Literature DB >> 21701055

Review and current status of SPECT scatter correction.

Brian F Hutton1, Irène Buvat, Freek J Beekman.   

Abstract

Detection of scattered gamma quanta degrades image contrast and quantitative accuracy of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging. This paper reviews methods to characterize and model scatter in SPECT and correct for its image degrading effects, both for clinical and small animal SPECT. Traditionally scatter correction methods were limited in accuracy, noise properties and/or generality and were not very widely applied. For small animal SPECT, these approximate methods of correction are often sufficient since the fraction of detected scattered photons is small. This contrasts with patient imaging where better accuracy can lead to significant improvement of image quality. As a result, over the last two decades, several new and improved scatter correction methods have been developed, although often at the cost of increased complexity and computation time. In concert with (i) the increasing number of energy windows on modern SPECT systems and (ii) excellent attenuation maps provided in SPECT/CT, some of these methods give new opportunities to remove degrading effects of scatter in both standard and complex situations and therefore are a gateway to highly quantitative single- and multi-tracer molecular imaging with improved noise properties. Widespread implementation of such scatter correction methods, however, still requires significant effort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21701055     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/14/R01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  43 in total

1.  Attenuation correction in emission tomography using the emission data--A review.

Authors:  Yannick Berker; Yusheng Li
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Characterization of simulated incident scatter and the impact on quantification in dedicated breast single-photon emission computed tomography.

Authors:  Steve D Mann; Martin P Tornai
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-09-21

3.  Comparison of attenuation, dual-energy-window, and model-based scatter correction of low-count SPECT to 82Rb PET/CT quantified myocardial perfusion scores.

Authors:  R Glenn Wells; Karen Soueidan; Rachel Timmins; Terrence D Ruddy
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Clinical Applications of Technetium-99m Quantitative Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Won Woo Lee
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-03-15

Review 5.  SPECT/CT: an update on technological developments and clinical applications.

Authors:  Michael Ljungberg; P Hendrik Pretorius
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Optimization of a simultaneous dual-isotope 201Tl/123I-MIBG myocardial SPECT imaging protocol with a CZT camera for trigger zone assessment after myocardial infarction for routine clinical settings: Are delayed acquisition and scatter correction necessary?

Authors:  Emmanuel D'estanque; Christophe Hedon; Benoît Lattuca; Aurélie Bourdon; Meriem Benkiran; Aurélie Verd; François Roubille; Denis Mariano-Goulart
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Scatter correction improves concordance in SPECT MPI with a dedicated cardiac SPECT solid-state camera.

Authors:  Amir Pourmoghaddas; Karen Vanderwerf; Terrence D Ruddy; R Glenn Wells
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 8.  Applications of artificial intelligence in nuclear medicine image generation.

Authors:  Zhibiao Cheng; Junhai Wen; Gang Huang; Jianhua Yan
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-06

9.  Fisher information analysis of list-mode SPECT emission data for joint estimation of activity and attenuation distribution.

Authors:  Ashequr Rahman; Yansong Zhu; Eric Clarkson; Matthew A Kupinski; Eric C Frey; Abhinav K Jha
Journal:  Inverse Probl       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 2.407

10.  A detector response function design in pinhole SPECT including geometrical calibration.

Authors:  Z El Bitar; R H Huesman; R Boutchko; Virgile Bekaert; David Brasse; G T Gullberg
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.