Astrid Zech1, Stephanie Meining2, Kirsten Hötting3, Dominik Liebl4, Klaus Mattes2, Karsten Hollander5,6. 1. Department of Human Movement Science and Exercise Physiology, Institute of Sport Science, University of Jena, Seidelstraße 20, 07749, Jena, Germany. astrid.zech@uni-jena.de. 2. Institute of Human Movement Science, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany. 3. Institute of Psychology, Biological Psychology and Neuropsychology, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany. 4. Institute of Statistics, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany. 5. Department of Sports and Rehabilitation Medicine, BG Trauma Hospital of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany. 6. Department of Sports and Exercise Medicine, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Although barefoot balancing has shown to be more challenging compared to shod balancing, it is still unclear whether this may also influence the balance learning effects. The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of barefoot and shod exercising on learning of a dynamic balance task. METHODS:Sixty healthy and physically active adults (mean age 25.3 ± 3.4 years) were randomly allocated into one of three groups (barefoot, shod and controls). The barefoot and shod intervention groups exercised once weekly over 7 weeks on a stability platform with an unstable surface. Each training session included 15 trials over 30 s. Before and after the intervention period, all participants completed two balance tests (stability platform and Balance Error Scoring System = BESS) under barefoot and shod conditions. Group effects in stability gains (pre to post-test differences) were analysed using ANOVA. Development of balance learning curves during the intervention period was analysed using a mixed effects model. RESULTS:Balance times improved in both intervention groups (p < 0.001, 95% CI barefoot 5.82-9.22 s, shod 7.51-10.92 s) compared to controls. The barefoot intervention group showed a significantly less sloped balance learning curve compared to the shod intervention group (p = 0.033). No changes over time or differences between groups were found for the BESS test. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in the dynamic balance task did not differ between individuals exercising barefoot or with footwear although the progression was slower in the barefoot group. The lack of changes in the BESS supports the task-specificity of balance learning effects.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Although barefoot balancing has shown to be more challenging compared to shod balancing, it is still unclear whether this may also influence the balance learning effects. The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of barefoot and shod exercising on learning of a dynamic balance task. METHODS: Sixty healthy and physically active adults (mean age 25.3 ± 3.4 years) were randomly allocated into one of three groups (barefoot, shod and controls). The barefoot and shod intervention groups exercised once weekly over 7 weeks on a stability platform with an unstable surface. Each training session included 15 trials over 30 s. Before and after the intervention period, all participants completed two balance tests (stability platform and Balance Error Scoring System = BESS) under barefoot and shod conditions. Group effects in stability gains (pre to post-test differences) were analysed using ANOVA. Development of balance learning curves during the intervention period was analysed using a mixed effects model. RESULTS: Balance times improved in both intervention groups (p < 0.001, 95% CI barefoot 5.82-9.22 s, shod 7.51-10.92 s) compared to controls. The barefoot intervention group showed a significantly less sloped balance learning curve compared to the shod intervention group (p = 0.033). No changes over time or differences between groups were found for the BESS test. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in the dynamic balance task did not differ between individuals exercising barefoot or with footwear although the progression was slower in the barefoot group. The lack of changes in the BESS supports the task-specificity of balance learning effects.
Entities:
Keywords:
Balance; Barefoot; Motor learning; Postural control; Shod
Authors: Karsten Hollander; Christoph Heidt; Babette C VAN DER Zwaard; Klaus-Michael Braumann; Astrid Zech Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Astrid Zech; Ranel Venter; Johanna E de Villiers; Susanne Sehner; Karl Wegscheider; Karsten Hollander Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2018-04-25 Impact factor: 3.418
Authors: Karsten Hollander; Johanna Elsabe de Villiers; Ranel Venter; Susanne Sehner; Karl Wegscheider; Klaus-Michael Braumann; Astrid Zech Journal: Int J Sports Med Date: 2017-11-16 Impact factor: 3.118
Authors: Cylie M Williams; Stewart C Morrison; Kade Paterson; Katherine Gobbi; Sam Burton; Matthew Hill; Emma Harber; Helen Banwell Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-06-09 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Cylie M Williams; Helen A Banwell; Kade L Paterson; Katherine Gobbi; Sam Burton; Matthew Hill; Emma Harber; Stewart C Morrison Journal: J Foot Ankle Res Date: 2022-10-12 Impact factor: 3.050