Literature DB >> 19671027

Molecular breast imaging.

Michael O'Connor1, Deborah Rhodes, Carrie Hruska.   

Abstract

Molecular breast imaging (MBI) is a new nuclear medicine technique that utilizes small semiconductor-based gamma-cameras in a mammographic configuration to provide high-resolution functional images of the breast. Current studies with MBI have used Tc-99m sestamibi, which is an approved agent for breast imaging. The procedure is relatively simple to perform. Imaging can be performed within 5 min postinjection, with the breast lightly compressed between the two detectors. Images of each breast are acquired in the craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique projections facilitating comparison with mammography. Key studies have confirmed that MBI has a high sensitivity for the detection of small breast lesions. In patients with suspected breast cancer, MBI has an overall sensitivity of 90%, with a sensitivity of 82% for lesions less than 10 mm in size. Sensitivity was lowest for tumors less than 5 mm in size. Tumor detection does not appear to be dependent on tumor type, but rather on tumor size. Studies using MBI and breast-specific gamma-imaging have shown that these methods have comparable sensitivity to breast MRI. A large clinical trial compared MBI with screening mammography in over 1000 women with mammographically dense breast tissue and increased risk of breast cancer and showed that MBI detected two-to three-times more cancers than mammography. In addition, MBI appears to have slightly better specificity than mammography in this trial. MBI provides high-resolution functional images of the breast and its potential applications range from evaluation of the extent of disease to a role as an adjunct screening technique in certain high-risk populations. MBI is highly complementary to existing anatomical techniques, such as mammography, tomosynthesis and ultrasound.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19671027      PMCID: PMC2748346          DOI: 10.1586/era.09.75

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther        ISSN: 1473-7140            Impact factor:   4.512


  32 in total

1.  Scintimammography with technetium-99m tetrofosmin in the diagnosis of breast cancer and lymph node metastases.

Authors:  L Mansi; P F Rambaldi; E Procaccini; F D Gregorio; A Laprovitera; B Pecori; W D Vecchio
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1996-08

Review 2.  The role of (99m)Tc methoxyisobutylisonitrile in imaging breast cancer.

Authors:  A D Waxman
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.446

3.  Breast imaging with positron emission tomography and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose: use and limitations.

Authors:  N Avril; C A Rosé; M Schelling; J Dose; W Kuhn; S Bense; W Weber; S Ziegler; H Graeff; M Schwaiger
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  The role of 99mTc-sestamibi and other conventional radiopharmaceuticals in breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  R Taillefer
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.446

5.  Scintimammography with dedicated breast camera detects and localizes occult carcinoma.

Authors:  Leonard R Coover; Gina Caravaglia; Phyllis Kuhn
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Linda L Humphrey; Mark Helfand; Benjamin K S Chan; Steven H Woolf
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-03       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Quantification of lesion size, depth, and uptake using a dual-head molecular breast imaging system.

Authors:  Carrie B Hruska; Michael K O'Connor
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Mammography and subsequent whole-breast sonography of nonpalpable breast cancers: the importance of radiologic breast density.

Authors:  Isabelle Leconte; Chantal Feger; Christine Galant; Martine Berlière; Bruno Vande Berg; William D'Hoore; Baudouin Maldague
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations.

Authors:  Thomas M Kolb; Jacob Lichy; Jeffrey H Newhouse
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Estimating the accuracy of screening mammography: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  A I Mushlin; R W Kouides; D E Shapiro
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.043

View more
  12 in total

1.  Characterization of simulated incident scatter and the impact on quantification in dedicated breast single-photon emission computed tomography.

Authors:  Steve D Mann; Martin P Tornai
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-09-21

2.  Comparison of radiation exposure and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from mammography and molecular imaging of the breast.

Authors:  Michael K O'Connor; Hua Li; Deborah J Rhodes; Carrie B Hruska; Conor B Clancy; Richard J Vetter
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Redefining the sensitivity of screening mammography: A review.

Authors:  Alan B Hollingsworth
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Molecular breast imaging: an emerging modality for breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Michael K O'Connor
Journal:  Breast Cancer Manag       Date:  2015-01-01

5.  Real-time intraoperative detection of breast cancer using near-infrared fluorescence imaging and Methylene Blue.

Authors:  Q R J G Tummers; F P R Verbeek; B E Schaafsma; M C Boonstra; J R van der Vorst; G-J Liefers; C J H van de Velde; J V Frangioni; A L Vahrmeijer
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 4.424

6.  The use of molecular breast imaging to assess response in women undergoing neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer: a pilot study.

Authors:  Dietlind L Wahner-Roedler; Judy C Boughey; Carrie B Hruska; Beiyun Chen; Deborah J Rhodes; Cindy L Tortorelli; Robert W Maxwell; Stephen S Cha; Michael K O'Connor
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 7.794

7.  The Impact of Reduced Injected Radioactivity on Image Quality of Molecular Breast Imaging Tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Olivia Sullivan; Zongyi Gong; Kelly Klanian; Tushita Patel; Mark B Williams
Journal:  Breast Imaging (2012)       Date:  2012-07

8.  Proof of concept for low-dose molecular breast imaging with a dual-head CZT gamma camera. Part I. Evaluation in phantoms.

Authors:  Carrie B Hruska; Amanda L Weinmann; Michael K O'Connor
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 9.  Advances in molecular imaging for breast cancer detection and characterization.

Authors:  Jennifer M Specht; David A Mankoff
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Initial In Vivo Quantification of Tc-99m Sestamibi Uptake as a Function of Tissue Type in Healthy Breasts Using Dedicated Breast SPECT-CT.

Authors:  Steve D Mann; Kristy L Perez; Emily K E McCracken; Jainil P Shah; Terence Z Wong; Martin P Tornai
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 4.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.