| Literature DB >> 26801894 |
Phred M Benham1,2, Christopher C Witt3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The ridges and valleys of the Andes create physical barriers that limit animal dispersal and cause deterministic local variation in rainfall. This has resulted in physical isolation of animal populations and variation in habitats, each of which has likely contributed to the evolution of high species diversity in the region. However, the relative influences of geographic isolation, ecoclimatic conditions, and their potential interactions remain poorly understood. To address this, we compared patterns of genetic and morphological diversity in Peruvian populations of the hummingbird Metallura tyrianthina.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26801894 PMCID: PMC4724075 DOI: 10.1186/s12862-016-0595-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Fig. 1a Map illustrating the distribution of all three Metallura tyrianthina subspecies that occur in Peru. Circles denote sampling sites for both genetic and bill length data; squares represent sampling sites for bill length data only. Blue points are sites where the habitat was characterized as humid montane forest and brown points semi-humid montane scrub. b Map of sampling sites from the department of Cusco, Peru. One pair of sites was from the humid (Carrizales) and drier (Urubamba) sides of the Cordillera de Vilcanota, separated by ~20 km. A second pair of sites was along the Manu Road, with a humid (Pillahuata) and drier (Paucartambo) site ~5 km apart. c Topographic profile of the Cordillera de Vilcanota, which exceeds 5000 m, and the Manu Road where a cordillera less than 4000 m in elevation separates the two sites along the Manu Road
Fig. 2a ND2 Bayesian phylogeny for Peruvian populations of Metallura tyrianthina. Posterior probabilities for each node printed above branches (* signifies 1.0 pp). The six geographically structured clades are lettered on all figures. Each clade is colored by subspecies as in panel c. b Median-joining haplotype network of ND2. Brown color indicates semi-humid montane scrub habitat; blue indicates humid montane forest. c Geographic distribution of each clade (A-F). Red dotted lines signify putative physical barriers that isolate the six clades
Proportion of genetic variance explained by geographic or climatic variation
| DA | Fst/(1-Fst) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | Geography | Climate | Shared | Geography | Climate | Shared |
| geog + [clim1,clim2] | 0.4001 | −0.0278 | 0.0660 | 0.1557 | 0.0078 | 0.0969 |
| geog + clim1 | 0.4838* | 0.0102 | −0.0176 | 0.2332 | 0.0578 | 0.0194 |
| geog + clim2 | 0.3392* | −0.0841 | 0.1270 | 0.1010 | −0.1316 | 0.1516 |
| geog + [temp,seas,prec] | 0.8526*** | 0.4035* | −0.3864 | 0.2404 | 0.1287 | 0.0122 |
| geog + prec | 0.4832* | 0.0095 | −0.0170 | 0.2321 | 0.0569 | 0.0205 |
| geog + seas | 0.4865* | 0.054 | −0.0204 | 0.3068 | 0.0545 | −0.0545 |
| geog + temp | 0.4917* | −0.0295 | −0.0256 | 0.2047 | −0.0928 | 0.0479 |
| geog + [prec,seas] | 0.3636 | −0.047 | 0.1026 | 0.1007 | −0.0349 | 0.1518 |
| geog + [prec,temp] | 0.5093 | −0.0238 | −0.0432 | 0.1870 | −0.0294 | 0.0655 |
| geog + [seas,temp] | 0.6909*** | 0.2009 | −0.2248 | 0.3160 | 0.0240 | −0.0635 |
Geographic distance (geog) is the Euclidean distance among sampling sites and climate is the proportion of variance explained by the different climatic variables included in each model. Clim1 and clim2 are the first two principal components of the entire 19 variable BioClim dataset, explaining 97 % of the variance in total. Temp, seas, and prec are the first principal components for temperature, seasonality, and precipitation BioClim variables, respectively. The proportion of variance shared by both geography and climate is reported in the columns labeled ‘shared’. High ‘shared’ values would indicate collinearity between ecological and geographic parameters; negative values are an artifact of subtracting adjusted R2 values to derive the shared proportion of variance [83]
*p < 0.5; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001
The two best models predicting bill length variation based on AICc analysis: (1) seasonality, precipitation and their interaction; and (2) seasonality alone
| Model | logL | k | AICc | ΔAICc | Model weights |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [seas][prec][seas*prec] | −310.02 | 5 | 630.29 | 0 | 0.7776 |
| [seas] | −313.34 | 3 | 632.79 | 2.50 | 0.2224 |
| [mass] | −379.04 | 3 | 764.18 | 133.89 | 0 |
The 21 models we evaluated include all 15 possible combinations of body mass, PC1 of seasonality (seas), PC1 of precipitation (prec), PC1 of temperature (temp) as well as all six pairwise interactions among the four predictor variables. Relative variable importance (the sum of model weights in which a particular variable appears) was much greater for seasonality (1.0) than precipitation (0.55), temperature (0.35), or body mass (0.37)
Fig. 3Linear regression of bill length versus a pairwise genetic differences (DA) and b linearized Fst among all populations. No significant relationships were found across all comparisons. c Boxplot of mean divergence in bill length between all humid sites, semi-humid sites, and among sites in different habitats. Mean divergence between habitats was significantly greater than that between habitats, whereas within habitat divergence did not differ
Fig. 4Bill length as a function of PC1 of seasonality (82.9 % of the variation). The linear regression model was highly significant (p < 0.0001) with an R2 of 0.44
Fst-values among pairwise comparisons of all four Cusco localities (Fig. 1b)
| Vilcanota | Manu Road | Humid | Semi-humid | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.802*** | −0.051ns | 0.167* | 0.814*** |
|
| 0.336*** | 0.184* | 0.290*** | 0.245*** |
|
| −0.055ns | −0.0387ns | 0.281* | −0.012ns |
|
| 0.368*** | −0.055ns | 0.229* | −0.069ns |
Vilcanota and Manu Road columns each represent a comparison between a pair of humid and semi-humid environments. Humid comparisons are between Carrizales and Pillahuata populations, semi-humid comparisons are between Urubamba and Paucartambo populations
ns p > 0.05; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001
Fig. 5a Topographic profiles of the two cordilleras separating sampling sites in the Vilcanota region and along the Manu Road (see Fig. 1c). Arrows with red lettering indicate mean migration rates (m) estimated from IMa2 analyses (Table 4). b Bill length differences among the four Cusco localities. Blue represents the two humid sites and brown the two drier sites. Asterisks indicate p-values for the comparisons of bill length between two pairs of adjacent populations in humid and semi-humid environments (* < 0.05; ** < 0.001; *** < 0.0001)
Parameter estimates for θ (4Neμ), divergence time (t), and symmetrical migration rates (m) inferred from IMa2 analyses
| Transect | θ1 | θ2 | θ ancestral |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vilcanota | 0.321 | 0.807 | 0.06 | 0.7985 | 2.098 |
| Manu Road | 1.402 | 4.00 | 1.521 | 0.031 | 39.922 |
| Humid | 6.000 | 0.140 | 0.587 | 0.026 | 39.702 |
| Semi-humid | 0.260 | 0.77 | 1.746 | 0.939 | 3.379 |
95 % HPD range for each parameter presented in parentheses. Mean parameter estimates represent the average across the three independent runs performed for all four comparisons. θ1 refers to estimates of θ for the semi-humid comparison for Vilcanota and Manu Road and θ2 for the humid site. For between humid sites and semi-humid site comparisons θ1 refers to sites from the Manu Road and θ2 the Vilcanota