Daniel R Hulsey1, Seth A Hays2, Navid Khodaparast3, Andrea Ruiz4, Priyanka Das5, Robert L Rennaker6, Michael P Kilgard3. 1. School of Behavioral Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, 800 West Campbell Road, GR41, Richardson, TX 75080-3021, USA. 2. School of Behavioral Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, 800 West Campbell Road, GR41, Richardson, TX 75080-3021, USA; Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science, The University of Texas at Dallas, 800 West Campbell Road, Richardson, TX 75080-3021, USA; Texas Biomedical Device Center, The University of Texas at Dallas, 800 West Campbell Road, Richardson, TX 75080-3021, USA. Electronic address: seth.hays@utdallas.edu. 3. School of Behavioral Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, 800 West Campbell Road, GR41, Richardson, TX 75080-3021, USA; Texas Biomedical Device Center, The University of Texas at Dallas, 800 West Campbell Road, Richardson, TX 75080-3021, USA. 4. Texas Biomedical Device Center, The University of Texas at Dallas, 800 West Campbell Road, Richardson, TX 75080-3021, USA. 5. Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science, The University of Texas at Dallas, 800 West Campbell Road, Richardson, TX 75080-3021, USA. 6. School of Behavioral Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, 800 West Campbell Road, GR41, Richardson, TX 75080-3021, USA; Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science, The University of Texas at Dallas, 800 West Campbell Road, Richardson, TX 75080-3021, USA; Texas Biomedical Device Center, The University of Texas at Dallas, 800 West Campbell Road, Richardson, TX 75080-3021, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) paired with forelimb training drives robust, specific reorganization of movement representations in the motor cortex. The mechanisms that underlie VNS-dependent enhancement of map plasticity are largely unknown. The cholinergic nucleus basalis (NB) is a critical substrate in cortical plasticity, and several studies suggest that VNS activates cholinergic circuitry. OBJECTIVE: We examined whether the NB is required for VNS-dependent enhancement of map plasticity in the motor cortex. METHODS: Rats were trained to perform a lever pressing task and then received injections of the immunotoxin 192-IgG-saporin to selectively lesion cholinergic neurons of the NB. After lesion, rats underwent five days of motor training during which VNS was paired with successful trials. At the conclusion of behavioral training, intracortical microstimulation was used to document movement representations in motor cortex. RESULTS: VNS paired with forelimb training resulted in a substantial increase in the representation of proximal forelimb in rats with an intact NB compared to untrained controls. NB lesions prevent this VNS-dependent increase in proximal forelimb area and result in representations similar to untrained controls. Motor performance was similar between groups, suggesting that differences in forelimb function cannot account for the difference in proximal forelimb representation. CONCLUSIONS: Together, these findings indicate that the NB is required for VNS-dependent enhancement of plasticity in the motor cortex and may provide insight into the mechanisms that underlie the benefits of VNS therapy.
BACKGROUND: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) paired with forelimb training drives robust, specific reorganization of movement representations in the motor cortex. The mechanisms that underlie VNS-dependent enhancement of map plasticity are largely unknown. The cholinergic nucleus basalis (NB) is a critical substrate in cortical plasticity, and several studies suggest that VNS activates cholinergic circuitry. OBJECTIVE: We examined whether the NB is required for VNS-dependent enhancement of map plasticity in the motor cortex. METHODS:Rats were trained to perform a lever pressing task and then received injections of the immunotoxin 192-IgG-saporin to selectively lesion cholinergic neurons of the NB. After lesion, rats underwent five days of motor training during which VNS was paired with successful trials. At the conclusion of behavioral training, intracortical microstimulation was used to document movement representations in motor cortex. RESULTS: VNS paired with forelimb training resulted in a substantial increase in the representation of proximal forelimb in rats with an intact NB compared to untrained controls. NB lesions prevent this VNS-dependent increase in proximal forelimb area and result in representations similar to untrained controls. Motor performance was similar between groups, suggesting that differences in forelimb function cannot account for the difference in proximal forelimb representation. CONCLUSIONS: Together, these findings indicate that the NB is required for VNS-dependent enhancement of plasticity in the motor cortex and may provide insight into the mechanisms that underlie the benefits of VNS therapy.
Authors: Annelies Grimonprez; Robrecht Raedt; Jeanelle Portelli; Ine Dauwe; Lars Emil Larsen; Charlotte Bouckaert; Jean Delbeke; Evelien Carrette; Alfred Meurs; Veerle De Herdt; Paul Boon; Kristl Vonck Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2015-05-27 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: David T Pruitt; Ariel N Schmid; Lily J Kim; Caroline M Abe; Jenny L Trieu; Connie Choua; Seth A Hays; Michael P Kilgard; Robert L Rennaker Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2015-08-05 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: M S George; H A Sackeim; A J Rush; L B Marangell; Z Nahas; M M Husain; S Lisanby; T Burt; J Goldman; J C Ballenger Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2000-02-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: H A Sackeim; A J Rush; M S George; L B Marangell; M M Husain; Z Nahas; C R Johnson; S Seidman; C Giller; S Haines; R K Simpson; R R Goodman Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Crystal T Engineer; Navzer D Engineer; Jonathan R Riley; Jonathan D Seale; Michael P Kilgard Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2015-01-26 Impact factor: 8.955
Authors: David T Pruitt; Ariel N Schmid; Tanya T Danaphongse; Kate E Flanagan; Robert A Morrison; Michael P Kilgard; Robert L Rennaker; Seth A Hays Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2016-07-05 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: Kristofer W Loerwald; Elizabeth P Buell; Michael S Borland; Robert L Rennaker; Seth A Hays; Michael P Kilgard Journal: Neuroscience Date: 2018-07-29 Impact factor: 3.590
Authors: Allison S Hyngstrom; Spencer A Murphy; Jennifer Nguyen; Brian D Schmit; Francesco Negro; David D Gutterman; Matthew J Durand Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2018-02-08
Authors: Daniel R Hulsey; Jonathan R Riley; Kristofer W Loerwald; Robert L Rennaker; Michael P Kilgard; Seth A Hays Journal: Exp Neurol Date: 2016-12-14 Impact factor: 5.330
Authors: Michael S Borland; Crystal T Engineer; William A Vrana; Nicole A Moreno; Navzer D Engineer; Sven Vanneste; Pryanka Sharma; Meghan C Pantalia; Mark C Lane; Robert L Rennaker; Michael P Kilgard Journal: Neuroscience Date: 2017-11-10 Impact factor: 3.590
Authors: Daniel R Hulsey; Christine M Shedd; Sadmaan F Sarker; Michael P Kilgard; Seth A Hays Journal: Exp Neurol Date: 2019-06-07 Impact factor: 5.330
Authors: Robert A Morrison; Tanya T Danaphongse; David T Pruitt; Katherine S Adcock; Jobin K Mathew; Stephanie T Abe; Dina M Abdulla; Robert L Rennaker; Michael P Kilgard; Seth A Hays Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2020-05-28 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: David T Pruitt; Tanya T Danaphongse; Ariel N Schmid; Robert A Morrison; Michael P Kilgard; Robert L Rennaker; Seth A Hays Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2017-07-19 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Eric C Meyers; Bleyda R Solorzano; Justin James; Patrick D Ganzer; Elaine S Lai; Robert L Rennaker; Michael P Kilgard; Seth A Hays Journal: Stroke Date: 2018-01-25 Impact factor: 7.914