Literature DB >> 29371435

Vagus Nerve Stimulation Enhances Stable Plasticity and Generalization of Stroke Recovery.

Eric C Meyers1, Bleyda R Solorzano2, Justin James2, Patrick D Ganzer2, Elaine S Lai2, Robert L Rennaker2, Michael P Kilgard2, Seth A Hays2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Chronic impairment of the arm and hand is a common consequence of stroke. Animal and human studies indicate that brief bursts of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in conjunction with rehabilitative training improve recovery of motor function after stroke. In this study, we tested whether VNS could promote generalization, long-lasting recovery, and structural plasticity in motor networks.
METHODS: Rats were trained on a fully automated, quantitative task that measures forelimb supination. On task proficiency, unilateral cortical and subcortical ischemic lesions were administered. One week after ischemic lesion, rats were randomly assigned to receive 6 weeks of rehabilitative training on the supination task with or without VNS. Rats then underwent 4 weeks of testing on a task assessing forelimb strength to test generalization of recovery. Finally, the durability of VNS benefits was tested on the supination task 2 months after the cessation of VNS. After the conclusion of behavioral testing, viral tracing was performed to assess synaptic connectivity in motor networks.
RESULTS: VNS enhances plasticity in corticospinal motor networks to increase synaptic connectivity to musculature of the rehabilitated forelimb. Adding VNS more than doubled the benefit of rehabilitative training, and the improvements lasted months after the end of VNS. Pairing VNS with supination training also significantly improved performance on a similar, but untrained task that emphasized volitional forelimb strength, suggesting generalization of forelimb recovery.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first evidence that VNS paired with rehabilitative training after stroke (1) doubles long-lasting recovery on a complex task involving forelimb supination, (2) doubles recovery on a simple motor task that was not paired with VNS, and (3) enhances structural plasticity in motor networks.
© 2018 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  forelimb; rats; rehabilitation; supination; vagus nerve

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29371435      PMCID: PMC6454573          DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.019202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  34 in total

1.  Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke.

Authors:  Craig D Takahashi; Lucy Der-Yeghiaian; Vu Le; Rehan R Motiwala; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 2.  Descending pathways in motor control.

Authors:  Roger N Lemon
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 12.449

3.  Reaching training in rats with spinal cord injury promotes plasticity and task specific recovery.

Authors:  J Girgis; D Merrett; S Kirkland; G A S Metz; V Verge; K Fouad
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 4.  Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour.

Authors:  Timothy H Murphy; Dale Corbett
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Compensation aids skilled reaching in aging and in recovery from forelimb motor cortex stroke in the rat.

Authors:  M Alaverdashvili; I Q Whishaw
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2010-02-08       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Chondroitinase ABC treatment opens a window of opportunity for task-specific rehabilitation.

Authors:  Guillermo García-Alías; Stanley Barkhuysen; Miranda Buckle; James W Fawcett
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-09       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Pseudorabies virus expressing enhanced green fluorescent protein: A tool for in vitro electrophysiological analysis of transsynaptically labeled neurons in identified central nervous system circuits.

Authors:  B N Smith; B W Banfield; C A Smeraski; C L Wilcox; F E Dudek; L W Enquist; G E Pickard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Quantitative and qualitative impairments in skilled reaching in the mouse (Mus musculus) after a focal motor cortex stroke.

Authors:  Tracy D Farr; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Remodeling of the corticospinal innervation and spontaneous behavioral recovery after ischemic stroke in adult mice.

Authors:  Zhongwu Liu; Rui Lan Zhang; Yi Li; Yisheng Cui; Michael Chopp
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Combination of NEP 1-40 treatment and motor training enhances behavioral recovery after a focal cortical infarct in rats.

Authors:  Pei-chun Fang; Scott Barbay; Erik J Plautz; Erica Hoover; Stephen M Strittmatter; Randolph J Nudo
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  35 in total

Review 1.  New Directions in Treatments Targeting Stroke Recovery.

Authors:  David J Lin; Seth P Finklestein; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Translating concepts of neural repair after stroke: Structural and functional targets for recovery.

Authors:  Robert W Regenhardt; Hajime Takase; Eng H Lo; David J Lin
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.406

3.  Automated Forelimb Tasks for Rodents: Current Advantages and Limitations, and Future Promise.

Authors:  Anil Sindhurakar; Samuel D Butensky; Jason B Carmel
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 3.919

4.  Norepinephrine and serotonin are required for vagus nerve stimulation directed cortical plasticity.

Authors:  Daniel R Hulsey; Christine M Shedd; Sadmaan F Sarker; Michael P Kilgard; Seth A Hays
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 5.330

5.  A limited range of vagus nerve stimulation intensities produce motor cortex reorganization when delivered during training.

Authors:  Robert A Morrison; Tanya T Danaphongse; David T Pruitt; Katherine S Adcock; Jobin K Mathew; Stephanie T Abe; Dina M Abdulla; Robert L Rennaker; Michael P Kilgard; Seth A Hays
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Preclinical Studies of Neuroplasticity Following Experimental Brain Injury.

Authors:  David T Bundy; Randolph J Nudo
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Vagus Nerve Stimulation Rate and Duration Determine whether Sensory Pairing Produces Neural Plasticity.

Authors:  Elizabeth P Buell; Michael S Borland; Kristofer W Loerwald; Collin Chandler; Seth A Hays; Crystal T Engineer; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 8.  Clinical neuroprosthetics: Today and tomorrow.

Authors:  Morgan B Lee; Daniel R Kramer; Terrance Peng; Michael F Barbaro; Charles Y Liu; Spencer Kellis; Brian Lee
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 1.961

9.  Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Rehabilitative Training Enhances Motor Recovery After Bilateral Spinal Cord Injury to Cervical Forelimb Motor Pools.

Authors:  Michael J Darrow; Miranda Torres; Maria J Sosa; Tanya T Danaphongse; Zainab Haider; Robert L Rennaker; Michael P Kilgard; Seth A Hays
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 10.  Vagus Nerve Stimulation and the Cardiovascular System.

Authors:  Michael J Capilupi; Samantha M Kerath; Lance B Becker
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 6.915

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.