko Kikuchi; Kazuo Arakawa; Mutsumi Tashiro
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-26       Impact factor: 3.576

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.