Literature DB >> 26785164

Differential bitterness in capsaicin, piperine, and ethanol associates with polymorphisms in multiple bitter taste receptor genes.

Alissa A Nolden1, John E McGeary2, John E Hayes3.   

Abstract

To date, the majority of research exploring associations with genetic variability in bitter taste receptors has understandably focused on compounds and foods that are predominantly or solely perceived as bitter. However, other chemosensory stimuli are also known to elicit bitterness as a secondary sensation. Here we investigated whether TAS2R variation explains individual differences in bitterness elicited by chemesthetic stimuli, including capsaicin, piperine and ethanol. We confirmed that capsaicin, piperine and ethanol elicit bitterness in addition to burning/stinging sensations. Variability in perceived bitterness of capsaicin and ethanol were significantly associated with TAS2R38 and TAS2R3/4/5 diplotypes. For TAS2R38, PAV homozygotes perceived greater bitterness from capsaicin and ethanol presented on circumvallate papillae, compared to heterozygotes and AVI homozygotes. For TAS2R3/4/5, CCCAGT homozygotes rated the greatest bitterness, compared to heterozygotes and TTGGAG homozygotes, for both ethanol and capsaicin when presented on circumvallate papillae. Additional work is needed to determine how these and other chemesthetic stimuli differ in bitterness perception across concentrations and presentation methods. Furthermore, it would be beneficial to determine which TAS2R receptors are activated in vitro by chemesthetic compounds.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alcohol; Chemosensory; Genetics; Preference; Taste phenotype

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26785164      PMCID: PMC4898060          DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.01.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  55 in total

1.  Individual differences in perception of bitterness from capsaicin, piperine and zingerone.

Authors:  Barry G Green; John E Hayes
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Signatures of natural selection in a primate bitter taste receptor.

Authors:  Stephen Wooding
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Allelic variation in TAS2R bitter receptor genes associates with variation in sensations from and ingestive behaviors toward common bitter beverages in adults.

Authors:  John E Hayes; Margaret R Wallace; Valerie S Knopik; Deborah M Herbstman; Linda M Bartoshuk; Valerie B Duffy
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Contrasting modes of evolution between vertebrate sweet/umami receptor genes and bitter receptor genes.

Authors:  Peng Shi; Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Polymorphisms in TAS2R38 and the taste bud trophic factor, gustin gene co-operate in modulating PROP taste phenotype.

Authors:  Carla Calò; Alessandra Padiglia; Andrea Zonza; Laura Corrias; Paolo Contu; Beverly J Tepper; Iole Tomassini Barbarossa
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-06-25

6.  Rapid recovery from capsaicin desensitization during recurrent stimulation.

Authors:  B G Green
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  T2Rs function as bitter taste receptors.

Authors:  J Chandrashekar; K L Mueller; M A Hoon; E Adler; L Feng; W Guo; C S Zuker; N J Ryba
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-03-17       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  The receptors and coding logic for bitter taste.

Authors:  Ken L Mueller; Mark A Hoon; Isolde Erlenbach; Jayaram Chandrashekar; Charles S Zuker; Nicholas J P Ryba
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-03-10       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Bitterness of the non-nutritive sweetener acesulfame potassium varies with polymorphisms in TAS2R9 and TAS2R31.

Authors:  Alissa L Allen; John E McGeary; Valerie S Knopik; John E Hayes
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 3.160

10.  Specific alleles of bitter receptor genes influence human sensitivity to the bitterness of aloin and saccharin.

Authors:  Alexey N Pronin; Hong Xu; Huixian Tang; Lan Zhang; Qing Li; Xiaodong Li
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of Sweetener Synergy in Humans by Isobole Analyses.

Authors:  M Michelle Reyes; Stephen A Gravina; John E Hayes
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Fetal alcohol exposure reduces responsiveness of taste nerves and trigeminal chemosensory neurons to ethanol and its flavor components.

Authors:  John I Glendinning; Joyce Tang; Ana Paula Morales Allende; Bruce P Bryant; Lisa Youngentob; Steven L Youngentob
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Use of Adult Sensory Panel to Study Individual Differences in the Palatability of a Pediatric HIV Treatment Drug.

Authors:  Julie A Mennella; Phoebe S Mathew; Elizabeth D Lowenthal
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 3.393

4.  Predominant Qualities Evoked by Quinine, Sucrose, and Capsaicin Associate With PROP Bitterness, but not TAS2R38 Genotype.

Authors:  Alissa A Nolden; John E McGeary; John E Hayes
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 5.  Taste buds: cells, signals and synapses.

Authors:  Stephen D Roper; Nirupa Chaudhari
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  Perceptual and Affective Responses to Sampled Capsaicin Differ by Reported Intake.

Authors:  Alissa A Nolden; John E Hayes
Journal:  Food Qual Prefer       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 5.565

7.  Brief Exposures to the Taste of Ethanol (EtOH) and Quinine Promote Subsequent Acceptance of EtOH in a Paradigm that Minimizes Postingestive Consequences.

Authors:  Gregory C Loney; Paul J Meyer
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 3.455

8.  Characterizing Dynamic Sensory Properties of Nutritive and Nonnutritive Sweeteners with Temporal Check-All-That-Apply.

Authors:  M Michelle Reyes; John C Castura; John E Hayes
Journal:  J Sens Stud       Date:  2017-05-20       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  Influence of biological, experiential and psychological factors in wine preference segmentation.

Authors:  Gary J Pickering; John E Hayes
Journal:  Aust J Grape Wine Res       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 2.688

10.  Postnatal Exposure to Ethanol Increases Its Oral Acceptability to Adolescent Rats.

Authors:  Joyce Tang; Steven L Youngentob; John I Glendinning
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2018-09-22       Impact factor: 3.160

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.