Literature DB >> 29104366

Characterizing Dynamic Sensory Properties of Nutritive and Nonnutritive Sweeteners with Temporal Check-All-That-Apply.

M Michelle Reyes1,2, John C Castura3, John E Hayes1,2.   

Abstract

Temporal Check-All-That-Apply (TCATA) is a rapid method where attributes are actively checked and unchecked to track sensations over time, so that the checked words fully describe the sample in any given moment. Here, we characterize the temporal profiles of sweeteners using TCATA. In two experiments, sweeteners were tested in water at concentrations known to elicit weak to moderate sweetness. Before evaluating the sweeteners, participants (n= ~125 per experiment) were familiarized with the TCATA method with a guided example using imaginary samples of Kool-Aid. Participants then received 10 ml of each sweetener solution and were instructed to click "start" after he or she finished swallowing the sample. Incidence of 6 attributes obtained from prior literature - sweet, bitter, metallic, licorice, cooling, and drying - was obtained for 60s. We observed similarities across temporal profiles of various sweeteners: sweet and bitter occurred first (~10s), then metallic and cooling (~10-25s), followed by drying much later (30-50s depending on the stimulus). The presence of side tastes influenced how often 'sweet' was endorsed: stimuli with fewer endorsements of side tastes showed more prominent sweetness. Finally, unfamiliar side tastes may lead to a smearing bias where participants check every attribute in an attempt to characterize those unfamiliar sensations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fructose; neohesperidin dihydrochalcone; rebaudioside; sucralose; thaumatin

Year:  2017        PMID: 29104366      PMCID: PMC5665403          DOI: 10.1111/joss.12270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sens Stud        ISSN: 0887-8250            Impact factor:   2.991


  11 in total

1.  Temporal perception of sweetness by adults and children using computerized time-intensity measures.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Temple; David G Laing; Ian Hutchinson; Anthony L Jinks
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Individual differences in perception of bitterness from capsaicin, piperine and zingerone.

Authors:  Barry G Green; John E Hayes
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 3.  Non-caloric sweeteners, sweetness modulators, and sweetener enhancers.

Authors:  Grant E DuBois; Indra Prakash
Journal:  Annu Rev Food Sci Technol       Date:  2012-01-03

4.  Differences in the chemesthetic subqualities of capsaicin, ibuprofen, and olive oil.

Authors:  Samantha M Bennett; John E Hayes
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 3.160

5.  Bitter taste of saccharin and acesulfame-K.

Authors:  John Horne; Harry T Lawless; Ward Speirs; Domenic Sposato
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Single sweetness signal.

Authors:  P A Breslin; S Kemp; G K Beauchamp
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Differential bitterness in capsaicin, piperine, and ethanol associates with polymorphisms in multiple bitter taste receptor genes.

Authors:  Alissa A Nolden; John E McGeary; John E Hayes
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-01-16

8.  Sugar reduction in probiotic chocolate-flavored milk: Impact on dynamic sensory profile and liking.

Authors:  Denize Oliveira; Lucía Antúnez; Ana Giménez; John C Castura; Rosires Deliza; Gastón Ares
Journal:  Food Res Int       Date:  2015-05-31       Impact factor: 6.475

9.  Bitterness of the non-nutritive sweetener acesulfame potassium varies with polymorphisms in TAS2R9 and TAS2R31.

Authors:  Alissa L Allen; John E McGeary; Valerie S Knopik; John E Hayes
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 10.  Nonnutritive sweeteners are not supernormal stimuli.

Authors:  R G Antenucci; J E Hayes
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 5.095

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of Sweetener Synergy in Humans by Isobole Analyses.

Authors:  M Michelle Reyes; Stephen A Gravina; John E Hayes
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Discrimination of Isointense Bitter Stimuli in a Beer Model System.

Authors:  Molly J Higgins; John E Hayes
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 5.717

3.  A Comparison of Psychophysical Dose-Response Behaviour across 16 Sweeteners.

Authors:  May Wee; Vicki Tan; Ciarán Forde
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 5.717

4.  Changes in temporal sensory profile, liking, satiety, and postconsumption attributes of yogurt with natural sweeteners.

Authors:  Diksha Chadha; Nazimah Hamid; Kevin Kantono; Manon Marsan
Journal:  J Food Sci       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.693

5.  Descriptive Sensory Profile and Consumer Study Impact of Different Nutritive and Non-Nutritive Sweeteners on the Descriptive, Temporal Profile, and Consumer Acceptance in a Peach Juice Matrix.

Authors:  Alessandra Medeiros; Elson Tavares; Helena Maria Andre Bolini
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-01-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.