Literature DB >> 29129793

The Interval Between VNS-Tone Pairings Determines the Extent of Cortical Map Plasticity.

Michael S Borland1, Crystal T Engineer2, William A Vrana3, Nicole A Moreno1, Navzer D Engineer4, Sven Vanneste1, Pryanka Sharma3, Meghan C Pantalia3, Mark C Lane3, Robert L Rennaker5, Michael P Kilgard1.   

Abstract

Repeatedly pairing vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) with a tone or movement drives highly specific and long-lasting plasticity in auditory or motor cortex, respectively. Based on this robust enhancement of plasticity, VNS paired with rehabilitative training has emerged as a potential therapy to improve recovery, even when delivered long after the neurological insult. Development of VNS delivery paradigms that reduce therapy duration and maximize efficacy would facilitate clinical translation. The goal of the current study was to determine whether primary auditory cortex (A1) plasticity can be generated more quickly by shortening the interval between VNS-tone pairing events or by delivering fewer VNS-tone pairing events. While shortening the inter-stimulus interval between VNS-tone pairing events resulted in significant A1 plasticity, reducing the number of VNS-tone pairing events failed to alter A1 responses. Additionally, shortening the inter-stimulus interval between VNS-tone pairing events failed to normalize neural and behavioral responses following acoustic trauma. Extending the interval between VNS-tone pairing events yielded comparable A1 frequency map plasticity to the standard protocol, but did so without increasing neural excitability. These results indicate that the duration of the VNS-event pairing session is an important parameter that can be adjusted to optimize neural plasticity for different clinical needs.
Copyright © 2017 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  VNS; acoustic trauma; auditory cortex; interval between stimulations; plasticity; vagal

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29129793      PMCID: PMC5766390          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  42 in total

1.  Repeatedly pairing vagus nerve stimulation with a movement reorganizes primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Benjamin A Porter; Navid Khodaparast; Tabbassum Fayyaz; Ryan J Cheung; Syed S Ahmed; William A Vrana; Robert L Rennaker; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Vagal nerve stimulation modifies neuronal activity and the proteome of excitatory synapses of amygdala/piriform cortex.

Authors:  Georgia M Alexander; Yang Zhong Huang; Erik J Soderblom; Xiao-Ping He; M Arthur Moseley; James O McNamara
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 5.372

3.  Cortical Map Plasticity as a Function of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Intensity.

Authors:  M S Borland; W A Vrana; N A Moreno; E A Fogarty; E P Buell; P Sharma; C T Engineer; M P Kilgard
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 8.955

4.  Spaced learning enhances subsequent recognition memory by reducing neural repetition suppression.

Authors:  Gui Xue; Leilei Mei; Chuansheng Chen; Zhong-Lin Lu; Russell Poldrack; Qi Dong
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The timing and amount of vagus nerve stimulation during rehabilitative training affect poststroke recovery of forelimb strength.

Authors:  Seth A Hays; Navid Khodaparast; Andrea Ruiz; Andrew M Sloan; Daniel R Hulsey; Robert L Rennaker; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 1.837

6.  Vagus nerve stimulation delivered during motor rehabilitation improves recovery in a rat model of stroke.

Authors:  Navid Khodaparast; Seth A Hays; Andrew M Sloan; Tabbassum Fayyaz; Daniel R Hulsey; Robert L Rennaker; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.919

7.  Gap detection deficits in rats with tinnitus: a potential novel screening tool.

Authors:  Jeremy G Turner; Thomas J Brozoski; Carol A Bauer; Jennifer L Parrish; Kristin Myers; Larry F Hughes; Donald M Caspary
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 8.  Beyond cochlear implants: awakening the deafened brain.

Authors:  David R Moore; Robert V Shannon
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 9.  Molecular determinants of the spacing effect.

Authors:  Faisal Naqib; Wayne S Sossin; Carole A Farah
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 3.599

10.  The rates of protein synthesis and degradation account for the differential response of neurons to spaced and massed training protocols.

Authors:  Faisal Naqib; Carole A Farah; Christopher C Pack; Wayne S Sossin
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  11 in total

1.  Varying Stimulation Parameters to Improve Cortical Plasticity Generated by VNS-tone Pairing.

Authors:  Kristofer W Loerwald; Elizabeth P Buell; Michael S Borland; Robert L Rennaker; Seth A Hays; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2018-07-29       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Norepinephrine and serotonin are required for vagus nerve stimulation directed cortical plasticity.

Authors:  Daniel R Hulsey; Christine M Shedd; Sadmaan F Sarker; Michael P Kilgard; Seth A Hays
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 5.330

3.  Vagus Nerve Stimulation Rate and Duration Determine whether Sensory Pairing Produces Neural Plasticity.

Authors:  Elizabeth P Buell; Michael S Borland; Kristofer W Loerwald; Collin Chandler; Seth A Hays; Crystal T Engineer; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Pairing vagus nerve stimulation with tones drives plasticity across the auditory pathway.

Authors:  Michael S Borland; Will A Vrana; Nicole A Moreno; Elizabeth A Fogarty; Elizabeth P Buell; Sven Vanneste; Michael P Kilgard; Crystal T Engineer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The tactile experience paired with vagus nerve stimulation determines the degree of sensory recovery after chronic nerve damage.

Authors:  Michael J Darrow; Tabarak M Mian; Miranda Torres; Zainab Haider; Tanya Danaphongse; Armin Seyedahmadi; Robert L Rennaker; Seth A Hays; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Efficacy profile of noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation on cortical spreading depression susceptibility and the tissue response in a rat model.

Authors:  Tzu-Ting Liu; Andreia Morais; Cenk Ayata; Jiin-Cherng Yen; Tsubasa Takizawa; Inge Mulder; Bruce J Simon; Shih-Pin Chen; Shuu-Jiun Wang
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 7.277

7.  Closed-loop neuromodulation restores network connectivity and motor control after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Patrick D Ganzer; Michael J Darrow; Eric C Meyers; Bleyda R Solorzano; Andrea D Ruiz; Nicole M Robertson; Katherine S Adcock; Justin T James; Han S Jeong; April M Becker; Mark P Goldberg; David T Pruitt; Seth A Hays; Michael P Kilgard; Robert L Rennaker
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 8.  Targeted Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Rehabilitation After Stroke.

Authors:  Navzer D Engineer; Teresa J Kimberley; Cecília N Prudente; Jesse Dawson; W Brent Tarver; Seth A Hays
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 5.152

9.  Enhancing plasticity in central networks improves motor and sensory recovery after nerve damage.

Authors:  Eric C Meyers; Nimit Kasliwal; Bleyda R Solorzano; Elaine Lai; Geetanjali Bendale; Abigail Berry; Patrick D Ganzer; Mario Romero-Ortega; Robert L Rennaker; Michael P Kilgard; Seth A Hays
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 17.694

Review 10.  A Review of Parameter Settings for Invasive and Non-invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Applied in Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders.

Authors:  Sean L Thompson; Georgia H O'Leary; Christopher W Austelle; Elise Gruber; Alex T Kahn; Andrew J Manett; Baron Short; Bashar W Badran
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.