Literature DB >> 32473844

A limited range of vagus nerve stimulation intensities produce motor cortex reorganization when delivered during training.

Robert A Morrison1, Tanya T Danaphongse2, David T Pruitt2, Katherine S Adcock3, Jobin K Mathew2, Stephanie T Abe2, Dina M Abdulla3, Robert L Rennaker3, Michael P Kilgard3, Seth A Hays4.   

Abstract

Pairing vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) with rehabilitation has emerged as a potential strategy to improve recovery after neurological injury, an effect ascribed to VNS-dependent enhancement of synaptic plasticity. Previous studies demonstrate that pairing VNS with forelimb training increases forelimb movement representations in motor cortex. However, it is not known whether VNS-dependent enhancement of plasticity is restricted to forelimb training or whether VNS paired with other movements could induce plasticity of other motor representations. We tested the hypothesis that VNS paired with orofacial movements associated with chewing during an unskilled task would drive a specific increase in jaw representation in motor cortex compared to equivalent behavioral experience without VNS. Rats performed a behavioral task in which VNS at a specified intensity between 0 and 1.2 mA was paired with chewing 200 times per day for five days. Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) was then used to document movement representations in motor cortex. VNS paired with chewing at 0.8 mA significantly increased motor cortex jaw representation compared to equivalent behavioral training without stimulation (Bonferroni-corrected unpaired t-test, p < 0.01). Higher and lower intensities failed to alter cortical plasticity. No changes in other movement representations or total motor cortex area were observed between groups. These results demonstrate that 0.8 mA VNS paired with training drives robust plasticity specific to the paired movement, is not restricted to forelimb representations, and occurs with training on an unskilled task. This suggests that moderate intensity VNS may be a useful adjuvant to enhance plasticity and support benefits of rehabilitative therapies targeting functions beyond upper limb movement.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cortical reorganization; Intracortical microstimulation; Motor cortex; Orofacial activity; Vagus nerve stimulation

Year:  2020        PMID: 32473844      PMCID: PMC7413489          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2020.112705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  45 in total

1.  Repeatedly pairing vagus nerve stimulation with a movement reorganizes primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Benjamin A Porter; Navid Khodaparast; Tabbassum Fayyaz; Ryan J Cheung; Syed S Ahmed; William A Vrana; Robert L Rennaker; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Forelimb training drives transient map reorganization in ipsilateral motor cortex.

Authors:  David T Pruitt; Ariel N Schmid; Tanya T Danaphongse; Kate E Flanagan; Robert A Morrison; Michael P Kilgard; Robert L Rennaker; Seth A Hays
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 3.  Mastication and its control by the brain stem.

Authors:  J P Lund
Journal:  Crit Rev Oral Biol Med       Date:  1991

4.  The organization of the rat motor cortex: a microstimulation mapping study.

Authors:  E J Neafsey; E L Bold; G Haas; K M Hurley-Gius; G Quirk; C F Sievert; R R Terreberry
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Norepinephrine and serotonin are required for vagus nerve stimulation directed cortical plasticity.

Authors:  Daniel R Hulsey; Christine M Shedd; Sadmaan F Sarker; Michael P Kilgard; Seth A Hays
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 5.330

6.  Pairing vagus nerve stimulation with tones drives plasticity across the auditory pathway.

Authors:  Michael S Borland; Will A Vrana; Nicole A Moreno; Elizabeth A Fogarty; Elizabeth P Buell; Sven Vanneste; Michael P Kilgard; Crystal T Engineer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Cortical map plasticity as a function of vagus nerve stimulation rate.

Authors:  E P Buell; K W Loerwald; C T Engineer; M S Borland; J M Buell; C A Kelly; I I Khan; S A Hays; M P Kilgard
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  Distinct Eligibility Traces for LTP and LTD in Cortical Synapses.

Authors:  Kaiwen He; Marco Huertas; Su Z Hong; XiaoXiu Tie; Johannes W Hell; Harel Shouval; Alfredo Kirkwood
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Evidence for plasticity in white-matter tracts of patients with chronic Broca's aphasia undergoing intense intonation-based speech therapy.

Authors:  Gottfried Schlaug; Sarah Marchina; Andrea Norton
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Upper-Limb Rehabilitation After Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Jesse Dawson; David Pierce; Anand Dixit; Teresa J Kimberley; Michele Robertson; Brent Tarver; Omar Hilmi; John McLean; Kirsten Forbes; Michael P Kilgard; Robert L Rennaker; Steven C Cramer; Matthew Walters; Navzer Engineer
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  8 in total

1.  Vagus nerve stimulation does not improve recovery of forelimb motor or somatosensory function in a model of neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Katherine S Adcock; Tanya Danaphongse; Sarah Jacob; Harshini Rallapalli; Miranda Torres; Zainab Haider; Armin Seyedahmadi; Robert A Morrison; Robert L Rennaker; Michael P Kilgard; Seth A Hays
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Vagus nerve stimulation paired with rehabilitation for upper limb motor function after ischaemic stroke (VNS-REHAB): a randomised, blinded, pivotal, device trial.

Authors:  Jesse Dawson; Charles Y Liu; Gerard E Francisco; Steven C Cramer; Steven L Wolf; Anand Dixit; Jen Alexander; Rushna Ali; Benjamin L Brown; Wuwei Feng; Louis DeMark; Leigh R Hochberg; Steven A Kautz; Arshad Majid; Michael W O'Dell; David Pierce; Cecília N Prudente; Jessica Redgrave; Duncan L Turner; Navzer D Engineer; Teresa J Kimberley
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  High intensity VNS disrupts VNS-mediated plasticity in motor cortex.

Authors:  Robert A Morrison; Tanya T Danaphongse; Stephanie T Abe; Madison E Stevens; Vikram Ezhil; Armin Seyedahmadi; Katherine S Adcock; Robert L Rennaker; Michael P Kilgard; Seth A Hays
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 4.  Validation of a parameterized, open-source model of nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Jesse E Bucksot; Collin R Chandler; Navaporn M Intharuck; Robert L Rennaker; Michael P Kilgard; Seth A Hays
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 5.  Targeting the Autonomic Nervous System for Risk Stratification, Outcome Prediction and Neuromodulation in Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Angelica Carandina; Giulia Lazzeri; Davide Villa; Alessio Di Fonzo; Sara Bonato; Nicola Montano; Eleonora Tobaldini
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  Vagus Nerve Stimulation as a Potential Adjuvant to Rehabilitation for Post-stroke Motor Speech Disorders.

Authors:  Robert A Morrison; Seth A Hays; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Common Cholinergic, Noradrenergic, and Serotonergic Drugs Do Not Block VNS-Mediated Plasticity.

Authors:  Robert A Morrison; Stephanie T Abe; Tanya Danaphongse; Vikram Ezhil; Armaan Somaney; Katherine S Adcock; Robert L Rennaker; Michael P Kilgard; Seth A Hays
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation Promotes White Matter Repair and Improves Dysphagia Symptoms in Cerebral Ischemia Model Rats.

Authors:  Lu Long; Qianwen Zang; Gongwei Jia; Meng Fan; Liping Zhang; Yingqiang Qi; Yilin Liu; Lehua Yu; Sanrong Wang
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 3.558

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.