Literature DB >> 28679842

The firing characteristics of foot sole cutaneous mechanoreceptor afferents in response to vibration stimuli.

Nicholas D J Strzalkowski1, R Ayesha Ali2, Leah R Bent3.   

Abstract

Single unit microneurography was used to record the firing characteristics of the four classes of foot sole cutaneous afferents [fast and slowly adapting type I and II (FAI, FAII, SAI, and SAII)] in response to sinusoidal vibratory stimuli. Frequency (3-250 Hz) and amplitude (0.001-2 mm) combinations were applied to afferent receptive fields through a 6-mm diameter probe. The impulses per cycle, defined as the number of action potentials evoked per vibration sine wave, were measured over 1 s of vibration at each frequency-amplitude combination tested. Afferent entrainment threshold (lowest amplitude at which an afferent could entrain 1:1 to the vibration frequency) and afferent firing threshold (minimum amplitude for which impulses per cycle was greater than zero) were then obtained for each frequency. Increases in vibration frequency are generally associated with decreases in expected impulses per cycle (P < 0.001), but each foot sole afferent class appears uniquely tuned to vibration stimuli. FAII afferents tended to have the lowest entrainment and firing thresholds (P < 0.001 for both); however, these afferents seem to be sensitive across frequency. In contrast to FAII afferents, SAI and SAII afferents tended to demonstrate optimal entrainment to frequencies below 20 Hz and FAI afferents faithfully encoded frequencies between 8 and 60 Hz. Contrary to the selective activation of distinct afferent classes in the hand, application of class-specific frequencies in the foot sole is confounded due to the high sensitivity of FAII afferents. These findings may aid in the development of sensorimotor control models or the design of balance enhancement interventions.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Our work provides a mechanistic look at the capacity of foot sole cutaneous afferents to respond to vibration of varying frequency and amplitude. We found that foot sole afferent classes are uniquely tuned to vibration stimuli; however, unlike in the hand, they cannot be independently activated by class-specific frequencies. Viewing the foot sole as a sensory structure, the present findings may aid in the refinement of sensorimotor control models and design of balance enhancement interventions.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cutaneous afferents; foot sole; mechanoreceptor; microneurography; vibration

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28679842      PMCID: PMC5626905          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00647.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  32 in total

1.  Evidence for strong synaptic coupling between single tactile afferents from the sole of the foot and motoneurons supplying leg muscles.

Authors:  James B Fallon; Leah R Bent; Penelope A McNulty; Vaughan G Macefield
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Mechanical sensibility of the sole of the foot determined with vibratory stimuli of varying frequency.

Authors:  J Kekoni; H Hämäläinen; J Rautio; T Tukeva
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Mechanoreceptive afferents in the human sural nerve.

Authors:  M Trulsson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes.

Authors:  S L Zeger; K Y Liang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Detection of tactile stimuli. Thresholds of afferent units related to psychophysical thresholds in the human hand.

Authors:  R S Johansson; A B Vallbo
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Responses of mechanoreceptive afferent units in the glabrous skin of the human hand to sinusoidal skin displacements.

Authors:  R S Johansson; U Landström; R Lundström
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1982-07-22       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Noise-enhanced balance control in patients with diabetes and patients with stroke.

Authors:  Attila A Priplata; Benjamin L Patritti; James B Niemi; Richard Hughes; Denise C Gravelle; Lewis A Lipsitz; Aristidis Veves; Joel Stein; Paolo Bonato; James J Collins
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 10.422

8.  The functional role of sensory inputs from the foot: stabilizing human standing posture during voluntary and vibration-induced body sway.

Authors:  R Hayashi; A Miyake; S Watanabe
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.304

9.  Thresholds of skin sensitivity are partially influenced by mechanical properties of the skin on the foot sole.

Authors:  Nicholas D J Strzalkowski; John J Triano; Chris K Lam; Cale A Templeton; Leah R Bent
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2015-06

10.  Cutaneous stimulation of discrete regions of the sole during locomotion produces "sensory steering" of the foot.

Authors:  E Paul Zehr; Tsuyoshi Nakajima; Trevor Barss; Taryn Klarner; Stefanie Miklosovic; Rinaldo A Mezzarane; Matthew Nurse; Tomoyoshi Komiyama
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2014-08-08
View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Cutaneous afferent innervation of the human foot sole: what can we learn from single-unit recordings?

Authors:  Nicholas D J Strzalkowski; Ryan M Peters; J Timothy Inglis; Leah R Bent
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Cutaneous sensitivity in unilateral trans-tibial amputees.

Authors:  Cale A Templeton; Nicholas D J Strzalkowski; Patti Galvin; Leah R Bent
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Adding body load modifies the vibratory sensation of the foot sole and affects the postural control.

Authors:  Yves Jammes; Eva Ferrand; Corentin Fraud; Alain Boussuges; Jean Paul Weber
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2018-08-17

4.  Strong association between vibration perception thresholds at low frequencies (4 and 8 Hz), neuropathic symptoms and diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  Eero Lindholm; Magnus Löndahl; Katarina Fagher; Jan Apelqvist; Lars B Dahlin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The effect of age, sex and a firm-textured surface on postural control.

Authors:  Francesco Palazzo; Alessandra Nardi; Niloofar Lamouchideli; Alfio Caronti; Anas Alashram; Elvira Padua; Giuseppe Annino
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Cutaneous Sensitivity Across Regions of the Foot Sole and Dorsum are Influenced by Foot Posture.

Authors:  Simone G V S Smith; Maiya K Yokich; Shawn M Beaudette; Stephen H M Brown; Leah R Bent
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-01-13

7.  Vibration Sensitivity Is Associated With Functional Balance After Unilateral Transtibial Amputation.

Authors:  Mayank Seth; Emma H Beisheim-Ryan; Ryan T Pohlig; John Robert Horne; Gregory E Hicks; Jaclyn M Sions
Journal:  Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl       Date:  2021-10-12

Review 8.  The correlation between physical and emotional stabilities: a cross-sectional observational preliminary study.

Authors:  Michal Elboim-Gabyzon; Michal Pitluk; Einat Shuper Engelhard
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 5.348

9.  Lower-limb muscle responses evoked with noisy vibrotactile foot sole stimulation.

Authors:  Ryan M Peters; Robyn L Mildren; Aimee J Hill; Mark G Carpenter; Jean-Sébastien Blouin; J Timothy Inglis
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2020-08

10.  Larger contactor area increases low-frequency vibratory sensitivity in hairy skin.

Authors:  Daniel Schmidt; Guenther Schlee; Andresa M C Germano; Thomas L Milani
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.