Literature DB >> 16176951

Adaptation is not required to explain the long-term response of axons to molecular gradients.

Jun Xu1, William J Rosoff, Jeffrey S Urbach, Geoffrey J Goodhill.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that growth cones navigating through the developing nervous system might display adaptation, so that their response to gradient signals is conserved over wide variations in ligand concentration. Recently however, a new chemotaxis assay that allows the effect of gradient parameters on axonal trajectories to be finely varied has revealed a decline in gradient sensitivity on either side of an optimal concentration. We show that this behavior can be quantitatively reproduced with a computational model of axonal chemotaxis that does not employ explicit adaptation. Two crucial components of this model required to reproduce the observed sensitivity are spatial and temporal averaging. These can be interpreted as corresponding, respectively, to the spatial spread of signaling effects downstream from receptor binding, and to the finite time over which these signaling effects decay. For spatial averaging, the model predicts that an effective range of roughly one-third of the extent of the growth cone is optimal for detecting small gradient signals. For temporal decay, a timescale of about 3 minutes is required for the model to reproduce the experimentally observed sensitivity.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16176951     DOI: 10.1242/dev.02029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  12 in total

1.  Limits to the precision of gradient sensing with spatial communication and temporal integration.

Authors:  Andrew Mugler; Andre Levchenko; Ilya Nemenman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Bayesian model predicts the response of axons to molecular gradients.

Authors:  Duncan Mortimer; Julia Feldner; Timothy Vaughan; Irina Vetter; Zac Pujic; William J Rosoff; Kevin Burrage; Peter Dayan; Linda J Richards; Geoffrey J Goodhill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The stochastic search dynamics of interneuron migration.

Authors:  Joanne M Britto; Leigh A Johnston; Seong-Seng Tan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  Using theoretical models to analyse neural development.

Authors:  Arjen van Ooyen
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Amplification and temporal filtering during gradient sensing by nerve growth cones probed with a microfluidic assay.

Authors:  Mathieu Morel; Vasyl Shynkar; Jean-Christophe Galas; Isabelle Dupin; Cedric Bouzigues; Vincent Studer; Maxime Dahan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Multi-phasic bi-directional chemotactic responses of the growth cone.

Authors:  Honda Naoki; Makoto Nishiyama; Kazunobu Togashi; Yasunobu Igarashi; Kyonsoo Hong; Shin Ishii
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Revisiting chemoaffinity theory: Chemotactic implementation of topographic axonal projection.

Authors:  Honda Naoki
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Autocatalytic loop, amplification and diffusion: a mathematical and computational model of cell polarization in neural chemotaxis.

Authors:  Paola Causin; Giuseppe Facchetti
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Synergistic effects of 3D ECM and chemogradients on neurite outgrowth and guidance: a simple modeling and microfluidic framework.

Authors:  Parthasarathy Srinivasan; Ioannis K Zervantonakis; Chandrasekhar R Kothapalli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A mathematical model explains saturating axon guidance responses to molecular gradients.

Authors:  Huyen Nguyen; Peter Dayan; Zac Pujic; Justin Cooper-White; Geoffrey J Goodhill
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.