Literature DB >> 26787905

Ligase I and ligase III mediate the DNA double-strand break ligation in alternative end-joining.

Guangqing Lu1, Jinzhi Duan1, Sheng Shu1, Xuxiang Wang2, Linlin Gao2, Jing Guo1, Yu Zhang3.   

Abstract

In eukaryotes, DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), one of the most harmful types of DNA damage, are repaired by homologous repair (HR) and nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ). Surprisingly, in cells deficient for core classic NHEJ factors such as DNA ligase IV (Lig4), substantial end-joining activities have been observed in various situations, suggesting the existence of alternative end-joining (A-EJ) activities. Several putative A-EJ factors have been proposed, although results are mostly controversial. By using a clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) system, we generated mouse CH12F3 cell lines in which, in addition to Lig4, either Lig1 or nuclear Lig3, representing the cells containing a single DNA ligase (Lig3 or Lig1, respectively) in their nucleus, was completely ablated. Surprisingly, we found that both Lig1- and Lig3-containing complexes could efficiently catalyze A-EJ for class switching recombination (CSR) in the IgH locus and chromosomal deletions between DSBs generated by CRISPR/Cas9 in cis-chromosomes. However, only deletion of nuclear Lig3, but not Lig1, could significantly reduce the interchromosomal translocations in Lig4(-/-) cells, suggesting the unique role of Lig3 in catalyzing chromosome translocation. Additional sequence analysis of chromosome translocation junction microhomology revealed the specificity of different ligase-containing complexes. The data suggested the existence of multiple DNA ligase-containing complexes in A-EJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA ligase; alternative end-joining; chromosome translocation; class switching recombination

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26787905      PMCID: PMC4747774          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1521597113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  32 in total

1.  Impact of the KU80 pathway on NHEJ-induced genome rearrangements in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Josée Guirouilh-Barbat; Sylvie Huck; Pascale Bertrand; Livia Pirzio; Chantal Desmaze; Laure Sabatier; Bernard S Lopez
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2004-06-04       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  DNA ligase III as a candidate component of backup pathways of nonhomologous end joining.

Authors:  Huichen Wang; Bustanur Rosidi; Ronel Perrault; Minli Wang; Lihua Zhang; Frank Windhofer; George Iliakis
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-05-15       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Antibody class switching mediated by yeast endonuclease-generated DNA breaks.

Authors:  Ali A Zarrin; Catherine Del Vecchio; Eva Tseng; Megan Gleason; Payam Zarin; Ming Tian; Frederick W Alt
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Eukaryotic DNA ligases: structural and functional insights.

Authors:  Tom Ellenberger; Alan E Tomkinson
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 23.643

5.  Interplay of p53 and DNA-repair protein XRCC4 in tumorigenesis, genomic stability and development.

Authors:  Y Gao; D O Ferguson; W Xie; J P Manis; J Sekiguchi; K M Frank; J Chaudhuri; J Horner; R A DePinho; F W Alt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-04-20       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  The mechanism of double-strand DNA break repair by the nonhomologous DNA end-joining pathway.

Authors:  Michael R Lieber
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 23.643

7.  A piggyBac transposon-based genome-wide library of insertionally mutated Blm-deficient murine ES cells.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Allan Bradley; Yue Huang
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 8.  How cancer cells hijack DNA double-strand break repair pathways to gain genomic instability.

Authors:  Penny A Jeggo; Markus Löbrich
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.857

9.  DNA ligases I and III cooperate in alternative non-homologous end-joining in vertebrates.

Authors:  Katja Paul; Minli Wang; Emil Mladenov; Alena Bencsik-Theilen; Theresa Bednar; Wenqi Wu; Hiroshi Arakawa; George Iliakis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Requirement for Parp-1 and DNA ligases 1 or 3 but not of Xrcc1 in chromosomal translocation formation by backup end joining.

Authors:  Aashish Soni; Maria Siemann; Martha Grabos; Tamara Murmann; Gabriel E Pantelias; George Iliakis
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-04-19       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  35 in total

1.  Kinetic analyses of single-stranded break repair by human DNA ligase III isoforms reveal biochemical differences from DNA ligase I.

Authors:  Justin R McNally; Patrick J O'Brien
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Polymerase δ promotes chromosomal rearrangements and imprecise double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Jacob V Layer; Lydie Debaize; Alexandria Van Scoyk; Nealia C House; Alexander J Brown; Yunpeng Liu; Kristen E Stevenson; Michael Hemann; Steven A Roberts; Brendan D Price; David M Weinstock; Tovah A Day
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Interplay between DNA Polymerases and DNA Ligases: Influence on Substrate Channeling and the Fidelity of DNA Ligation.

Authors:  Melike Çağlayan
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 4.  The base excision repair process: comparison between higher and lower eukaryotes.

Authors:  Nagham Nafiz Hindi; Noha Elsakrmy; Dindial Ramotar
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 5.  Precision gene editing technology and applications in nephrology.

Authors:  Zachary WareJoncas; Jarryd M Campbell; Gabriel Martínez-Gálvez; William A C Gendron; Michael A Barry; Peter C Harris; Caroline R Sussman; Stephen C Ekker
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 28.314

6.  Double-stranded DNA break polarity skews repair pathway choice during intrachromosomal and interchromosomal recombination.

Authors:  Alexanda K Ling; Clare C So; Michael X Le; Audrey Y Chen; Lisa Hung; Alberto Martin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Imprecision and DNA Break Repair Biased towards Incompatible End Joining in Leukemia.

Authors:  Franz Josef Gassner; Maria Schubert; Stefan Rebhandl; Karina Spandl; Nadja Zaborsky; Kemal Catakovic; Stephanie Blaimer; Daniel Hebenstreit; Richard Greil; Roland Geisberger
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 5.852

8.  LIG1 syndrome mutations remodel a cooperative network of ligand binding interactions to compromise ligation efficiency.

Authors:  Thomas J Jurkiw; Percy P Tumbale; Matthew J Schellenberg; Charlotte Cunningham-Rundles; R Scott Williams; Patrick J O'Brien
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 9.  Exploiting DNA Endonucleases to Advance Mechanisms of DNA Repair.

Authors:  Marlo K Thompson; Robert W Sobol; Aishwarya Prakash
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-14

10.  Biallelic mutations in DNA ligase 1 underlie a spectrum of immune deficiencies.

Authors:  Patrick Maffucci; Jose Chavez; Thomas J Jurkiw; Patrick J O'Brien; Jordan K Abbott; Paul R Reynolds; Austen Worth; Luigi D Notarangelo; Kerstin Felgentreff; Patricia Cortes; Bertrand Boisson; Lin Radigan; Aurélie Cobat; Chitra Dinakar; Mohammad Ehlayel; Tawfeg Ben-Omran; Erwin W Gelfand; Jean-Laurent Casanova; Charlotte Cunningham-Rundles
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 14.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.