Literature DB >> 19118155

Signals of motor command bias joint position sense in the presence of feedback from proprioceptors.

Janette L Smith1, Matthew Crawford, Uwe Proske, Janet L Taylor, Simon C Gandevia.   

Abstract

Joint position sense is believed to be mediated by muscle afferent signals. Because a "phantom" hand produced by a sensory and motor nerve block appears to move in the direction of voluntary effort, signals of "motor command" or "effort" can influence perceived joint position. To determine whether this occurs when sensory signals are available, three studies assessed position sense when motor command and afferent signals were available, but joint movement was prevented. First, the hand was positioned to stop movement at the proximal joint of the middle finger, and movement at the distal joint was impossible because the muscles had been "disengaged". Voluntary efforts produced illusory position changes in the direction of the effort (12.6 +/- 2.0 degrees distal joint; 12.3 +/- 2.3 degrees proximal joint for efforts at 30% maximum; means +/- SD). Second, when subjects attempted to move the index finger under isometric conditions, the index finger appeared to move 7.4 +/- 1.2 degrees in the direction of efforts. These illusions graded with the level of effort (10 or 30% maximum) and far exceeded any real joint movement. Finally, because changes in muscle afferent feedback might have accompanied the voluntary efforts, all forearm and hand muscles were completely paralyzed by locally infused rocuronium. During paralysis, passive wrist position was signaled accurately, but, during attempted efforts (30% maximum), perceived wrist position changed by 9.7 +/- 4.9 degrees . Before paralysis, isometric efforts changed it by 6.7 +/- 3.6 degrees . Thus all studies concur: when joint movement is prevented, signals of motor command contribute to joint position sense.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19118155     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.91365.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  34 in total

1.  Dynamic changes in the perceived posture of the hand during ischaemic anaesthesia of the arm.

Authors:  N Inui; L D Walsh; J L Taylor; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 2.  Constraints for control of the human hand.

Authors:  Hiske van Duinen; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  The illusion of changed position and movement from vibrating one arm is altered by vision or movement of the other arm.

Authors:  Masahiko Izumizaki; Mikio Tsuge; Lena Akai; Uwe Proske; Ikuo Homma
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Vibrotactile stimulation of fast-adapting cutaneous afferents from the foot modulates proprioception at the ankle joint.

Authors:  Robyn L Mildren; Leah R Bent
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2016-01-28

5.  The combined effect of muscle contraction history and motor commands on human position sense.

Authors:  Lee D Walsh; Janette L Smith; Simon C Gandevia; Janet L Taylor
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The contribution of motor commands to position sense differs between elbow and wrist.

Authors:  Lee D Walsh; Uwe Proske; Trevor J Allen; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 7.  The kinaesthetic senses.

Authors:  Uwe Proske; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-07-06       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Modulation of proprioceptive inflow when initiating a step influences postural adjustments.

Authors:  Hélène Ruget; Jean Blouin; Thelma Coyle; Laurence Mouchnino
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Where is your arm? Variations in proprioception across space and tasks.

Authors:  Christina T Fuentes; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Illusory movements of a phantom hand grade with the duration and magnitude of motor commands.

Authors:  Lee D Walsh; Simon C Gandevia; Janet L Taylor
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.