Literature DB >> 26792517

Limits to the precision of gradient sensing with spatial communication and temporal integration.

Andrew Mugler1, Andre Levchenko2, Ilya Nemenman3.   

Abstract

Gradient sensing requires at least two measurements at different points in space. These measurements must then be communicated to a common location to be compared, which is unavoidably noisy. Although much is known about the limits of measurement precision by cells, the limits placed by the communication are not understood. Motivated by recent experiments, we derive the fundamental limits to the precision of gradient sensing in a multicellular system, accounting for communication and temporal integration. The gradient is estimated by comparing a "local" and a "global" molecular reporter of the external concentration, where the global reporter is exchanged between neighboring cells. Using the fluctuation-dissipation framework, we find, in contrast to the case when communication is ignored, that precision saturates with the number of cells independently of the measurement time duration, because communication establishes a maximum length scale over which sensory information can be reliably conveyed. Surprisingly, we also find that precision is improved if the local reporter is exchanged between cells as well, albeit more slowly than the global reporter. The reason is that whereas exchange of the local reporter weakens the comparison, it decreases the measurement noise. We term such a model "regional excitation-global inhibition." Our results demonstrate that fundamental sensing limits are necessarily sharpened when the need to communicate information is taken into account.

Keywords:  cell–cell communication; fluctuation–dissipation theorem; gradient sensing; linear response theory

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26792517      PMCID: PMC4760817          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1509597112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  34 in total

1.  Diverse sensitivity thresholds in dynamic signaling responses by social amoebae.

Authors:  C Joanne Wang; Adriel Bergmann; Benjamin Lin; Kyuri Kim; Andre Levchenko
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 8.192

2.  Adaptation is not required to explain the long-term response of axons to molecular gradients.

Authors:  Jun Xu; William J Rosoff; Jeffrey S Urbach; Geoffrey J Goodhill
Journal:  Development       Date:  2005-09-21       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 3.  Stochastic simulation of chemical kinetics.

Authors:  Daniel T Gillespie
Journal:  Annu Rev Phys Chem       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 12.703

4.  Stochastic signal processing and transduction in chemotactic response of eukaryotic cells.

Authors:  Masahiro Ueda; Tatsuo Shibata
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Incoherent feedforward control governs adaptation of activated ras in a eukaryotic chemotaxis pathway.

Authors:  Kosuke Takeda; Danying Shao; Micha Adler; Pascale G Charest; William F Loomis; Herbert Levine; Alex Groisman; Wouter-Jan Rappel; Richard A Firtel
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 8.192

Review 6.  IP3, a small molecule with a powerful message.

Authors:  Elke Decrock; Marijke De Bock; Nan Wang; Ashish K Gadicherla; Mélissa Bol; Tinneke Delvaeye; Peter Vandenabeele; Mathieu Vinken; Geert Bultynck; Dmitri V Krysko; Luc Leybaert
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2013-01-02

Review 7.  Pattern, growth, and control.

Authors:  Arthur D Lander
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Dictyostelium discoideum chemotaxis: threshold for directed motion.

Authors:  Loling Song; Sharvari M Nadkarni; Hendrik U Bödeker; Carsten Beta; Albert Bae; Carl Franck; Wouter-Jan Rappel; William F Loomis; Eberhard Bodenschatz
Journal:  Eur J Cell Biol       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 9.  A comparison of mathematical models for polarization of single eukaryotic cells in response to guided cues.

Authors:  Alexandra Jilkine; Leah Edelstein-Keshet
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Comparing the epidermal growth factor interaction with four different cell lines: intriguing effects imply strong dependency of cellular context.

Authors:  Hanna Björkelund; Lars Gedda; Karl Andersson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  17 in total

1.  Cell-cell communication during collective migration.

Authors:  Wouter-Jan Rappel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Dynamic Sampling and Information Encoding in Biochemical Networks.

Authors:  Garrett D Potter; Tommy A Byrd; Andrew Mugler; Bo Sun
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Minimal Network Topologies for Signal Processing during Collective Cell Chemotaxis.

Authors:  Haicen Yue; Brian A Camley; Wouter-Jan Rappel
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Collective Chemotaxis through Noisy Multicellular Gradient Sensing.

Authors:  Julien Varennes; Bumsoo Han; Andrew Mugler
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Cell-to-cell variation sets a tissue-rheology-dependent bound on collective gradient sensing.

Authors:  Brian A Camley; Wouter-Jan Rappel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  An engineering design approach to systems biology.

Authors:  Kevin A Janes; Preethi L Chandran; Roseanne M Ford; Matthew J Lazzara; Jason A Papin; Shayn M Peirce; Jeffrey J Saucerman; Douglas A Lauffenburger
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 2.192

7.  Cell-cell communication enhances the capacity of cell ensembles to sense shallow gradients during morphogenesis.

Authors:  David Ellison; Andrew Mugler; Matthew D Brennan; Sung Hoon Lee; Robert J Huebner; Eliah R Shamir; Laura A Woo; Joseph Kim; Patrick Amar; Ilya Nemenman; Andrew J Ewald; Andre Levchenko
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Collective gradient sensing and chemotaxis: modeling and recent developments.

Authors:  Brian A Camley
Journal:  J Phys Condens Matter       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 2.333

9.  Physical models of collective cell motility: from cell to tissue.

Authors:  Brian A Camley; Wouter-Jan Rappel
Journal:  J Phys D Appl Phys       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 3.207

10.  Extending the dynamic range of transcription factor action by translational regulation.

Authors:  Thomas R Sokolowski; Aleksandra M Walczak; William Bialek; Gašper Tkačik
Journal:  Phys Rev E       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 2.529

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.