Literature DB >> 26392571

How cancer cells hijack DNA double-strand break repair pathways to gain genomic instability.

Penny A Jeggo1, Markus Löbrich2.   

Abstract

DNA DSBs (double-strand breaks) are a significant threat to the viability of a normal cell, since they can result in loss of genetic material if mitosis or replication is attempted in their presence. Consequently, evolutionary pressure has resulted in multiple pathways and responses to enable DSBs to be repaired efficiently and faithfully. Cancer cells, which are under pressure to gain genomic instability, have a striking ability to avoid the elegant mechanisms by which normal cells maintain genomic stability. Current models suggest that, in normal cells, DSB repair occurs in a hierarchical manner that promotes rapid and efficient rejoining first, with the utilization of additional steps or pathways of diminished accuracy if rejoining is unsuccessful or delayed. In the present review, we evaluate the fidelity of DSB repair pathways and discuss how cancer cells promote the utilization of less accurate processes. Homologous recombination serves to promote accuracy and stability during replication, providing a battlefield for cancer to gain instability. Non-homologous end-joining, a major DSB repair pathway in mammalian cells, usually operates with high fidelity and only switches to less faithful modes if timely repair fails. The transition step is finely tuned and provides another point of attack during tumour progression. In addition to DSB repair, a DSB signalling response activates processes such as cell cycle checkpoint arrest, which enhance the possibility of accurate DSB repair. We consider the ways by which cancers modify and hijack these processes to gain genomic instability.
© 2015 Authors; published by Portland Press Limited.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alternative NHEJ; cancer cells; double-strand break repair; genomic stability; homologous recombination; non-homologous end-joining

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26392571     DOI: 10.1042/BJ20150582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem J        ISSN: 0264-6021            Impact factor:   3.857


  41 in total

Review 1.  The DNA damage-induced cell death response: a roadmap to kill cancer cells.

Authors:  Sonja Matt; Thomas G Hofmann
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 2.  Pharmacogenomics of platinum-based chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: focusing on DNA repair systems.

Authors:  Yi Xiong; Bi-Yun Huang; Ji-Ye Yin
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-02-18       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 3.  Targeting DNA Repair in Cancer: Beyond PARP Inhibitors.

Authors:  Jessica S Brown; Brent O'Carrigan; Stephen P Jackson; Timothy A Yap
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 39.397

4.  Downregulation of eukaryotic initiation factor 4A1 improves radiosensitivity by delaying DNA double strand break repair in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Shanhui Liang; Xingzhu Ju; Yuqi Zhou; Yiran Chen; Guihao Ke; Hao Wen; Xiaohua Wu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Biochemistry: Complex assistance for DNA invasion.

Authors:  Petr Cejka
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Ligase I and ligase III mediate the DNA double-strand break ligation in alternative end-joining.

Authors:  Guangqing Lu; Jinzhi Duan; Sheng Shu; Xuxiang Wang; Linlin Gao; Jing Guo; Yu Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Small-Molecule Inhibitors Targeting DNA Repair and DNA Repair Deficiency in Research and Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Sarah R Hengel; M Ashley Spies; Maria Spies
Journal:  Cell Chem Biol       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 8.116

8.  Monitoring Replication Protein A (RPA) dynamics in homologous recombination through site-specific incorporation of non-canonical amino acids.

Authors:  Nilisha Pokhrel; Sofia Origanti; Eric Parker Davenport; Disha Gandhi; Kyle Kaniecki; Ryan A Mehl; Eric C Greene; Chris Dockendorff; Edwin Antony
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 9.  DNA damage and tissue repair: What we can learn from planaria.

Authors:  Paul G Barghouth; Manish Thiruvalluvan; Melanie LeGro; Néstor J Oviedo
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 7.727

10.  Nek1 Regulates Rad54 to Orchestrate Homologous Recombination and Replication Fork Stability.

Authors:  Julian Spies; Anja Waizenegger; Olivia Barton; Michael Sürder; William D Wright; Wolf-Dietrich Heyer; Markus Löbrich
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 17.970

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.