Literature DB >> 16207936

Contrasting modes of evolution between vertebrate sweet/umami receptor genes and bitter receptor genes.

Peng Shi1, Jianzhi Zhang.   

Abstract

Taste reception is fundamental to diet selection in many animals. The genetic basis underlying the evolution and diversity of taste reception, however, is not well understood. Recent discoveries of T1R sweet/umami receptor genes and T2R bitter receptor genes in humans and mice provided an opportunity to address this question. Here, we report the identification of 20 putatively functional T1R genes and 167 T2R genes from the genome sequences of nine vertebrates, including three fishes, one amphibian, one bird, and four mammals. Our comparative genomic analysis shows that orthologous T1R sequences are relatively conserved in evolution and that the T1R gene repertoire remains virtually constant in size across most vertebrates, except for the loss of the T1R2 sweet receptor gene in the sweet-insensitive chicken and the absence of all T1R genes in the tongueless western clawed frog. In contrast, orthologous T2R sequences are more variable, and the T2R repertoire diverges tremendously among species, from only three functional genes in the chicken to 49 in the frog. These evolutionary patterns suggest the relative constancy in the number and type of sweet and umami tastants encountered by various vertebrates or low binding specificities of T1Rs but a large variation in the number and type of bitter compounds detected by different species. Although the rate of gene duplication is much lower in T1Rs than in T2Rs, signals of positive selection are detected during the functional divergences of paralogous T1Rs, as was previously found among paralogous T2Rs. Thus, functional divergence and specialization of taste receptors generally occurred via adaptive evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16207936     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msj028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  88 in total

1.  Signatures of natural selection in a primate bitter taste receptor.

Authors:  Stephen Wooding
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Major taste loss in carnivorous mammals.

Authors:  Peihua Jiang; Jesusa Josue; Xia Li; Dieter Glaser; Weihua Li; Joseph G Brand; Robert F Margolskee; Danielle R Reed; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Transcriptional profiling of hypothalamus during development of adiposity in genetically selected fat and lean chickens.

Authors:  Mardi S Byerly; Jean Simon; Larry A Cogburn; Elisabeth Le Bihan-Duval; Michel J Duclos; Samuel E Aggrey; Tom E Porter
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.107

4.  Pseudogenization of the umami taste receptor gene Tas1r1 in the giant panda coincided with its dietary switch to bamboo.

Authors:  Huabin Zhao; Jian-Rong Yang; Huailiang Xu; Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 5.  Genetics of taste and smell: poisons and pleasures.

Authors:  Danielle Renee Reed; Antti Knaapila
Journal:  Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.622

Review 6.  Use it or lose it: molecular evolution of sensory signaling in primates.

Authors:  Emily R Liman
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 3.657

7.  Comparative genomic analysis identifies an evolutionary shift of vomeronasal receptor gene repertoires in the vertebrate transition from water to land.

Authors:  Peng Shi; Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-01-08       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  The new mutation theory of phenotypic evolution.

Authors:  Masatoshi Nei
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Molecular mechanisms of taste transduction in vertebrates.

Authors:  Yoshiro Ishimaru
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 2.634

Review 10.  Genetics of taste receptors.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Natalia P Bosak; Cailu Lin; Ichiro Matsumoto; Makoto Ohmoto; Danielle R Reed; Theodore M Nelson
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.116

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.