Literature DB >> 28751376

Kinetic analyses of single-stranded break repair by human DNA ligase III isoforms reveal biochemical differences from DNA ligase I.

Justin R McNally1, Patrick J O'Brien2.   

Abstract

Humans have three genes encoding DNA ligases with conserved structural features and activities, but they also have notable differences. The LIG3 gene encodes a ubiquitous isoform in all tissues (LIG3α) and a germ line-specific splicing isoform (LIG3β) that differs in the C-terminal domain. Both isoforms are found in the nucleus and the mitochondria. Here, we determined the kinetics and thermodynamics of single-stranded break ligation by LIG3α and LIG3β and compared this framework to that of LIG1, the nuclear replicative ligase. The kinetic parameters of the LIG3 isoforms are nearly identical under all tested conditions, indicating that the BRCA1 C terminal (BRCT) domain specific to LIG3α does not alter ligation kinetics. Although LIG3 is only 22% identical to LIG1 across their conserved domains, the two enzymes had very similar maximal ligation rates. Comparison of the rate and equilibrium constants for LIG3 and LIG1 nevertheless revealed important differences. The LIG3 isoforms were seven times more efficient than LIG1 at ligating nicked DNA under optimal conditions, mainly because of their lower Km value for the DNA substrate. This could explain why LIG3 is less prone to abortive ligation than LIG1. Surprisingly, the affinity of LIG3 for Mg2+ was ten times weaker than that of LIG1, suggesting that Mg2+ availability regulates DNA ligation in vivo, because Mg2+ levels are higher in the mitochondria than in the nucleus. The biochemical differences between the LIG3 isoforms and LIG1 identified here will guide the understanding of both unique and overlapping biological roles of these critical enzymes.
© 2017 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA ligase; DNA repair; DNA replication; abortive ligation; enzyme catalysis; magnesium; pre-steady-state kinetics; steady-state; steady-state kinetics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28751376      PMCID: PMC5612117          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M117.804625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  47 in total

1.  Targeting abnormal DNA double-strand break repair in tyrosine kinase inhibitor-resistant chronic myeloid leukemias.

Authors:  L A Tobin; C Robert; A P Rapoport; I Gojo; M R Baer; A E Tomkinson; F V Rassool
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 9.867

2.  Role of the DNA ligase III zinc finger in polynucleotide binding and ligation.

Authors:  R M Taylor; J Whitehouse; E Cappelli; G Frosina; K W Caldecott
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1998-11-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 3.  Cellular magnesium homeostasis.

Authors:  Andrea M P Romani
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 4.013

4.  The DNA ligase III zinc finger stimulates binding to DNA secondary structure and promotes end joining.

Authors:  R M Taylor; C J Whitehouse; K W Caldecott
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  DNA ligase III is recruited to DNA strand breaks by a zinc finger motif homologous to that of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Identification of two functionally distinct DNA binding regions within DNA ligase III.

Authors:  Z B Mackey; C Niedergang; J M Murcia; J Leppard; K Au; J Chen; G de Murcia; A E Tomkinson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1999-07-30       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  An alternative splicing event which occurs in mouse pachytene spermatocytes generates a form of DNA ligase III with distinct biochemical properties that may function in meiotic recombination.

Authors:  Z B Mackey; W Ramos; D S Levin; C A Walter; J R McCarrey; A E Tomkinson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  An interaction between the mammalian DNA repair protein XRCC1 and DNA ligase III.

Authors:  K W Caldecott; C K McKeown; J D Tucker; S Ljungquist; L H Thompson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  DNA ligases as therapeutic targets.

Authors:  Alan E Tomkinson; Timothy R L Howes; Nathaniel E Wiest
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.241

9.  DNA ligase I null mouse cells show normal DNA repair activity but altered DNA replication and reduced genome stability.

Authors:  Darren J Bentley; Caroline Harrison; Ann-Marie Ketchen; Nicola J Redhead; Kay Samuel; Martin Waterfall; John D Ansell; David W Melton
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 5.285

10.  Escape from telomere-driven crisis is DNA ligase III dependent.

Authors:  Rhiannon E Jones; Sehyun Oh; Julia W Grimstead; Jacob Zimbric; Laureline Roger; Nicole H Heppel; Kevin E Ashelford; Kate Liddiard; Eric A Hendrickson; Duncan M Baird
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 9.423

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Interplay between DNA Polymerases and DNA Ligases: Influence on Substrate Channeling and the Fidelity of DNA Ligation.

Authors:  Melike Çağlayan
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Dynamic Processing of a Common Oxidative DNA Lesion by the First Two Enzymes of the Base Excision Repair Pathway.

Authors:  Austin T Raper; Brian A Maxwell; Zucai Suo
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 3.  Oxidative Damage in Sporadic Colorectal Cancer: Molecular Mapping of Base Excision Repair Glycosylases in Colorectal Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Pavel Vodicka; Marketa Urbanova; Pavol Makovicky; Kristyna Tomasova; Michal Kroupa; Rudolf Stetina; Alena Opattova; Klara Kostovcikova; Anna Siskova; Michaela Schneiderova; Veronika Vymetalkova; Ludmila Vodickova
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  In vitro reconstitution reveals a key role of human mitochondrial EXOG in RNA primer processing.

Authors:  Anna Karlowicz; Andrzej B Dubiel; Jolanta Czerwinska; Adela Bledea; Piotr Purzycki; Marta Grzelewska; Ryan J McAuley; Roman J Szczesny; Gabriela Brzuska; Ewelina Krol; Bartosz Szczesny; Michal R Szymanski
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 19.160

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.